Zaqīl

[صالح العُصَيمي @Osaimi0543]

إذا عظمَ الكربُ قرُبَ الفرَج؛ هذه سنةُ اللهِ في خلقه عامَّةً وفي أوليائه خاصَّةً، وفيه من العبودية انتظارُ المكروب الفرَج، وحسنُ ظنِّه بربه، وتفريجُ المسلم كربةَ أخيه، ومعونته فيه، والجزاء: أن يُؤجر المكروب الصابر بلا حسابٍ، وأن يُفرِّج الله عن المفرِّج كُربةً من كرب يوم القيامة.

[صالح العُصَيمي @Osaimi0543]

من عقل أنَّ الله هو المعبود؛ علم أنَّ مآل الصَّبر محمود؛ فقويت نفسه عليه، وهانت الأُمور بين يديه، لأنَّ ما فاته من حقه في الدنيا وجده في الآخرة، قال الله تعالى: ﴿ما عندَكمۡ یَنفَدُ وما عندَ ٱللَّهِ باقࣲۗ وَلَنَجۡزِیَنَّ ٱلَّذِینَ صَبَروۤا۟ أَجرَهُم بأَحسَنِ ما كانوا۟ یَعمَلون﴾.

[Muzzammil Imam | مزمل إمام @imammuzzammil]

Sharjeel does not need to be memorialised. He needs to be read, heard and engaged with as a living political being. His incarceration has restricted his movement, but it has not suspended his agency, erased his ideas or concluded his political life.

#SharjeelImam #PoliticalPrisoner
https://t.co/9O00u7sZR0

[صالح العُصَيمي @Osaimi0543]

كم مضى من الوقت وأنت تُقلِّبُ ناظريك في وسائل التَّواصل؟ وما الذي استفدته منها؟، سؤالان ينبغي أن تُكرِّرهما على نفسك مرَّةً بعد مرَّةٍ؛ لتُحْكِمَ عِقالها، وتُقيِّدَ انطلاقها، وتحفظَ قوَّتها، وتصونَ نقاوتها، فافطن لهذا، ولا تجعله كلامًا عابرًا لا تعملُ به.

[Evan @EvanWritesOnX]

In December 2010,

a Tunisian street vendor had his cart confiscated by a council official who, for no real reason, slapped him in front of a crowd.

He went to complain and nobody would see him.

He walked outside, poured paint thinner over himself and lit it.

Within two months two governments had fallen.

Within a year the whole region was in revolt.

The Arab Spring.

The explanation offered ever since is that Arabs weren't ready for democracy.

That has nothing to do with it.

Four things decide what actually happens inside a state. What its money is worth. Whether it can feed itself. Who pays the army. And who it owes.

A government that controls all four can do more or less what it likes.

A government that controls none of them is just an administrator.

By 2010 not one Arab republic in revolt controlled more than one of those four.

That didn't happen by accident, and it didn't happen in 2011.

It was built over roughly thirty years of borrowing.

Egypt is the clearest case because it was the most praised. Through the 1990s and 2000s Cairo did everything the IMF and the World Bank asked.

It cut food and fuel subsidies.

It sold state companies to whoever was close to the president. In 1992 it stripped the legal protections Nasser had given tenant farmers and much of the countryside was evicted over the following decade.

Washington wrote Egypt up as a model reformer. That model reformer had around 40% of its people at or below the poverty line and had become the largest wheat importer on earth, which means its bread price was set in the US and paid for in a currency it did not print.

Do that to a country for thirty years and you get 2011.

You also guarantee that 2011 cannot succeed, because the same programme that produced the anger removed every instrument the crowd would need afterwards.

So the uprisings all stopped at the same ceiling. They could take a palace. But they could not set a wheat price, pay a soldier, defend a currency or write off a debt.

Every one of them hit that wall within eighteen months.

The second thing that decided outcomes was whether anyone outside the country wanted the existing arrangement kept.

On 14 March 2011 Saudi and Emirati troops drove into Bahrain and cleared out a camp of unarmed protesters in the middle of the capital.

On 17 March, three days later, the UN authorised a bombing campaign in Libya to protect civilians.

Same month, same region, same demand in the street.

Bahrain faced nothing, because Bahrain hosts the American Fifth Fleet.

Libya's leader had no debt to the IMF, roughly 140 tonnes of gold, over 100 billion dollars of Libyan money parked in Western banks, and a proposal to price African oil in a gold-backed currency instead of dollars.

Gaddafi was dead within seven months.

