Glad everyone else is noticing that Codex usage limits have been destroyed.
>It’s draining as fast as 5hr limit. But weekly
>Cheaper models, are seeming to drain our quota just as fast.
>20x plans feel like 5x
“5.6 is extremely efficient, and costs just as much as 5.5” yeahh right.
Sorry but Codex Usage limits are terrible now?
Yesterday, i only used 5.6 sol high, i let it running in a /goal, configured cheaper terra/ lunar subagents.
I come back 40% of my total weekly usage is gone? ( 20x)
BTW i was using multiple 5.6 Sol xhigh + Max, all day everyday, last week.
Id rather get no resets, steady and fair usage, as opposed to getting resets, but every time they do, they reduce our quota.
They also removed the invite friends for banked resets.
Anyone else noticing this? Just gets worse by the day.
@TheAppleDesign Its a symbiotic relation, to think one is better than the other shows you don't understand how business works. Samsung is the main display (other than LG) supplier for the upcoming iphone. Samsung was the one of the first to pioneer the folding display tech. @grok
This is a prime example of the info gap in local AI.
Most people think Qwen3.6 27B is the best, so they run it on a 128GB Mac.
But MLX is actually optimized for MoE, not dense models, fully leveraging that massive unified RAM.
Running a 27B dense model is obviously going to be painfully slow and frustrating.
Meanwhile, running the dq version of Minimax-M3.0 or Deepseek-v4-Flash is a way smoother experience.
The catch? No frontier AI can tell you this. You can't search for it, and knowledge cutoffs mean they don't have the latest facts.
This exact info gap is why people keep saying local AI is years behind.
Just look at the latest info on experts' X accounts and follow what they do.