@ImNotOwned I mean, yeah, if 50%+ of the country really wants those policies it's time to just pass them and let the independence movement happen for the great new coastal nation of California-Washington-Oregon.
@ben_golub@RPShah_econ@Tyler_Menzer@RefineDotInk not that anybody asked my opinion but I'd be curious about a cheap test. for each entrant/state evaluate whether an updated net-value objective is still increasing at the cash ceiling and whether net entry surplus remains positive. If both hold almost everywhere, salvageable!
@AlanMCole@RichardHanania Eh. It's a multiple choice test though. I understand a casual slip-up of x>2, but the answer choices includes "x<-2 or x>2." A competent Berkely freshman should see that option and instantly know that's the right one.
@fluxtheorist The whole thing actually isn't about scalars at all. It's just a technical historical dispute about what axioms you want for QM that should've died in the 70s
@fluxtheorist This paper is mostly about the equivalence relation, not R v C. C structure must in QM. Renou (2021) made a falsifiable version of RQM. This paper constructs one isomorphic to CQM with an axiom ppl may or may not like. Naturally, like all RQM, it will costs you local tomography.
@fizziksBoris@bcubeddd@APSphysics Just a dead historical dispute about real QM from the 60s that Renou (2021) pointlessly ginned up. You can't eliminate C structure in QM. The whole "research" line is either pedantry about scalars, or if you care a lot about if local tomography is mandatory (which picks out C).
@Samuel_Gregson It just seems very natural for hep phenomenology to chase models that produce near-term observables? Maybe it was oversold how plausible these observations where at LHC, but it obviously doesn't kill the ST program.
@Samuel_Gregson For obvious reason the ST & phenomenology most discussed - if not necessarily most believed - were ones with sub-TeV observations. Of course, you'd expend efforts into models that were within reach! It's strange to me now that ppl who should know better consider this failure.
@styrofoamcrispy USFS really thought Zhou had some bullshit sneaky Oly bronze in him. If you give Vincent real PCS in the short (48 even at nationals is stupid) - the podium is Nathan, Ilia, Jason and you just take it. Gold metal contender+future development+fan fav. It was right there!
@shaneholIanders I've never watched the show but my for you tab is flooded with whatever this is for some reason and to a complete outsider, I just find it unlikely the Asian guy is a white supremacist who was welcomed into a friend group of white supremacists lol
@spiralrevival This can lead to especially dramatic falls bc the limbs are long, the rotational momentum is high, and once the landing blade catches wrong, the body has a lot of leverage to whip around - hence the Jun splat.
@spiralrevival love Jun but his take-off position is often “A-shape" - ankles wide, knees pinched, hips low. His COM is rarely cleanly stacked over the takeoff blade. Instead of pushing up cleanly through the center, the force comes at an angle. So his axis is strange throughout the jump.
@souljagoyteller GDP/capita has grown ~2.0% annually in the US since 1870 pretty much no matter what happens. The safest bet is just to assume that will continue - not a hard prediction by Krugs actually!
@AliceFromQueens@hecubian_devil It obviously should not be this way but if a police force wants to fuck over your mayorship they absolutely can and will
@RobertSecundus Movie’s cute enough but it’s the kind of movie they released every November in the early/mid 2000s that have now been completely forgotten for the reason that they were only “cute enough”
@cszabla A failed physicist, turned failed economist, turned blogger who never published anything as an academic has thoughts on the research community!