@mattyglesias The whole article (and a lot of similar AI commentary) is precariously balanced on this clause: "If we create robust institutions to redistribute the material gains from the intelligence explosion...." Isn't it reasonable to worry that won't happen?
@TheStalwart This assumes you want to scale your software, distribute it, and make money off it. Or, more fundamentally, it assumes you need to make money / generate equity value to compensate the people who spent the weekend building the website.
@petereharrell Unless the decision radically redefines what an "emergency" is, though, it won't change his ability to impose sanctions quickly. He obviously likes tariffs more, but are you worried that he'll start using sanctions rather than wait 3-6 months to impose targeted tariffs?
@Brad_Setser Maybe we're getting too hung up on the term export. Seems likely the H20s are not being exported from the US and the BIS licenses are reexport licenses. So the "tax" could reach as far as the foreign direct product rule. (Still terrible, obviously.)
@jordanschneider Yeah I was surprised by this positive take. Security was always the hard part to negotiate and they just hand-waved it away. Will the US really blow up the deal after all this fanfare because UAE refuses to accept some security requirement?
@dylan522p Isn't this a bad version of the likely outcome under AI diffusion if hyperscalers had UVEU and g42 got NVEU? The differences are 1. UVEUs were just ratio limited 2. No security requirements set in advance here and 3. more leverage for UAE in negotiations with hyperscalers.
@dylan522p The Wikipedia article explicitly says this wasn't related to the AC vs DC thing, but you can replace that link with a citation to Bob's Burgers.
@ohlennart@xai Do you have any guesses on where they expect (or thoughts on where they should expect) companies to draw the line for what a single cluster is? They removed the part of the eo language that required the compute to be in the same physical building, but they kept the DCN term.
@mattyglesias So the fact that it didn't unify literally 100% of people who can get into Harris rallies is proof there was no benefit in picking a candidate that most Dem stakeholders generally signaled was their preferred pick?
Also, "an ask that was made" shows this is really a stretch.
@rkylesmith Let's apply the "what if Republicans could do it?" standard. They 100% will bring any case they can against Biden, and Trump tried to do it with Hillary. Their "problem" is that there aren't any crimes, but if Republicans had even half the case that Bragg did they'd go for it.
@maasalan I don't think the issue is addressed by the general license in the ITSR. FAQ 1088 still requires a level of due diligence that is hard to scale, and I think the way to improve the situation is to push OFAC to relax this. https://t.co/e3mnEROMId
@coloradotravis@TheStalwart When I lived in DC, a person asking the question was painted as trying to learn what people did so the questioner could decide how to use those people to advance the questioner's career. Maybe that was true if like hill interns were asking, but otherwise seemed self-important.
@jordanschneider If that ad came on while I was listening to another Odd Lots episode about rescuing banks or whatever it would definitely catch my interest.