@ThePatriotOasis 🤣🤣🤣 new fake hero!!! Awesome
New fake hero without fear 🤣🤣🤣
Nobody thinking by head only fuck news and speech of politics….rest information do not matter becomes 96% in world are garbages
@Breaking911 Vertical Speed was 28250 feet/min ?????
So it’s damm))))) aircraft can not to support such structure tens and according aerodynamic laws - such air flow gave very very high “Reynolds point” and no power to support good and adequate lift power
Lie!
@airmainengineer Vertical Speed was 28250 feet/min ?????
So it’s damm))))) aircraft can not to support such structure tens and according aerodynamic laws - such air flow gave very very high “Reynolds point” and no power to support good and adequate lift power
Lie!
#aviation
@CBSNews Vertical Speed was 28250 feet/min ?????
So it’s damm))))) aircraft can not to support such structure tens and according aerodynamic laws - such air flow gave very very high “Reynolds point” and no power to support good and adequate lift power
Lie!
@NBCNews Vertical Speed was 28250 feet/min ?????
So it’s damm))))) aircraft can not to support such structure tens and according aerodynamic laws - such air flow gave very very high “Reynolds point” and no power to support good and adequate lift power
Lie!
@nexta_tv Vertical Speed was 28250 feet/min ?????
So it’s damm))))) aircraft can not to support such structure tens and according aerodynamic laws - such air flow gave very very high “Reynolds point” and no power to support good and adequate lift power
Lie!
And how on earth was the aeroplane then able to be controlled from such extreme and unusual positions after the descent, if the crew were incompetent, whilst the other pilots (who, strangely enough, happened to be there) managed to do everything in the cockpit in a matter of seconds without realising – situational awareness
@Turbinetraveler The laminar flow on the surfaces of both the control surfaces and the auxiliary surfaces then breaks down into very severe turbulence, which essentially prevents the restoration of uniform airflow in the future
@MOSSADil Vertical Speed was 28250 feet/min ?????
So it’s damm))))) aircraft can not to support such structure tens and according aerodynamic laws - such air flow gave very very high “Reynolds point” and no power to support good and adequate lift power
Lie!
@MarioNawfal Vertical Speed was 28250 feet/min ?????
So it’s damm))))) aircraft can not to support such structure tens and according aerodynamic laws - such air flow gave very very high “Reynolds point” and no power to support good and adequate lift power
Lie!
@AJEnglish Vertical Speed was 28250 feet/min ?????
So it’s damm))))) aircraft can not to support such structure tens and according aerodynamic laws - such air flow gave very very high “Reynolds point” and no power to support good and adequate lift power
Lie!
@DrewPavlou Vertical Speed was 28250 feet/min ?????
So it’s damm))))) aircraft can not to support such structure tens and according aerodynamic laws - such air flow gave very very high “Reynolds point” and no power to support good and adequate lift power
Lie!
Vertical Speed was 28250 feet/min ?????
So it’s damm))))) aircraft can not to support such structure tens and according aerodynamic laws - such air flow gave very very high “Reynolds point” and no power to support good and adequate lift power
Lie!
Fake news for garbage people and for people who not know aerodynamic and physik
Vertical Speed was 28250 feet/min ?????
So it’s damm))))) aircraft can not to support such structure tens and according aerodynamic laws - such air flow gave very very high “Reynolds point” and no power to support good and adequate lift power
Lie!
Fake news for garbage people who out knowledge and normal education
@peteirishpilot Vertical Speed was 28250 feet/min ?????
So it’s damm))))) aircraft can not to support such structure tens and according aerodynamic laws - such air flow gave very very high “Reynolds point” and no power to support good and adequate lift power
Lie!