This is the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights. They're your human rights. Nations worldwide got together & determined them in 1948. Many of them are being trampled on and ignored by governments and organisations. It's the UN's duty to uphold them. https://t.co/2qwGRSd0Tf
@AllisonPearson They're complaining about the symptoms and ignoring the cause.
Their priorities are reversed and they can't judge levels of importance.
Britain in a nutshell after any atrocity:
"This is what you should say, this is what you shouldn't say, this is what you should feel, this is what you shouldn't feel."
Everyone's opinionated about what is proper.
People are fighting over what's the correct response!
Instead of correcting what caused the atrocity, whether we do it in grief or rage or a stiff upper lip.
What we should DO is another matter and few in authority are capable of confronting that reality, so they'll confront and fight over what the proper language to use is when digging a grave.
The truth is there IS no proper! Feel and say what is true for you. Others who feel the same way will agree, others who don't, won't.
Those who insist they're on the correct side are pretending they're sitting on the moral high ground, the shadow of which is looming over the West, darkening our lives with sermons on wrongthink and rightbehaviour.
And part of how this has been achieved is by vilifying emotions and speech. The new moral priesthood insists "you shouldn't say that and you must feel this and if you don't agree you will be cast out."
And so we take a vow of tolerance and make sure we keep quiet so we don't upset anyone including the killers.
It's killing us.
Feel how you feel but then do what you know to be right that works in reality to make things better for everyone.
There will be arguments about what is the right thing to do and how to do it but try to stick to the important points, like what size spade to use instead of insisting we call it a shovel.
"Whipping it up for the own ends."
OMFG. That's what she's concerned about. Not the savage headhunter!
Yes, they are using it for the own ends and I'm glad they are. Their ends are to get this monster and others like him out of our lands and they want to tell me this.
And I'm very happy to hear it and so are tens of millions of others!
@AllisonPearson@Channel4News Exactly. They're always more concerned with controlling your reaction instead of controlling the crimes. https://t.co/qspvZQGdhR
He is always FAR more concerned with the outrage and the fear of that outrage than he is with the wrongdoing which caused the outrage and he goes out of his way to punish the outraged,thereby preventing anyone from being outraged.But he does nothing about thing CAUSING the outrage.
So he leaves whatever harmful, festering thing among people who are no longer allowed to be upset but can't do anything about the harmful thing because if they communicate about it they will be branded as outrageous and punished.
It's such a mystery why he's hated 🙄
It's as ridiculous as having a sick patient and leaving the bacteria in the body and then smacking the patient later when they feel sick.
Starmer does everything to suppress the symptoms instead of dealing with the cause.
He is very harmful to our country.
@RWTaylors He has no concept of relative importance.What you call these savages is relatively unimportant compared to what you do about them.
What the British people have had enough of is you lot arguing about the language and words instead of dealing with murderers & rapists in our midst.
"We identified in 2011 that fluoride accumulation in jaw tissue amplifies USAG-1 expression by up to 340%. The more fluoride in the bone, the stronger the suppression. We submitted the paper. Rejected by every journal in 6 weeks. Funding pulled 3 months later. I was told the direction was 'not commercially viable.'"
@columeastwood Stop worrying about the reactions of people and their responses and start worrying about the cause of the problem!
If you prevented the cause, you wouldn't care about the symptoms because there wouldn't be any.
As it grew to any valuable size @UKLabour would feed off it hungrily by taxing it until it was no longer able to grow.Further regulation costs would prevent its innovation and expansion and eventually it would be an exhausted beast,sold off to a foreign nation for what little its worth.
The best thing you could do would be to get out of its way.
@CraigBrockie@brettboettcher1 Yes. Doing what you can easily do and continuing that is a great way to improve and maintain health. https://t.co/6RnrZzUgNY
The way to get healthy and maintain health over a lifetime is to do some exercise that is easy for you and then keep doing it. I'm 48 and this is what I do. This thread is particularly aimed at lazy people who can't be arsed but still know they should stay healthy & want to try.
The way to get healthy and maintain health over a lifetime is to do some exercise that is easy for you and then keep doing it. I'm 48 and this is what I do. This thread is particularly aimed at lazy people who can't be arsed but still know they should stay healthy & want to try.
He is always FAR more concerned with the outrage and the fear of that outrage than he is with the wrongdoing which caused the outrage and he goes out of his way to punish the outraged,thereby preventing anyone from being outraged.But he does nothing about thing CAUSING the outrage.
So he leaves whatever harmful, festering thing among people who are no longer allowed to be upset but can't do anything about the harmful thing because if they communicate about it they will be branded as outrageous and punished.
It's such a mystery why he's hated 🙄
It's as ridiculous as having a sick patient and leaving the bacteria in the body and then smacking the patient later when they feel sick.
Starmer does everything to suppress the symptoms instead of dealing with the cause.
He is very harmful to our country.
Britain in a nutshell after any atrocity:
"This is what you should say, this is what you shouldn't say, this is what you should feel, this is what you shouldn't feel."
Everyone's opinionated about what is proper.
People are fighting over what's the correct response!
Instead of correcting what caused the atrocity, whether we do it in grief or rage or a stiff upper lip.
What we should DO is another matter and few in authority are capable of confronting that reality, so they'll confront and fight over what the proper language to use is when digging a grave.
The truth is there IS no proper! Feel and say what is true for you. Others who feel the same way will agree, others who don't, won't.
Those who insist they're on the correct side are pretending they're sitting on the moral high ground, the shadow of which is looming over the West, darkening our lives with sermons on wrongthink and rightbehaviour.
And part of how this has been achieved is by vilifying emotions and speech. The new moral priesthood insists "you shouldn't say that and you must feel this and if you don't agree you will be cast out."
And so we take a vow of tolerance and make sure we keep quiet so we don't upset anyone including the killers.
It's killing us.
Feel how you feel but then do what you know to be right that works in reality to make things better for everyone.
There will be arguments about what is the right thing to do and how to do it but try to stick to the important points, like what size spade to use instead of insisting we call it a shovel.
What's happening broadly across our society is it's no longer worth doing the good thing because the punishment is so great for possibly doing it wrong so it's safer to just do nothing.
It's injustice and it's totally destroying the natural willingness of good people to prevent harm.
Basically when you make the punishment greater than the purpose, then it becomes too dangerous to follow the purpose and then people do nothing.
Investors call it the risk to reward ratio. Same principle.
It doesn't matter if it's in trying to protect someone's life from a murderer, preventing shoplifting or working as a doctor and giving medicine. If you make the slightest error, you're so heavily punished that it's not worth the risk. So you do nothing and wait for an authority, by which time the victim is dead.
Is it worth doing this good thing or will I go to prison because I made a mistake?
And our society, through an unjust system, both legal and social, has made the punishment too great compared to the purpose of doing something, that good people are no longer willing to do good. And that is a disaster for a culture.
@engineers_feed Battery research will eventually lead us to what we've already got. We need to develop proper nuclear technology. https://t.co/euZXxJzoxD
The end game of battery technology is to create matter.
We want to end up with a material that stores vast amounts of energy stably forever,in a tiny container that we can use whenever.
That's matter. Nature already did that for us.
We just need to learn to drain it correctly.
@elonmusk@Coinvo A country is built by its ideas, its morals, its education. The people create what a country is, not the money or materials. The thoughts of the people translate into actions which influence and handle the environment and turn it into what it becomes.
It's the false idea that something is more correct if more people agree with it.
The truth actually needs no agreement.
But reality and our social order are strongly governed by it and things seem truer if everyone agrees.
Basically agreement holds the framework of a group together.