10 x $25,000 Stellar Challenge GIVEAWAY
To Win ⤵️
▫️Follow - @PsychedeliaAcad & @Techriztm
▫️Also follow - @FundedNext & @TraderHadesh
▫️Like & Repost this GIVEAWAY
▫️Post proof of following the above 4 handles & comment done
That’s all💯
Winners after 48hrs
Let’s go📈
Make sure you’re signed up to Fundednext to ensure you win > 🔗 https://t.co/NeoLUezqHu
I have something to share this morning. The Lord gave me some wisdom around midnight while I prayed today.
I believe this will help someone, as the Lord moved me to share it.
So, I started praying around 12:19 a.m. Less than five minutes in, the Lord said in my spirit:
"I deserve more, you know. More of your time, energy, and strength."
This statement would set the thesis of the entire prayer and all He would tell me subsequently.
Around twenty-nine minutes in, He started talking about sacrifices.
Right now, one of the costliest sacrifices anyone can offer the Lord is time.
There is almost nothing more valuable today than time—nothing people cherish more.
In this current world, everything calls for our time, from social media to entertainment.
We give our time to many things and many people, except God.
So, He said that those who would grow in rank in Him would be those who can and will give Him their time.
As I continued praying, more insights came to my spirit.
I realized that rank in God is not determined by age but by sacrifice.
Those who are favored in the sight of God are those who will leave all for Him.
No wonder God commended Abraham after he willingly offered up his only son.
So, I came to some conclusions in that prayer yesterday.
I decided to increase the number of chapters I read each day.
I have added more time to my prayer life. I also made more commitments to God that I won't share here.
But I want you to invest your time in God.
Give Him the next twenty years of your life. It doesn't matter your age.
Please, do.
Prioritize God above everything else through your time.
This is my message to you.
Also, don't make it transactional. Don't expect anything material in return.
Do it simply for the reward of knowing the Lord more.
I wish to see you in twenty years, saying that this tweet changed your walk with God.
God bless you. Amen.
PS: If you are seeking to know God more, I will be holding a meeting titled Power for Holiness this month.
Saturday, July 25
LAMP Studio, Commercial Road, UNILAG
12:00 noon
The power to stay with God in holiness will be present.
You can register below this tweet if you would love to come.
Amen.
Happy wedding anniversary to our father, Apostle Gideon Odoma @gideonodoma and Rev'd Hassana Odoma.
18 years of modelling the sacred union of Christ and the church is a blessedness.
May the Lord bless your home continuosly, sir and ma'am. Amen.
@Preacherrapper This just proves me right, I am certain he probably prepared that message using the same AI, no wonder its always vocabularies without any substance...
AI apostle una...
IS Grok REALLY, REALLY an AI chatbot?
Stuck in traffic this morning and trying to distract myself from the prospect of missing my flight, I decided to grok a bit, just to confirm if I am the only mad one or if Grok shares in some of my alleged insanity.
"This guy you want to marry, is he really, really born again?" Whenever I reference such popular statements in my teaching, it is usually to say how theologically inaccurate it is, even though the intent may be noble. I would then say that the born again experience itself cannot be improved, therefore there are no degrees of born-againness, meaning that you are either born again or not born again. I would then clarify that what such statements actually intend to query is transformation and not regeneration. Anyone who has not heard me teach this hasn't heard me teach on holiness or transformation, at all.
So, seeing that there has lately been some noise about a clip of me saying there is a gradient in holiness or something of that hue (truth is, I haven't watched that clip, but I know what I have said – here & there – in that regard), I decided to disturb Grok this morning.
First I asked Grok to theologically differentiate between Righteousness & Holiness. It came back with the typical, orthodox response associating Righteousness with Justification (imputed & positional) and linking holiness with Sanctification (practical & progressive).
I followed up with the question in the screenshot. I asked:
"Theologically therefore, can a Christian be more holy than another, even though they are both equally righteous?"
First line of Grok's response, was:
"Yes, theologically, one Christian can be more (progressively) holy than another, even while both are equally righteous in the sight of God."
The last paragraph of Grok's response went:
"In short: Equal in Christ’s righteousness and positional holiness—yet capable of real differences in progressive holiness here and now. This is the consistent biblical and theological framework across historic Protestant, Reformed, and evangelical teaching."
I chucked to see Grok appealling to "historic Protestant, Reformed, and evangelical teaching." As if to say, "if you think I am insane in saying theologically, a Christian can be said to be more holy (progressively) than another, I got my view from historic Protestant, Reformed, and evangelical teaching."