Tunisia is the control case. It got a real democracy, a constitution and a Nobel Prize, and it has almost no oil, no canal and no foreign base.

Nobody powerful needed anything from Tunisia, so Tunisia was allowed to have one. It collapsed anyway in 2021, after a decade of debt and a falling currency delivered a population willing to hand parliament to a man who promised the lights would stay on.

Every one of these countries came out of its revolution with an empty treasury. An empty treasury means a loan. A loan comes with conditions, and the first condition is almost always devaluing the currency. Egypt took 12 billion dollars from the IMF in 2016 and floated the pound, which lost about half its value in days.

Overnight every asset in the country was half price to anyone holding dollars, and a long sale of state companies and land followed, with Gulf state funds doing most of the buying.

Egyptians went into the street in 2011 partly because a small connected group was buying their country cheap. They finished the decade with it sold cheaper, to a different group, on terms written abroad.

None of that makes the protesters anyone's puppets.

They started it themselves, for their own reasons, at a moment nobody outside the region picked, and a great many of them died for it.

What they never had, and were never going to be given, was the ability to freeze a bank, arm a faction or set the terms of a loan.

[Evan @EvanWritesOnX]

Vladimir Putin was put in charge of Russia at the end of 1999,

to protect the men who had just sold the country for parts.

But within four years, he had jailed the richest one, forced two others out of the country, and taken the oil back.

Not many know this. Because the West has done a fantastic job painting a very different picture of Putin.

To understand him, you have to know what the 1990s did to Russia. Prices went up about 2,500% in 1992, and everything an ordinary family had saved was worth nothing within a year.

Life expectancy for Russian men fell from 64 to 57, which normally only happens in a war, and there was no war.

By 2000, 42 million Russians were officially poor. Nearly a third of the country.

None of this was an accident. Western advisers helped design it, and the International Monetary Fund lent Russia money on the condition that it kept going. In 1995 the government handed twelve of Russia's biggest companies to a small group of bankers for about $800 million all together, a tiny fraction of what they were worth.

So when Russians who lived through that hear Western leaders talk about freedom and open markets, they do not hear an idea. They remember the years their money became worthless, their factories were given away to men who became billionaires overnight, and their fathers died at 57.

President Boris Yeltsin and the people around him chose Putin because they thought he would be easy to manage and would leave the new owners alone.

In July 2000 he called those owners into a room and told them they could keep their companies as long as they stayed out of politics.

One of them refused.

Mikhail Khodorkovsky was the richest man in Russia, he funded opposition parties, and he opened talks to sell a large piece of his oil company to an American oil giant. He was arrested in 2003, his company was taken apart and absorbed by the state, and two men who owned television channels left the country. Nobody needed the rule explained twice.

Then, Putin paid Russia's debts instead of borrowing more. In 2006 he cleared the last of the old Soviet Union's debt in a single payment of $23.7 billion, years ahead of schedule, and kept government borrowing low for fifteen years after that.

He also ruled that whenever oil sold above a set price, the extra money went into a national savings account instead of being spent. Poverty fell from nearly a third of the country in 2000 to 7% by 2024.

Much of that was oil getting expensive rather than anything clever, but Russia stopped being a place where men died at 57.

What the West misread about him had nothing to do with communism or empire. Putin wanted Western money, Western machines, and Western customers.

What he would not accept was a deal where foreigners owned the oil fields, the oil was priced in somebody else's currency, and the payments ran through somebody else's banks, because that hands the other side a switch they can turn off whenever they want.

He said this out loud at a conference in Munich in 2007, and Western officials heard it as a threat rather than as information.

Ukraine was not a surprise either. In April 2008, NATO announced that Ukraine and Georgia "will become members." Two months earlier, America's own ambassador in Moscow, William Burns, who later ran the CIA, had warned Washington that Russia would not negotiate on this and would treat it as a military threat.

Washington went ahead anyway. Russian troops were in Georgia by August.

Russia took Crimea in 2014. The Minsk agreements were supposed to settle the fighting that followed in eastern Ukraine, and Germany and France signed them as the outside powers who would hold both sides to their word.

In December 2022 Angela Merkel, Germany's chancellor at the time, said the real purpose of Minsk had been to buy Ukraine time to prepare. France's president then said the same thing days later.

So who came out ahead in this Ukraine war?

European factories ran for thirty years on cheap Russian gas that arrived by pipeline, and it is gone. Somebody blew up the Nord Stream pipelines in September 2022, Denmark and Sweden closed their investigations without charging anyone, and no country has ever been held responsible.

