Malaysia dibina oleh cita, kudrat dan kekuatan rakyatnya yang rencam kaum dan budaya.
Justeru, melalui inisiatif dan ikhtiar yang terbentang, saya mahu terus mendengar dan menggarap harapan anak muda, pengorbanan oleh sekalian ibu bapa, warga emas serta suara rakyat mendambakan masa depan yang jauh lebih baik
Jadi, saya amat berharap bahawa kalian boleh kongsikan pandangan, kebimbangan, dan aspirasi secara terus melalui avatar ini kerana saya yakin negara hanya akan bertambah baik sekiranya ia berpaksi pada suara dan kehendak rakyat.
Saya mengajak semua untuk ikut serta dalam kempen ini dan mula mencipta wacana yang segar untuk negara dan rakyat.
https://t.co/J96Tqk6E4I
#PMXAI
#MalaysiaMADANI
#YakinMADANI
F-104's role in low level nuke run is my favorite litmus test to see if an "aviation nerd" actually has good insights in technical use cases or simply harps whatever other people say lol
what? sanctions? llm weights? trade restrictions? permanent underclass?
the only class you should care about is this beautiful 2010 S-Class that can be yours for just 24k euros on autoscout24
@ElDuderinoGG@RayleeRaven574@AUTOMATON_ENG that last part is the hard part that makes it tricky for a study sim. you may wanna put features the jetmaker might object to, and you must signal the authorities that data is derived from public and not proprietary. same reason why DCS Eurofighter is a mishmash of Tranches
@ElDuderinoGG@RayleeRaven574@AUTOMATON_ENG depends, anything can happen behind doors.
for the latter it goes both ways, its usually not wise for module makers to work with jetmakers beyond brand bc then they would be bound to policy. they stick to public domain data so jetmaker has no say to what can or cannot be done
@ElDuderinoGG@RayleeRaven574@AUTOMATON_ENG what is it u dont understand lol
PA talks to jetmakers. often they get the privilege to see things. no ones worried bc PA is not trying to replicate
Sim makers must thread a thin line between replication, export control and jetmaker policy. That privilege would be a liability
@ElDuderinoGG@RayleeRaven574@AUTOMATON_ENG DCS/WT and all those study-sim actively avoid these kind contact bc they needed legal clarity that none of their data was derived from proprietary or potentially export-restricted sources.
@ElDuderinoGG@RayleeRaven574@AUTOMATON_ENG i think you are absolutely overthinking about it here lol. some manufacturers would gladly show them the actual interface/employment/tactical systems, doesnt mean PA has to implement or can depict it in the game. no different than Tom Cruise coached to play with rhinos all day
@ElDuderinoGG@RayleeRaven574@AUTOMATON_ENG Ace Combat even back on the PS2 had faithful recreations of models down to how the bleed vents work, also depiction of novel tech (Scinfaxi sublaunched UCAV, CCA, COFFIN cockpit etc) which didnt came out from nowhere, it was the industry showing them whats on shelf
@ElDuderinoGG@RayleeRaven574@AUTOMATON_ENG im saying PA definitely has *access* to more data, except thats not their goal. for an arcade game, visual
accuracy and novel systems concept they could use for bosses/lore. manufacturers like collab with them vs WT/DCS bc the final product isnt going to tip off sensitive info