Argument is that founders get taken advantage of bc bankers + buy side (hedge funds, other money managers) are repeat players with a tacit agreement to underprice IPOs. Sell-side (investment banks) are incentivized to do this bc their repeat customer (buy side) will do business with them again for the next IPO. So although banks are meant to serve the interests of the company, their actions reveal that they are really just serving buyside interests
You are correct about the CEO’s authority but, respectfully, the analogy doesn’t work — corporate authority (contractual and narrow) differs from political authority
Legality and legitimacy are not the same thing. Revoking property rights may well be “legal” but it breaks the social contract that underpins legitimate governance
@bryan_johnson would love a green drink to replace AG1 and supplement vegetable intake. Avoiding longevity mix due to creatine and potential hair loss. I’ll stick with AG1 until you release a cheaper, just as delicious, alternative