p

[Flopping Aces @FloppingAces]

Zohran Mamdani looked at America’s 250th birthday and apparently saw a crime scene.

Not a nation that broke from monarchy, abolished slavery, defeated fascism, stared down Soviet communism, built the most prosperous society in human history, welcomed generations of immigrants, expanded civil rights, and gave ordinary people a chance to rise.

Nope.

He saw bondage. Squalor. Nativism. Oligarchs. Hungry children. Trillionaires. “Masked agents.” “Unmarked vans.” Persecuted migrants. Evil landlords. Shadowy “powerful” people with the wrong skin preferences and sinister accents.

That is the Victim/Oppressor Factory in action.

Every person gets sorted. Every institution gets charged. Every success gets reclassified as exploitation. Every border is cruelty. Every law is persecution. Every wealthy person is a suspect. Every grievance is evidence. Every American achievement is inadmissible.

And the best part? The people running this ideological assembly line call everyone else “divisive.”

Mamdani didn’t give a birthday speech. He walked through 250 years of American history like a detective planting yellow evidence markers around the country, then announced that the defendant was guilty before the trial even started.

That is the scam of permanent grievance politics: America can never improve enough because improvement would ruin the business model. There must always be fresh victims, fresh oppressors, fresh charges, fresh guilt.

America turns 250, and these people still need it kneeling in the interrogation room.

At some point, stop calling that patriotism.

It is an ideology that needs America guilty forever.
(article below)

[p @ancientphilip]

@ErikVoorhees @reddit_lies @mimirk

[p @ancientphilip]

@HedgeDirty @jbraknes @mimirk

[Erik Voorhees @ErikVoorhees]

If the socialists had their way, Elon would have had his paypal profits taken and redistributed for the greater good.

The world would never have seen Tesla, nor SpaceX.

And the world wouldn't know it, because they were uncreated, and thus unseen.

Imagine the companies that don't exist, because Washington destroyed them before they were born.

[Erik Voorhees @ErikVoorhees]

No, you don't get it.

He does not have $1 trillion sitting in cash, it is 99% stock in his companies.

To make that wealth liquid would mean selling all that stock which would swiftly destroy *both* the companies (Tesla, SpaceX, others) and the wealth. If he sold it all, he'd end up with maybe $100b max, several hundred thousand people would be out of work, the companies ruined and many of their suppliers also ruined.

Okay, but now Elon has $100b in cash, and can "solve the world's problems".

$100b divided by the world's 8 billion people is $12

If you were in charge, several of the most innovative industrial companies in the world would be destroyed, hundreds of thousands out of work, and space would again close to human civilization for another generation.

But everyone on earth could have one nice meal and you could revel in your altruism.

[Kevin Bass @kevinnbass]

Whites are the LEAST racist group in the world.

So why is the LEAST racist group called the MOST racist?

The best explanation I can come up with is that the racist groups are calling whites racist, for racist reasons.

It's a weapon.

They know whites care about being fair and impartial above all else.

So they hit whites as hard as they can with the "racist card" to make whites doubt whether they are living up to their own standard.

It's racist, predatory gaslighting.

And it's inflicted relentlessly against whites on a mass scale.

Whites, we are the LEAST racist group.

When they call you racist, understand that that's actually THEM.

They're being racist toward you by calling you racist.

You are not racist. They are.

Don't put up with their racist bullshit.

[p @ancientphilip]

@vegardwikeby @jbraknes Fordi det ikke handler om pengene, de ønsker å «jevne ut forskjellene»

Vi bor i et kommunistisk land vettu

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

Something is deeply wrong

[p @ancientphilip]

@LiteralTwatler @GadSaad Gaad criticizes suicidal empathy everywhere, his post wasn’t saying it’s better in the US or Canada you fucking moron.

[Olav Haraldseid @OHaraldseid]

Kun en tidobling av formueskatten på hytter – ja du leste riktig.

Først eiendomsskatt på hus og hytter som bare øker og øker hvert år. Så på toppen: en tidobling av formueskatten på de samme eiendommene. Det er ikke lenger nok å ta litt mer – det skal tas mye mer. Hvert år. Fra næringslivet og fra vanlige folk med jobb, bolig og kanskje en hytte.

Dette er et mønster. Regjeringen har kronisk behov for mer penger til å finansiere verdens største offentlig sektor som vokser raskere enn både verdiskapning og produktivitet. Regnskapet går ikke opp.

Mens bedriftene sliter med skyhøye energikostnader velger man å svare med høyere formuesskatt, høyere utbytteskatt, høyere arbeidsgiveravgift, lakseskatt, grunnrente, hotellskatt, exit skatt og en rekke nye avgifter. Kapital og kompetanse flagger ut mens flyktninger flagges inn.

Samtidig kastes mange av milliardene fra skattebetalerne ut på ideologiske prestigeprosjekter som skal «redde verden»: Elektrifisering av norsk sokkel til en samlet prislapp på ca. 120 milliarder – bare for å eksportere det samme CO2 utslippene til kjøperne av gassen iandre land. Havvindmøller og batterifabrikker som aldri ble lønnsomt. U-hjelp uten krav til dokumentert effekt. Innvandrings- og integreringspolitikk som har kostet og vil koste flere hundre milliarder fremover. Nytt regjeringskvartal til en pris som ligger over byggingen av Burji Kalifa og sist, men ikke minst alle pengene til velmenende tenketanker....

