12-18 yr its a socitety problem
18-23 yr its my understanding problem
23-27 yr its my fit in the system problem
27-35 yr its peopleware problem
35-49 yr its finanancial and political problem
49-xx yr its the problem that anything happening in this world, happens for money
Everyone speaks about the market that should resolve to YES on @Polymarket today
Strategy sold 32 BTC between May 26 and May 31
8-K filed June 1, timestamps the sale as "of May 31, 4PM ET"
inside the window. first sale since 2022.
and @Polymarket is about to resolve the market as NO because the disclosure hit one day after the deadline.
let's be real about what this is
> $253M in volume on just the May 31 market
> 19,843 YES holders at 0.4¢ right now
> two NO proposals already disputed by the community
> a trader publicly disclosed buying 49,695 YES shares for $35K USDC after reading on-chain activity
> Polymarket added the clarification "confirmation outside the timeframe doesn't count" AFTER the dispute started
paying out the YES holders costs a few million. it's not nothing, but it will be recovered in no time.
most of the winners will put it back into the platform within weeks.
But resolving NO by quietly retrofitting the rules at the last minute costs the one thing prediction markets actually need: TRUST.
> community walks
> traders take the case to court (already happening)
> every future market gets read by lawyers, not gamblers
> UMA's token voting model gets exposed even harder than the WSJ already did
the sale happened. Strategy's own filing says it did.
the only argument for NO is "we didn't know yet" which is the exact opposite of how event based contracts have always resolved.
@Polymarket built something real here.
losing it over retroactive rule interpretation is the kind of mistake you don't come back from.
13 hours to final review. do the right thing.
resolve YES. the next 1000 markets are watching
im not sure if UniGet UI is providing me any value.
in the last 3 years, i've installed 0 software from uniget.
maybe because just a couple of times, i havent found the software i was looking for and it installs in weird locations with noncustomizable settings?
The wallets short on the "MicroStrategy sells any Bitcoin" pool would owe more than polymarket's entire $82M Q2 revenue if it resolves to YES
This is why they also happen to be the UMA voters
Decentralized they say
The downfall of polymarket.
The team resolved the “microstrategy sells any Bitcoin by May 31” market to No.
The problem is they literally sold Bitcoin in May.
It’s not even up for debate. The filing says they sold Bitcoin. That’s a fact.
If a tree fell in the forest on May 31st, but someone didn't discover it until June 1st, then Polymarket would resolve that the tree fell on June 1st
If users can’t trust markets to be resolved based on what actually happened, the whole product falls apart.
Pretty hard to justify using a prediction market when objective facts apparently don’t matter.
This is basically free advertising Hip4 hyperliquid
Hyperliquid is just superior
im still mad that some person deicided network manager is better in any way(than network-scripts). it solves nothing, and solves even less(than zero) in the server space.
this WILL unroll, but when?
weird incentive, but it makes sense for white collar workers to inflate the price/cost of AI, so their salary makes sense, yet they obv see it as their replacement.
is AVX512 actually useful(compared to ancient AVX2)?
support is still spotty, it affects turbo freqs, and even in the best case what is the raw BW benefit?