@Natalie_Furn I would say only do it if you're really passionate about the topic. It won't help you earn more and there's opportunity cost for sure. Happy to talk if you want more depth on this.
Want a product job where you talk to and think about users every day? Where amazing user experience is your top concern?
If so, DM me. We're hiring :)
JD: https://t.co/qyGzjMusFD
In your product resume, don't forget to mention what your products do.
You built a product strategy at Company X? Great! What the heck does that company do?
I'm noticing that at least half the resumes coming though miss this key info.
As my time at @Eigen_Tech officially comes to a close, I am so grateful to my amazing team. Not only are they consumate professionals who do their work with incredible care, they also planned such a touching send-off - including a poem! I will miss you allโค๏ธ
5/ AI products often entail simultaneously addressing technical feasibility and market fit. This is hard. Make sure you have a bread-and-butter problem that drives revenue with well-understood tech so that you can make these investments. Otherwise be prepared for pain.
One more ML Q&A before the holidays:
How does prod mgt differ between traditional SaaS and ML/AI products?
1. Platform + portfolio, rather than product
2. Services and margins
3. Non-determinism and testing
4. The R&D process
5. Technical + market feasibility in parallel
4/ Ongoing R&D is critical for ML products - people expect them to get better over time. Build flexibly from day one so that new science can be easily tested in the product. Also hire a science PM to facilitate the R&D into production process.
Enterprise Product Q&A:
What does "good" look like for a machine learning model?
Thinking about this question often brings me back to natural language user research I was involved in at Microsoft....
Of course, "good" depends a lot on the problem and the business need. But watching people get frustrated with systems at the 75% accuracy mark gave me a visceral reminder of what ML accuracy means to product quality. 3/3
We did several small studies to figure out how people engage with voice systems.
When accuracy was about 75%, people were annoyed. The results seemed like crap.
At 80-85%, people would use it, but didn't really find it trustworthy. Above 90% started to feel natural. 2/3