Vi må altså betale for at regjeringen skal kunne sløse på prosjekter som verken gir velferd, vekst eller reell klimanytte. Fredsnasjonen Norge skal redde verden symbolsk – på bekostning av sine egne innbyggere. Det er middelklassen og den øvre middelklassen samt noen få rike som blir igjen og plukker opp regningen.

[Teddy - PolyBackTest.com @Bitcoin_Teddy]

Prepare for the most jaw-dropping 4 minutes and 21 seconds you will watch this year.

Nicole Shanahan — ex-wife of Google co-founder Sergey Brin, former running mate of RFK Jr., and a woman who personally signed nine-figure philanthropy checks — went full whistleblower on the entire Silicon Valley “tech wife mafia” and how they were used.

Her exact words:
“I don’t think many of the tech mafia wives realize… they were used to set the groundwork for what Klaus Schwab calls The Great Reset. Their money especially was being conscripted through a network of NGO advisors, Hollywood, Davos, and their own companies. A really small group of people… completely blind to how their groundwork is being used to enable these Great Reset policies.”

Then she turns the knife inward:
“These women find their meaning through philanthropic work. I really believed I was helping Black communities and indigenous communities rise up. But now the problems have gotten worse. Crime worse. Mental health worse. The whole model is broken. At the end of the day they always go: ‘But climate change.’ Social justice + climate change — it gets progressive women 100% of the time.”

She even says many now believe the biggest “climate change issues” are actually geoengineering issues.

This isn’t some random podcast bro.

This is a woman who lived in the mansions, sat on the boards, flew private to Davos parties… and is now saying:
“We were the useful idiots.”

[Tim Soret @timsoret]

As a European, I apologize to Americans for all the idiocy coming from our side.

You save your pilots no matter the cost.
You send humans to the moon.
You fight authoritarianism head-on.
It's truly inspiring.

We're on the wrong side of the moral equation.

[p @ancientphilip]

@ytrevenstrenett https://t.co/ln6X3yn8iv

[Eric Daugherty @EricLDaugh]

🚨 ARGENTINA PRESIDENT JAVIER MILEI says it absolutely PERFECTLY

"I thought being on the left was a mental problem...what I discovered is that being on the left is a DISEASE of the SOUL."

"The left is built on envy, hatred, resentment, unequal treatment before the law. They are very violent."

"And since they have no way or arguments to answer, they go for physical violence."

"Lefties always resort to physical violence and all kinds of violent manifestations because they are unable to refute the arguments!" 🇺🇸🇦🇷

[BruceUnfiltered @BruceUnfiltered]

Konstantin Kisin used an apple analogy to explain concerns around illegal immigration and border control in simple terms. The argument focuses on how governments handle unlawful entry, public consent, national borders and immigration enforcement. The debate links to wider questions about asylum policy, migration pressure and state authority in the UK and Europe.

[Wall Street Apes @WallStreetApes]

This is very eye opening

Medical Doctor Clay Moss “Come with me so I can show you what the cafeteria looks like at a well-respected hospital”

Really think about this. Something is obviously very wrong

And it’s not just the cafeteria, he points out so many things that don’t make sense

[Ncole ✡︎ @ncole_r]

Every major lie about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict debunked in 2 minutes:

Another amazing job from Shabbos Kestenbaum.

[Sue Knows Best @sues86453]

Why happened to Tucker Carlson?

There can only be one or two answers. Either he’s completely brainwashed and lost his way or he’s taking money from the opposition to spew nonsense. Smh

[Camus @newstart_2024]

Helen Andrews nails a provocative truth: We're entering uncharted territory in human history—no civilization has ever faced a future where women dominate key institutions like the judiciary, legislatures, police leadership, and the legal profession.

Veterinary medicine is already ~80% female in U.S. vet schools—and Andrews says that's probably fine; nothing about "feminine modes" (consensus, conformity) clashes with healing animals.

But universities? Businesses? Courts? She argues we must judge case by case against the institution's core purpose:

- A university needs prickly, disagreeable eccentrics who challenge consensus. Heavy feminization + HR dominance could suffocate that.

- Some businesses thrive with collaborative, relationship-focused styles; others grind to a halt under excessive "HR-ification."

- The real issue: Legal and cultural "thumbs on the scale" that empower HR departments to override masculine-coded traits (risk-taking, directness, tolerance for disagreement) across every large institution.

Andrews' bottom line: Let natural variation thrive. Some fields suit feminine strengths perfectly; others need masculine ones. Forcing uniform feminization via policy isn't progress—it's distortion.

Clip from this 3:36 deep dive—fresh thinking on gender shifts that actually matters.

Does this "case-by-case" lens make sense to you, or do you see feminization as net positive (or negative) across the board? Which institutions do you think are most at risk—or most improved—by the shift?

Your take—let's hear it.

[Don Keith @RealDonKeith]

Hilarious and scary at the same time to imagine that these guys will be running the world a couple decades from now.

[Garry Kasparov @Kasparov63]

Believe them.