@Sandwich_Smith@Triceratops235@alittleleader No.
No.
Most trial lawyers like trials, but that has little to do with what’s best for the client and isn’t a relevant consideration in talking with a client about evaluating a plea offer.
@Sandwich_Smith@Triceratops235@alittleleader What’s the “disparity” you think exists here? Trial lawyers enjoy trials. The system would be better if people weren’t punished for exercising their right to trial. That doesn’t mean that having a trial in a given case will get that client a better outcome in the system we have.
THREAD. A few years ago, we were worried about the hidden epidemic of prosecutor misconduct. Why do so many prosecutors break the law? Why does nothing happen to them? Why does it stay secret? So, we tried to do something. What we found was more shocking than we imagined.
Federal prosecutor Jennifer Kerkhoff Muyskens is facing disciplinary charges for allegedly using deceptively edited videos as evidence in criminal cases against people arrested while protesting the 2017 inauguration of President Trump.
Subscribe: https://t.co/AwGcupQwnY
@GoYardGoats Is there a schedule of activities available somewhere? Trying to plan for some Lego loving kids who may not have the stamina to sit through a whole game.
@WMATASoldier@councilofdc I’ll volunteer to chair it for 10 straight hours over zoom while 90 community witnesses each give 3 minute speeches about their opinions on performance oversight, and then I get to ask Brooke Pinto any question I want and she has to answer it.
Hey @councilofdc, when can we expect the 2024 Performance Oversight Responses to be put online? It's been months since the hearings concluded, and last year most of them were available in March.
https://t.co/J6pPtBOulr
Is it “oppositional defiant disorder” or is it “we can’t figure out how to help this kid so we’re going to label him with a diagnosis that makes that his fault.”
New: DC courts keep tossing out MPD gun cases due to unconstitutional searches. Rather than adapting, cops seem to be doubling down.
I took a look at why these tactics, as exemplified by notorious “jump out” searches, are ineffective as well as illegal. Link in thread…
Bruen used to be a dumb test that created predictable results.
Now, after Rahimi, I don't think I could predict the outcome of any second amendment case, because I have no idea which old concerns will be analogous to modern laws.
Why not just use normal tiers of scrutiny?