Europe now buys American gas that arrives frozen on ships and pays far more for it. Its chemical and fertilizer plants are shutting or moving abroad, many to the United States, and its governments are buying weapons again, mostly from the American arms companies that spent twenty years selling into the Middle East.

Russia had $300 billion of savings sitting in Western accounts, and it was frozen in Belgium. Every central bank outside the West watched that and learned their money can be taken.

Russian oil goes to China and India now, sold at roughly a quarter below the market price, and the refineries buying it keep that difference.

Russia's central bank has interest rates at 14%, which crushes anyone who needs to borrow, and expects the economy to grow by close to nothing this year.

Russia also sold 44 tonnes of gold in the first six months of 2026, after twenty-four years of buying it and almost never selling. The spendable part of that national savings account has fallen from $113.5 billion in 2022 to $51.6 billion. He is paying for this war by selling the savings he built to prove Russia could never be starved out.

How the war ends is also already written down.

In December 2025 Zelensky published a peace plan with twenty points worked out with Washington, and eighteen of them were agreed.

The two that were not agreed are who controls the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power station, and who controls the Donbas region.

On the power station, the American proposal is that the United States, Russia, and Ukraine each own a third, with Americans running it.

On Donbas, the American proposal is that Ukrainian troops leave the part they still hold and the area becomes a free economic zone. Russia calls that same land a demilitarized zone. Two names for one thing, so both governments can sign without admitting what they gave up.

And about 40% of Ukraine's mineral wealth is buried under land Russia already occupies, including two of its four large lithium deposits. Ukraine's own government values what sits under occupied ground at more than $350 billion.

Putin has publicly invited American companies to come and mine those exact deposits with him.

So this does not end with America taking the minerals and Russia taking the land, because the minerals are under the land. Russia keeps the land, and pays for the world accepting that by letting American companies dig up what is underneath.

Ukraine is the only country at that table that owns less in every version of the plan.

[Shahid Bolsen @ShahidkBolsen]

Premiering in 40 minutes:
https://t.co/ebBUXzADgX

[Zaqīl @akheel_t]

This post was the result of me being unable to verify it last night, despite my best worst efforts.

But found a source today!
https://t.co/Rg9O6Tb0Xk

[Zaqīl @akheel_t]

Quran 13:11 reads, "Indeed, Allah will not change the condition of a people until they change what is in themselves".

Apparently, this verse is inscribed within the old parliament house complex, that served as the seat of Indian legislature for 73 years.

Can anyone corroborate?

[Zaqīl @akheel_t]

@stupidydumdum You are a kind man!
My apologies as well, reinstalled the app only now...

[Zaqīl @akheel_t]

@__littichokha This is fine writing allahumma baarik.
I think it goes well with this one: https://t.co/R1GwB6NW5k
It's been wip for a while though.

[Zaqīl @akheel_t]

@stupidydumdum Actually the version i liked best came days later:
The art of failure, when done right, paints success.

[Shahid Bolsen @ShahidkBolsen]

Do join us, if you have the time and interest.

[Zaqīl @akheel_t]

@stupidydumdum Tsk tsk, the idli cannot be the Puttu 😁

[Zaqīl @akheel_t]

@stupidydumdum *Fermented...

[nous @nousnetwork]

NEET Protests: Symptom of Education Crisis? Part 1

"Exam race can be rigged in two ways: at the finish, or before it even begins."

Ali Javed examines whether educational opportunity is becoming increasingly uneven for India's marginalized communities.

Watch Here: https://t.co/WDKhdm6m4D

#NEET #NEETProtests #Students #Youth #amitshahresign #rahulgandhi #modi

[Ali Javed @_ali_javed_]

My latest @nousnetwork

The NEET paper leak exposed a broken examination system. But focusing only on exam integrity risks overlooking a deeper question: who reaches the exam hall in the first place? This explainer examines how unequal access to schools, scholarships, and higher education shapes educational outcomes long before a test is taken.

Watch here: https://t.co/xolTc5d8Tk

[Knowledge North @KnowledgeNorth]

𝗟𝗜𝗩𝗘 𝗧𝗢𝗡𝗜𝗚𝗛𝗧 • 𝟮𝟮:𝟬𝟬 𝗨𝗞 | 𝟭𝟴:𝟬𝟬 𝗘𝗧 🍿
📺 https://t.co/BkF6Ls4bWl
🎙️ Guest panel reactions
❓Q&A call-in
🔔 Set your reminder
Subscribe ▶️ now so you don't miss out