Airborne03

[Kat Cammack @Kat_Cammack]

You read that right. There are NO background checks for Congressional staff. H.Res 500 would require background checks and full disclosure of dual citizenship and employment of foreign nations for staff. No surprise to anyone that we are being fought every step of the way. You can help us make sure all Capitol Hill staff get background checks by calling your Rep!

[Chris Martz @ChrisMartzWX]

Thankfully I have numbers rather than opinions.

The average number of days per year in the U.S. reaching 95°F was ~18% lower during the 60-year period 1961 to 2020 compared to 1901 to 1960.

The number of days reaching 100°F and 105°F have also declined since 1895.

[Nick Sortor @nicksortor]

🔥 HELL YES! The Trump DOJ has just activated a NEVER before used ALIEN TERRORIST REMOVAL COURT

This allows for the admin to RAPIDLY DEPORT illegals deemed terrorists (such as Tren de Aragua) AND their family members

Much of the proceedings are done in classified settings, and the illegal CANNOT play the asylum card during these proceedings.

The court was established by Congress in 1996 and just received its first EVER filing just days ago. It’s currently under seal.

RAMP THIS UP, General Blanche! 🔥

[Ron DeSantis @RonDeSantis]

Low-hanging fruit.

Stop the CCP student visas!

[Catherine Herridge @C__Herridge]

BURN BAGS: According to President Trump, the burn bags were supposed to be destroyed.

Burns bags discovered at FBI HQ contained sensitive and, in some cases, never before records: Russia Collusion probes, Mar-a-Lago, CIA referral to FBI on 2016 Hillary Clinton election activities (previously thought to be missing.)

RETALIATION: AGAINST the whistleblower who exposed the suppression of the 2020 China intelligence was severe and pervasive.

Time to make things right for the whistleblower.

[LB @beyondreasdoubt]

JJ Watt is just an incredible human being

[Wall Street Apes @WallStreetApes]

WOAH 🚨 Investigative journalist Catherine Herridge reviewed the documents just released by the Trump Admin on election integrity and finds CIA emails showing they were working against Donald Trump to aid China and the Democrats in the 2020 election

“I've been digging into the documents already and I found this November 2020 email, and it specifically states, it's a conversation among intelligence officials, it specifically states that they have, quote, deliberately massaged one of our pending PDBs. That's the president's daily brief. To avoid any direct links to the election”

“This was a massive effort, what they call a multi-domain operation. That means trade, it means diplomacy, it means open-source information, it means social media. So all the levers of power China had to influence the US election”

And our own CIA worked to make sure the r President wasn’t aware of any of this information, they literally removed it from his daily briefing

Literally treason

“In the summer of 2020, as we're heading into the election, in the intelligence community there were indicators of this Chinese influence operation. Influence operations means that you're trying to affect the outcome of how people vote or their sentiment about a presidential candidate.
It's different than an interference operation, which is penetrating voting rolls and voter systems. And this whistleblower was raising the alarm about the influence operation, and then suddenly it all was suppressed”

“In some of their reports, there were in officials' own handwriting that they wanted everything out that could help President Trump in his reelection. So there was clear evidence of political and personal bias”

They wanted to remove EVERYTHING that could possibly help Trump win reelection

Again, literally treason

Also if you remember awhile back, a former CIA officer named Pedro Israel Orta who worked at the CIA during the Trump Administration said the CIA didn’t even recognize him as the President, they wouldn’t even put his picture up on the wall which was customary for all Presidents

They were actively working against him

[Lee Kuan Yimby @LeeKuanYimby]

This speech from Zohran Mamdani on America’s 250th changed my politics.

I’ve never seen a more pompous individual whose life has been void of any sacrifice or hard work confidently lecture as if people like him hold the key to human prosperity.

Here’s a guy who had never held a job until he found the angle to satisfy his thirst for attention through politics at age 30, sit behind George Washington’s desk and give us a lecture on what is supposed to be a day of celebration.

Instead of celebrating what this country built, prosperity and human rights that spread across the globe from basically nothing, he turns the moment into a lecture about how America is this flawed project desperately in need of topdown change from useless academics and politicians who’ve never built anything of value for anybody.

As I get older, I have started wrestling with my own ridiculous and undeserved comforts, and the massive sacrifices of generations that made them possible. We should be expressing sheer gratitude for the families who crossed this country in covered wagons chasing a future, for the young men who died in muddy fields and frozen trenches defending it. At some point we let the children forget about this, and it's going to be a tragedy.

