@katiehobbs Hey Katie, 1)PROVE TO US YOU ACTUALLY WON
2) explain what Conflict of Interest is.
3) explain how by your calling the race for YOURSELF is NOT conflict of interest
3) why did it take a week for you to declare yourself a winner?
4) why did you cower from one single debate?
@WHO DO NOT LISTEN TO THIS IRRESPONSIBLE RHETORIC from #KlausSchwab look him up! Check out his agenda!
They want us all killed! Don’t trust me, do some research. WHO, klaus Schwab, communism, propaganda. Then try to defend @WHO@ProfKlausSchwab@ELCPod
Quit being brainwashed!
@WHO DO NOT LISTEN TO THIS IRRESPONSIBLE RHETORIC from #KlausSchwab look him up! Check out his agenda!
They want us all killed! Don’t trust me, do some research. WHO, klaus Schwab, communism, propaganda. Then try to defend @WHO@ProfKlausSchwab@ELCPod
Quit being brainwashed!
The #TwitterFiles revealed that activist employees Blacklisted my account and thousands other users for our Political Views.
Join me on a Twitter Space with @JackPosobiec, @RepMattGaetz, @bennyjohnson, @ALX & more to discuss
Tune in Tonight at 9pm ET
https://t.co/qdVPGPohbD
27. A few minutes later, Twitter employees on the “scaled enforcement team” suggest that Trump’s tweet may have violated Twitter’s Glorification of Violence policy—if you interpreted the phrase “American Patriots” to refer to the rioters.
26. Less than 90 minutes after Twitter employees had determined that Trump’s tweets were not in violation of Twitter policy, Vijaya Gadde—Twitter’s Head of Legal, Policy, and Trust—asked whether it could, in fact, be “coded incitement to further violence.”
"... and places the responsibility for that power on their own shoulders… So they hide behind an ever-changing rulebook, alternately pointing to it when it’s convenient and shoving it under the nearest rug when it isn’t.”
https://t.co/JmafTeURoV
“Facebook’s suspension of Trump now puts Twitter in an awkward position. If Trump does indeed return to Twitter, the pressure on Twitter will ramp up to find a pretext on which to ban him as well.”
Indeed. And as @bariweiss will show tomorrow, that’s exactly what happened.
/END
5. “Our mission is to provide a forum that enables people to be informed and to engage their leaders directly,” the company wrote in 2019. Twitter’s aim was to “protect the public’s right to hear from their leaders and to hold them to account.”
https://t.co/rtQjkQQxSs
4. For years, Twitter had resisted calls both internal and external to ban Trump on the grounds that blocking a world leader from the platform or removing their controversial tweets would hide important information that people should be able to see and debate.