WHERE THE CRITICS ARE RIGHT, but...
Granted, a theological case can be made for the view that in a sense a believer can be more holy than another, yet, it is another matter how believers express it.
Some believers pray in tongues more than others, yet, it isn't Christlike to boast to a whole church: "I thank my God that I pray in tongues MORE THAN you ALL..." Therefore, if you wake-up and begin to flaunt your supposed superior holiness in the faces of believers, it may actually be the evidence that you are not so holy after all, because flaunting in this case is synonym for boasting. Boasting, in context is not one of the evidences of holiness. Here then, the critics would be right, if there was no context to the clip other than just an attempt to say I am more holy than some believers (real or imagined).
But there is a context. It is that everytime some believer comes up to charge the church to holy living, some other believers (trying to discredit or discourage the preacher), would say things like: "see how he is talking as if he is more holy." It is against the backdrop of this blackmail strategy that I usually respond with, "So what? I may actually be holier than you, and you may truly be holier than me, because we are not all holy to the same degree." I say it in more or less a polemical context, to bite the bullet and return to the main issue of advocating for purity.
If context is missing in clip, I'd still expect critics to at least say, "I can grant the theology, but I don't see the piety – without context."
But Gotcha!
NB:
I just asked Gemini too
https://t.co/VjIBwRXvMp
“If women were taught about submission, we wouldn’t need to shout, ‘Husbands, love your wives,’ at men everyday.”
You see how illogical and biased that sounds?
Having taught at Bible college for 7 years after graduating, I’ve always carried the weight of trying to balance biblical teaching.
For example:
1. Don’t teach children to obey their parents and respect their elders without also teaching parents not to provoke their children.
2. Don’t preach about hell with such intensity that people only leave terrified, without proclaiming with even more conviction the hope of heaven; the city whose streets are of gold, where there is no night, no need for the sun, because the Lamb Himself is its light.
3. Don’t magnify the devil in such a way that people fear him more than they trust God; for the love and power of God will always be greater than any fear of the enemy.
The same principle applies to marriage.
A preacher should not repeatedly teach women about submission without giving equal emphasis to the command that husbands are to love their wives as Christ loves His Church.
A woman should not marry a man she knows she cannot submit to.
A man should not marry a woman he knows he cannot love as Christ loves His church.
It is unfair to always blame a husband every time a wife chooses to act contrary to Scripture.
Consider the first marriage in Scripture:
Adam received God’s command concerning the tree before Eve was created. Yet by Genesis 3, Eve already knew God’s instruction, meaning Adam had faithfully communicated it to her. Yet, she was deceived and ate of the fruit. Adam, however, sinned knowingly.
Both were held accountable by God. Deception did not remove Eve’s responsibility, and Adam’s leadership did not excuse his disobedience. Each answered for their own actions.
The same remains true today.
If a virtuous woman refuses to submit to her own husband, Scripture places responsibility on her for that choice. Likewise, if a faithful husband refuses to love his wife sacrificially, he is accountable before God.
We cannot continually excuse one person’s disobedience by placing all the blame on the other.
So, Deborah, if a woman truly desires to obey the Lord, she will submit to her husband as unto Christ. If a man truly desires to obey the Lord, he will love his wife as Christ loves His Church: and both will continually submit to one another out of reverence for Christ.
As believers, we cannot keep weaponizing Scripture against one another. The Word of God is likened to a mirror; before it confronts someone else, it confronts us.
James 1:22-25
“Anyone who listens to the word but does not do what it says is like someone who looks at his face in a mirror and, after looking at himself, goes away and immediately forgets what he looks like… But whoever looks intently into the perfect law that gives freedom, and continues in it… will be blessed in what they do.”
Scripture cannot be broken.
Yesterday I posted my BTC and ETH losses.
What I didn’t mention was the 20k+ I made on AUDCHF earlier in the week.
Net result? Break-even. And that’s risk management working exactly as it should.
3 trades. Same risk on each. One winner covered two losers and still came out ahead. No blown account, no revenge trading. Just a system doing its job.
This is why I’ll never stop talking about managing your risk.
Because nobody knows what the market is going to do.
We’re all trading probability and the only edge you truly own is how you manage your downside.
Execute your edge. Protect your capital. Let the math work in your favour🧑🍳
@d_ocheido Deborah,
Scripture commands the Wife’s to submit to their husbands, whether her husband is a good leader or not.
The concern of being a good leader or not should have been put into proper consideration before marriage.
But after marriage it is ‘submit’ as scripture says