Impressive performance indeed by @HansMokeNiemann! Wonder if he’ll be the next to land on a 2800 rating? Or @anishgiri? Or @MagnusCarlsen (why put restrictions on directionality)? Or one of the Indian kids?
🇺🇸 Hans Niemann on his match against 🇷🇺 Ian Nepomniachtchi:
"I think after playing Nepo, who is low-rated by his standards right now, we should not forget that he almost became World Champion. He's a two-time Candidates winner, two-time challenger, and has won many tournaments.
Showing this level is a great sign. I definitely think I left a lot on the table, especially in the white games.
This was not an easy match. This was not someone that you could expect to farm.
I definitely think he's underrated. It was a great challenge, and being challenged in this way was a great learning experience."
@anishgiri “Anish worked hard when Gukesh was doing his victory laps and shooting his ads. But got so distracted by thoughts of what he’ll post on X after beating the world champ that he missed Ng4! Inability to stay calm & maintain concentration & intensity was the biggest differentiator.”
Yup, after years of folding, FIDE finally has a world champion who outperformed Carlsen at the Olympiad top board, and finally call Carlsen's bluff. Not bad PR too, since Carlsen wasn't going to be able to defend his World Rapid title, and now this just comes across as a tantrum.
@atwell_rose@1000GMorg Nice! You seem to have good visualization skills reading a chess book without a board. Hope you do well and keep improving and break into the Olympiad team in 2026 and help the team improve on this year’s bronze.
@mustreader *in such events* yes, great idea because of the drama it brings. But in all of chess no, Gukesh-WeiYi Budapest’24 being the biggest argument against no increment. Chess will be poorer and it’d be blasphemy against Caïssa if such endgame performances cease to exist.
@chessninja@TarjeiJS Couldn’t agree more. The chess world would be a poorer place without endgame masterpieces like Gukesh-WeiYi Budapest ‘24. And there’d be no such masterpieces without increment unless time controls are drastically altered to impractical levels.
@FabianoCaruana thinks @DGukesh has a 30% chance against @MagnusCarlsen in a classical match. Which means he rates Carlsen's chances to at least hold Gukesh to a 6-6 draw much higher than 70%? Wonder how he'd rate chances for himself, @anishgiri, @lachesisq, etc against Carlsen?
@ryanmendis76@phoenix669056@GMJacobAagaard@Bennyficial1 Chess needs @MagnusCarlsen in these tumultuous times though, and so I hope he finds the motivation for classical. Gukesh could go past Magnus on the classical rating list, but hard to see him standing up to Vishy and @FIDE_chess when it comes to ethics around Russia, for example.
As @GMJacobAagaard recently mentioned to @Bennyficial1, Carlsen's last classical tournament win was Wijk '22. And Gukesh has been winning everything he sets out to win, including the Candidates and finishing ahead of Carlsen at the Budapest #ChessOlympiad.
https://t.co/bL1HpMbULB
@phoenix669056@GMJacobAagaard@Bennyficial1 So as the representative of planet earth against a hypothetical alien in a classical match without the possibility of speed chess being used for TB, I’d ignore the 35 Elo difference and pick Gukesh ahead of Magnus today. If speed chess is involved then Magnus still best.