A Goldberg

Georgia Peach libertarian fiscal conservative Entomologist/Biologist/Educator

[DNI Tulsi Gabbard @DNIGabbard]

Today, on my final day as Director of National Intelligence, I’m releasing never-before-seen communications and documents exposing how Dr. Fauci provided millions in US taxpayer dollars to fund dangerous gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab, worked with politicized elements within the Intelligence Community to suppress the truth about his actions and hide the virus’ lab-leak origins, and lied to Congress while under oath in 2024. It’s time you know the truth.

https://t.co/3YJSstB7d4

[A Goldberg @agapeach84]

@LisaFuller14999 no one HATES her 🙄 she is fake, her over the top Christian persona isnt believable and she is going against everything Charlie ever stood for

[A Goldberg @agapeach84]

@ThrillaRilla369 yes 💯 rather a father bring his little girls in the ladies room than taking them in a mens room

[A Goldberg @agapeach84]

@M0PEi @_FeintOfHearts @LionelMedia @RealCandaceO there is no stacked evidence🙄 main proof official narrative is BS is that charlie wasnt hit w 30/6 round

[Zach Costello @ZachCostello_]

The FBI thought they were dunking on Candace Owens, in reality they just dunked on themselves.

They "caught" Candace by attributing a direct quote to her accurate paraphrasing of the response letter they sent to her.

Candace makes a relatively simple request of Kash Patel's travel schedule the days leading up to Charlie Kirks assassination. The FBI responds in typical government, bureaucratic, "you're not worthy of seeing this," language referring to some "unusual circumstances" law that was made up so they could hide stuff from us...

It's not that complicated to screen shot Kash Patels calendar from Sept 8th to 10th... Anyone else could do this within minutes. This is just the FBI giving the middle finger to Candace Owens, and pretending it's something else.

And yes, that middle finger line above is an analogy. Next thing we know the FBI Rapid Retard Team, I mean Response team, will respond with a "debunking" proving they in fact did not literally give the middle finger in the response letter.

[A Goldberg @agapeach84]

@LionelMedia ive been burned by so many the last year that have turned MIGA but You, Ian, Candice, Tucker, Baron, Robert G are ones i still trust

[Candace Owens @RealCandaceO]

Surprise evening show tonight!

-Tucker lets the cat out of the bag regarding Butler. Dan Bongino completely melts down and seems like he’s lying…and leaking to the New York Times about Epstein.
-I suddenly have a memory about Charlie that is deeply troubling regarding Summer 2025.
-We receive a weird response on our FOIA request for SAM702.

Join us LIVE!

https://t.co/dvlttp3eVo

[A Goldberg @agapeach84]

@dbongino your welcome for embarrassing yourself yet again?

[A Goldberg @agapeach84]

@farmingandJesus @johannesmkx @Wanderingbusker its has been excused and allowed

[The DarkHorse Podcast @thedarkhorsepod]

Bret Weinstein cuts straight to the chase:

"We are going to have an endless battle in which those of us who see what we believe is clear evidence of some kind of election rigging or fraud are faced with indignation from a vast array of people portraying themselves as more rigorous and careful who say, 'Where is your evidence? Where exactly is your evidence that there was something wrong with this election?' And we are gonna be caught in the following predicament.

No piece of evidence is sufficient to establish that case. And the sum total of all of the evidence contains true things and false things. So it is also no good.

So the question is, can you logically deduce that something has gone wrong? I believe you can easily.

Can you prove it? No.

And not being able to prove it means that the election will proceed. It will be validated by all of the structures, including the courts. And that means that those who take on the power that derives from these elections will be the result of whatever process we just went through, whether it was an election that happened to be anomalous through organic means, or it was the result of some kind of fraud or election rigging. That is not an accident.

That is not an accident.

And the point that I wanna make primarily is the primary evidence against elections that look like this being organic is not actually in the trickle of evidence that we are actually able to see, the moment by moment vote count that does something strange during the night when some large tranche of ballots is suddenly counted or something like that.

The evidence is in the structure of how the elections are actually carried out. These elections are designed to allow fraud that cannot be detected and will not be prosecuted. And that's really the thing that we must focus on."

@BretWeinstein

[A Goldberg @agapeach84]

@Serenitee_Sam “can i call 911” while in the back of a police car is insane behavior

[A Goldberg @agapeach84]

@realsashastone its her performative over the top Christian stitch that doesnt match her actions is what really bothers me about her people can see she isnt genuine

[A Goldberg @agapeach84]

@RealCandaceO the fact they keep pushing u and charlie werent friends just bc u werent at his wedding when you had just given birth to your first child is so dumb🤬 it was also during peak covid nonsense, no way id be traveling w a few month old.

[A Goldberg @agapeach84]

@BlakeSNeff imagine if you goons at tpusa actually had the integrity that Charlie had an havent ruined everything he built in leas than a year….. you guys really need to gain some self awareness

[A Goldberg @agapeach84]

@BlakeSNeff stop gaslighting blake we can see how ridiculous this WiDoW stunt is….. u need to learn to stop before you completely embarrass yoursekdf

[A Goldberg @agapeach84]

@LunaJay171496 @GigglingGanon no its bc she has never been accountable and allowed to act like a horribleperson

[A Goldberg @agapeach84]

@GigglingGanon this is what teachers deal with daily…

[Scrophularia Lanceolta @iGrowPrairie]

@DisgracedProp 1) People who don't want to believe what their eyes tell them say, "show me proof of fraud".

2) You show them proof of fraud.

3) Willfully blind people respond "that doesn't prove anything".

They're not looking for proof, they are looking for an admission which isn't coming.

[Disgraced Propagandist @DisgracedProp]

People demanding "proof" of election fraud are not understanding how crime works. I worked at Manhattan DA for over 2 years, one in Homicide. We never had video proof of the crime. We almost never had DNA. These are things that occur on CSI on TV, not in real life. And we still convicted people all the time.

What we had was testimony and circumstantial evidence. Travel times, bank records, cell phone data, gate access codes. Motive, capability, benefit, time and place. Never direct proof. Of course the defendant always denied the crime, but there was enough evidence to show that one had to have occurred nonetheless.

If what we have in the LA Mayoral election is a statistical anomaly that is beyond reasonable explanation with anything besides fraud, that is enough to prove a crime. This has been true since the beginning of Western Civlization.

[A Goldberg @agapeach84]

@EndWokeness @ChuckRossDC he should have left the tent when asked the first time AND not stab someone these people are so ignorant