Our ancestors didn’t sacrifice so we could sit around demanding more redistribution while building nothing of value ourselves and living in opulence kings couldn't have dreamed of. They built something exceptional through risk, and relentless work.

Watching someone like Mamdani use the 250th as an opportunity to lecture us about what’s wrong with America, it just flips a switch for me. I’m done with the ingratitude.

We need to defend America from those that leech off it's greatness and attempt to redefine it.

[Gregory K Bovino @GregoryKBovino]

Thanks @nicksortor . When illegal aliens are forced to leave on their own, it benefits everyone in every facet of society. It also buttons them down so they aren’t out hurting Americans or ICE Agents. Mass deportations on a large scale should commence at once!!

[Batya Ungar-Sargon @bungarsargon]

Americans are very generous, but they draw the line when someone has been granted the immense privilege of American citizenship, then throws that gift in our faces by insisting that America on its own is trash—and needs them to reshape us in the image of the place they left.

[Chief_Engineer @ChiefEngineerCE]

To those in the future that think Americans never fought back against uncontrolled immigration and who think we have never pushed back before,

In 1919 America had enough.

The globalists do not teach this lesson about our history...

After World War I the country was flooded with millions of immigrants in a very short time. Many refused to assimilate. Labor strikes paralyzed cities. Bombs were mailed to politicians and businessmen. Radical anarchists and communists openly called for the overthrow of the United States. Crime and unrest exploded in major cities.

The American people reached their limit.

What followed was called the Red Summer and the Palmer Raids. The government rounded up thousands of radicals, many of them recent immigrants. Ships were loaded and they were sent back to Europe. In some cases even American-born children of immigrants were deported with their parents if the family was deeply involved in revolutionary activity.

Then came the Immigration Act of 1924. It slammed the door shut. National origins quotas were put in place. Immigration from certain countries was cut by over 90%. The message was clear: America was for Americans first. We needed time to assimilate the people already here and restore order.

That policy worked. Immigration dropped dramatically. Wages for American workers rose. Assimilation improved. The country stabilized and the greatest middle class in history was built in the decades that followed.

We are at a similar moment today.

Once again our borders have been wide open. Once again our cities are strained. Once again American workers are pushed aside. Once again many newcomers show little interest in becoming American.

The lesson from 1919 is simple: when Americans decide they have had enough, they will act. They will vote. They will demand enforcement. They will change the laws. And yes, they will put their own people first.

We are not the first generation to feel this way.

We are simply the latest one that is finally willing to do what is necessary to take our country back.

Has the time has come again.

[Erick Erickson @EWErickson]

“And what about our sins? Slavery was the original sin, and I won’t sand it down. The founders knew it. Jefferson knew it, and he owned slaves — the hypocrisy was staring right at them, and they kept kicking the can down the road. But here is what a poisoned telling of our history leaves out: the New England colonies began rejecting slavery before England itself did. And when the reckoning finally came, hundreds of thousands of men died on battlefields to make other men free. “As He died to make men holy, let us die to make men free,” read the original lyrics of the Battle Hymn of the Republic. That’s propitiation. One man suffers so others go free. A nation that will bleed that much to right its own wrong is not an evil nation. It is a great one, straining toward becoming a more perfect one. We had a black president. We had a black vice president. Our Secretary of State is the son of Cuban refugees. Anyone telling you the story that nothing here ever gets better is selling you something.”

https://t.co/x00baUJNoo

[Ron DeSantis @RonDeSantis]

If a foreigner hates America, fine. But why then become a citizen here? Better yet, why would the US allow someone to become a citizen who hates the country?

[Justine Bateman @JustineBateman]

What an absolute joke this guy is. A clown.

[John Ʌ Konrad V @johnkonrad]

“They tell you America belongs only to those with the right accent or skin color.”

Go fuck yourself, pinko.

I’m from the Bronx. Son of FDNY and a visiting nurse. You have no idea the hardships my family faced helping poor Americans.

Keyword: Americans

And don’t you dare tell me we Republicans don’t welcome immigrants.

Trump is married to an immigrant.

Vance is married to the daughter of immigrants.

Rubio is the son of immigrants.

My posts about @HungCao_VA consistently get more support from the right than anything else I post.

He fled communist Vietnam by way of Africa. He wasn’t born Christian. Yet MAGA loves him.

He served this nation and is not a Hollywood nepobaby like you. He hates fraud.

But the real difference isn’t his accent or ethnicity. It’s that he hates communists.

