I'm working on an extremely fast GitHub pull request review UI.
AI has made code production so much nicer, but reviewing code in GitHub's UI has remained painfully slow (especially for large diffs).
It's completely free, soon to be open-source, and all requests come from your client -- no server holds your GitHub credentials.
https://t.co/a7otwuqyEQ
Let me know if/when you find bugs 🐛
Oh wow, an xterm.js-compatible libghostty-powered terminal for the browser via a zero dep 400KB wasm blob. Looks like early work is focusing on compatible, but curious what performance looks like given we haven't tried to optimize that at all for wasm. https://t.co/8t71DQrI51
@ArghZero The “most secure” would be only permitting traffic to the LLM API hosts. Not sure there’s a good default here for your project though. Applications are highly diverse in their networking needs.
@sqs@coderhq I see the critical issues not as reviews per se but slow reviews. Your proposal could be generalized to reviews that wait more than N hours default to a mergey disposition. N can be controlled by time of week, seniority of submitter, etc. When N is zero no review is necessary. 🤷♂️
@sqs@coderhq Responded in haste and misunderstood your point… Trust based review requests, at least for the experienced/senior members is interesting. Not sure why we haven’t tried it other than following the crowd 🤔
Coder is now maintaining the nhooyr/websocket library, continuing its focus on performance, and stability. We're grateful for nhooyr’s trust and honored to serve the #Go community. Contributions in the form of issues and PRs are welcome. Learn more here: https://t.co/SfFB5zDzqz
Congrats to @rwhiteley0, @ioammar, @kylecarbs & the @coderhq team on securing a $35M round! 🚀 We are thrilled to support Coder’s mission to boost developer efficiency.
More on why we’re excited about Coder’s future 👇
https://t.co/8Kw6mcaq1l
cc @glennsolomon@YungerOren