@realhzakaria As long as the lebanese army is under strict restrictions for the benefit of israel, yes we can still blame israel (and the US).
And just out of curiosity, why was israel in lebanon in 97 ?
@knaffeminist Et alors ? Faudrait savoir, il y a un amalgame entre les juifs de france et les crimes de guerre du gouvernement israelien ou pas ? Ou c'est à la carte ?
@sfrantzman Nice sentiments, but tell me, why is the lebanese army under US embargo ? Why is the US actively preventing the lebanese army arming properly to be able to defend the country and do its job ?
@SollySollinger@VerminusM Lol i'm not sure what you're trying to say, israel itself refuses to define its own borders. That was the point i was making.
@VerminusM Not that they were right, but they attacked occupying military positions in occupied territory, not israel.
Facts matter.
Why is israel still occupying territories outside its borders ?
@ianai_pe@HamburgerAdrian@IsraelVive1948 I don't support hezbollah. You don't understand anything i said. It's sad.
Israel is a bigger threat to lebanon than hezbollah. You think saying "terrorist" multiple times somehow makes your argument better ? It doesn't.
@HamburgerAdrian@ianai_pe@IsraelVive1948 I wonder: why is the US putting severe restrictions on the lebanese army, and preventing it from being able to defend the country?
@HamburgerAdrian@ianai_pe@IsraelVive1948 Israel invaded lebanon many times before hezbollah even existed. It's only armed resistance that kicked them out in 2000.
For hezbollah to be disarmes, am essential condition is that the army is able to defend the country and deter further aggressions.