That’s the bare minimum level bud: honesty when you applied for citizenship.

You lied, ergo we hate you.

You need to go.

[Chris Pratt @prattprattpratt]

Celebrate America’s 250th birthday at the box office!!! There’s a lot of great choices this weekend. But considering it’s July 4 weekend I humbly suggest “Young, Washington.” I was actually blown away. The movie is incredible. Like Braveheart for Americans. Jon Erwin crushed it. William Franklin Miller did a great job as young Washington. Remember the name! A star is born! The movie is awesome! Way to go!!

[Roger Severino @RogerSeverino_]

Dear @VP @JDVance, I was honored to see you endorse my idea of prohibiting birth tourism citizenship in U.S. Territories (which China has exploited to the hilt), and I'd like to offer you some even bolder ideas to save our national sovereignty.

So far, solutions to the Anchor Baby problem have focused on the "anchors," but the SCOTUS decision requires renewing focus on the "boats" they tether and ending their incentives to give birth here. Here’s how.

Take all the conditions in the original Trump EO and direct all the consequences onto foreigners who exploit "loophole citizenship" by declaring them PERSONA NON GRATA.

Specifically, if an alien without legal permanent residency chooses to have a child on U.S. soil, the foreigner parents must either renounce the child’s American citizenship or lose the ability to ever again legally step foot in the U.S., their choice.

Under the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. § 1182(f)), the President has broad power to suspend or restrict entry of any class of foreign nationals the President determines would be “detrimental to the interests of the United States.” The President should use this authority to deem such foreigners:

1) permanently ineligible for U.S. entry under any visa type (whether visitor, student, work, or otherwise)

2) permanently ineligible to petition for asylum, refugee, or temporary protected status

3) permanently ineligible for lottery or family based entry

4) permanently ineligible to petition for any legal residency or U.S. citizenship whatsover, including by future marriage to an American citizen.

Foreigners cynically use their children as tools to get lawful access to the U.S., its resources, and its opportunities that were paid for in blood and treasure by generations of Americans that came before. Forever shut the door to that access and birth tourism would plummet overnight.

But what about the people who would defy any ban or are already here illegally? That’s a tougher problem, but still addressable. The lawbreakers would have know that if they exploit “loophole citizenship” and choose not to renounce their child’s U.S. citizenship, they will have automatically moved themselves up on the deportation tracking and priority list.

The president can also exercise his discretion under the INA to strip away common procedural tools immigration lawyers use to delay or withhold removal and can require expedited deportation once they are caught as we currently do with repeat offenders and criminals.

Congress, for its part, should codify these changes to prevent any potential future open borders President from unilaterally undoing them. It may also need to create mechanisms for a parent covered by the EO to be able to renounce their child's American citizenship as an exercise of their parental rights, especially in cases of truly accidental births on U.S. soil.

States too have a role to play in limiting perverse incentives. For example, they can require parents who are here illegally to pay for the public schooling of their children, whether U.S. citizen or not (and thereby prompt the court to revisit the wrongly decided Plyler v. Doe decision of 1982).

People are furious because the biggest court rewrite of the Constitution since Obergefell has placed our national identity at the mercy of foreigners making decisions according to THEIR interests, on THEIR timing, and on THEIR terms.

In the American system of government, for every egregious SCOTUS decision, there should be an equal and opposite reaction from the other federal branches, the states, and the People. It’s how our system is designed, and we should exercise that power to make sure it is Americans, and only Americans, who decide who can join our great nation.

[Zachary Werrell, Esq. @zkwerrell]

Yes, John Roberts and Amy Coney Barrett, it is just “revisionism” to claim that the understanding of the 14th Amendment’s use of “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” meant something other than; as you put it, “the power of the United States to govern those within its territory.”

So I guess Thomas J Cooley, namesake of Michigan’s School of Law, when writing his textbook “Principles of Constitutional Law” in 1880 and as revised in this 1891 edition, was engaged in revisionist history?

He was announcing a made up, revisionist understanding of the 14th Amendment, and not capturing the public or even legal understanding of that phrase?

M’kay.

[Liz Wheeler @Liz_Wheeler]

President Trump should end all immigration in the name of national security.

He has the authority to do it without Congress.

Per the Immigration and Nationality Act:

“Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.”

Section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) (8 U.S.C. § 1182(f)):

[Peter Schweizer @peterschweizer]

Justice Gorsuch makes an important distinction: the Fourteenth Amendment protects those who have made America their permanent home — not those here only temporarily to secure citizenship for a child.