Ein Messerverbot ist die wohl sinn- und hilfloseste politische Forderung aller Zeiten.
So dumm und plump, dass es einer Verhöhnung der Menschen gleichkommt.
1/6
Nein, die Arbeitnehmer in Deutschland sind nicht zu faul.
Die Vorschläge, wie man Arbeiten wieder attraktiver macht, finde ich zunehmend absurd. Vor allem, dass Überstunden steuerfrei sein sollen.
Statt Überstunden steuerfrei zu stellen, sollten vielmehr die „normalen“ Arbeitsstunden steuerlich entlastet werden.
Überstunden attraktiver zu machen, impliziert, dass in Deutschland aus Faulheit wenig gearbeitet würde. Das stimmt einfach nicht.
Viele, vor allem immer noch Frauen, werden in Teilzeitverhältnisse gezwungen, weil die Kinderbetreuung nicht ganztags verfügbar ist. Oder oft müssen auch Angehörige gepflegt werden.
Zudem: Gehaltserhöhungen, die mit Fleiß und Einsatz erarbeitet werden, machen sich netto kaum bemerkbar. Das bremst die Motivation.
Meine Meinung: Die aktuelle Diskussion sendet ein falsches Signal. Die Überstunde sollte nicht zur Regel werden, denn dann ist in der Personalplanung etwas gehörig schief gelaufen. Die Gleichung mehr Arbeitszeit = mehr Produktivität stimmt einfach nicht.
Was ist eure Meinung zur Diskussion über steuerfreie Überstunden?
#work #deutschland #zukunft
You'll Never Walk Alone so groß ankündigen und dann vor Ende wegblenden.
Ihr habt den Verlust der Bundesliga echt verdient @DAZN_DE. Und die Insolvenz auch. #BVBPSG
@Franzsh Fühl ich sehr. Kann mir kaum die pauschalen Aussagen zum Verhalten von autistischen Kindern reinziehen, die da grad so getätigt werden. Und ähnlich plump scheint die Strategie von neurotypischen Menschen bei der Suche zu sein.
@TatiSchatzi13 Im autistischen Spektrum gibt es viele Kinder mit Weglauftendenz. Dazu braucht es keinen Auslöser wie familiäre Probleme. Es geht dabei auch nicht darum dem Zuhause zu entkommen.
@dabbo23@UltraDane There are only subspecies. And all of them together make the species. So what should brown people be? The species above all? Maybe there it started, but africans also changed, like every other subspecies did, to became the modern african.
You’ve asked me several questions on this thread and accused me of avoiding answering, so here goes.
I believe a woman is a human being who belongs to the sex class that produces large gametes. It’s irrelevant whether or not her gametes have ever been fertilised, whether or not she’s carried a baby to term, irrelevant if she was born with a rare difference of sexual development that makes neither of the above possible, or if she’s aged beyond being able to produce viable eggs. She is a woman and just as much a woman as the others.
I don’t believe a woman is more or less of a woman for having sex with men, women, both or not wanting sex at all. I don’t think a woman is more or less of a woman for having a buzz cut and liking suits and ties, or wearing stilettos and mini dresses, for being black, white or brown, for being six feet tall or a little person, for being kind or cruel, angry or sad, loud or retiring. She isn't more of a woman for featuring in Playboy or being a surrendered wife, nor less of a woman for designing space rockets or taking up boxing. What makes her a woman is the fact of being born in a body that, assuming nothing has gone wrong in her physical development (which, as stated above, still doesn't stop her being a woman), is geared towards producing eggs as opposed to sperm, towards bearing as opposed to begetting children, and irrespective of whether she's done either of those things, or ever wants to.
Womanhood isn't a mystical state of being, nor is it measured by how well one apes sex stereotypes. We are not the creatures either porn or the Bible tell you we are. Femaleness is not, as trans woman Andrea Chu Long wrote, ‘an open mouth, an expectant asshole, blank, blank eyes,’ nor are we God’s afterthought, sprung from Adam’s rib.
Women are provably subject to certain experiences because of our female bodies, including different forms of oppression, depending on the cultures in which we live. When trans activists say 'I thought you didn't want to be defined by your biology,' it’s a feeble and transparent attempt at linguistic sleight of hand. Women don't want to be limited, exploited, punished, or subject to other unjust treatment because of their biology, but our being female is indeed defined by our biology. It's one material fact about us, like having freckles or disliking beetroot, neither of which are representative of our entire beings, either. Women have billions of different personalities and life stories, which have nothing to do with our bodies, although we are likely to have had experiences men don't and can't, because we belong to our sex class.
Some people feel strongly that they should have been, or wish to be seen as, the sex class into which they weren't born. Gender dysphoria is a real and very painful condition and I feel nothing but sympathy for anyone who suffers from it. I want them to be free to dress and present themselves however they like and I want them to have exactly the same rights as every other citizen regarding housing, employment and personal safety. I do not, however, believe that surgeries and cross-sex hormones literally turn a person into the opposite sex, nor do I believe in the idea that each of us has a nebulous ‘gender identity’ that may or might not match our sexed bodies. I believe the ideology that preaches those tenets has caused, and continues to cause, very real harm to vulnerable people.
I am strongly against women's and girls' rights and protections being dismantled to accommodate trans-identified men, for the very simple reason that no study has ever demonstrated that trans-identified men don't have exactly the same pattern of criminality as other men, and because, however they identify, men retain their advantages of speed and strength. In other words, I think the safety and rights of girls and women are more important than those men's desire for validation.
I sincerely hope that answers your questions. You may still disagree, but as I hope this shows, I’m more than happy to have this debate.
I’m a mother of six, and a Mormon. I have a good understanding of arguments surrounding abortion, religious and otherwise. I've been listening to men grandstand about women's reproductive rights, and I'm convinced men actually have zero interest in stopping abortion. Here's why…
@reoledel@Zora_im_Exil Autisten können oft extrem gut differenzieren und betrachten Dinge (innerlich) sehr emotional. Denke das führt eher dazu, dass man sich eben nicht schwarz-weiss-mäßig auf eine Seite schlägt. Ich finde es ganz schwierig hier ihre Neurodiversität als Grund aufzuführen, sorry.
@reoledel@Zora_im_Exil Ich denke für scheiß Meinungen muss es nicht immer einen Grund geben. Und schon mal gar nicht pauschal Asperger Autismus als Ursache für Antisemitismus. Und Menschen mit scheiss Gedankengut sind auch nicht direkt unzurechnungsfähig, sondern vielleicht einfach nur scheisse.
@Elkmann1000@Zauberin1310@Vorzimmerdame2@Simkr20 Asperger Syndrom gibt es so als Diagnose nicht. Greta ist Autistin. Autismus ist ein Spektrum. Die pauschale Aussage am Ende ist ebenfalls Quatsch
@ClaasGefroi Auf dem Land oder in dörflicher Gegend darf dann gnadenlos der Frust fehlender Kitas und Co von der Seele gekifft werden, auch ein schöner Ansatz
My autistic passion for justice is something I have to keep in check, because it can easily turn into intense rage, bitterness or a desire for vengeance (for me). I choose my battles carefully and let go of what I can, because focusing too much on justice is like drinking poison.