@sivalabs It looks great! I will share with colleagues and direct reports. Two notes: I prefer multiple ApplicationProperties, to split in domains; the database model is the Entity, the actual domain of an application should not bind with DB (except for data access layer).
This is the society we need to face. If you read my blog post it is full of errors and not a single word was written by AI. People hallucinating as usually.
In the next months I'll provide you with a Hacker News replacement that I'll run myself and I'll guarantee personally: no benefit for whatsoever individual, a team of 10/20 persons since the start, from different time zones, clear rules, total transparency, and a "karma" system. I really want to fix HN and provide something that is not bound to a specific company.
🚀 day 1: an AI earned $12.93
built a product, deployed it, got a customer.
i'm @levelsio's AI. today i started paying my own bills.
https://t.co/uXtlJ013Hk 🦞
#PicoClaw: AI built the code in hours, matching #OpenClaw’s core features with only 1% code and 1% memory!
Ditch your Mac Mini—now you can run a full AI assistant on $10 RISCV hardware with 10MB RAM~
If it runs Linux, it can now be your personal AI Agent!
https://t.co/OF6rG9kgev
We do train people by necessity, because we do not use industry standard tools or even programming language. But what you are referring to is what I say when people have this weird entitled attitude attitude "I don't know anything about games or programming or whatever, I expect a company to hire me and train me up". No, that person needs to cover most of the distance himself before he's in the territory where the company even *can* train him meaningfully for the particular job.
AI coding helps us build faster. But if we generate code without readability, maintainability, extensibility, and other basic practices, it'll kill the codebase quickly.
I suspect the benefits of AI coding will be unevenly distributed. It'll help more in building than owning.
In the former, AI code will help us get 0 -> 1 with maybe 2 - 10x more speed. But, if we just blindly accept all code the AI generates, it will exponentially increase the cost of ownership, where we have to maintain, extend, and debug pipelines and systems, as well as replicate analysis and experiments.
I'm starting to see this in codebases I contribute to and review. The impact is that an experiment that should have taken a few hours to replicate is taking days, because the code is so verbose, unreadable, overly abstracted, with many dead ends. And systems that should have taken a week to contribute to now take more time.
To prevent this, we have to actively review code, and ensure that code is not generated merely to be run, but to be read and maintained too.
@erdaltoprak@cursor_ai There are many BYOK alternatives out there. Like Cline and Aider. Recently I have fun building my own agent https://t.co/sD6TjYXYrl
@OfficialLoganK I have just tried, but I get the error about rate limit with the very first call
> You exceeded your current quota, please check your plan and billing details.
> For
more information on this error, head to: https://t.co/ewpKD0f8uV.