int x; std::cout << x;
In C++23, this is undefined behaviour. The compiler can do anything: crash, format your drive, summon nasal demons
In C++26, this just works. Recompile. That's it 🧵👇
“Before patching a local issue, first look for a way to simplify the codebase and make it more consistent, so the fix fits the existing code structure without hacks, duplication, or special cases.”
Microsoft: PowerShell is simple and easy to use.
Actual PowerShell command: Remove-MgIdentityAuthenticationEventFlowAsOnGraphAPretributeCollectionExternalUserSelfServiceSignUpAttributeIdentityUserFlowAttributeByRef
No, this isn't a joke. This was noted by @NathanMcNulty
Microsoft: PowerShell is simple and easy to use.
Actual PowerShell command: Remove-MgIdentityAuthenticationEventFlowAsOnGraphAPretributeCollectionExternalUserSelfServiceSignUpAttributeIdentityUserFlowAttributeByRef
No, this isn't a joke. This was noted by @NathanMcNulty
AIs aren’t good rule followers. The older the rule in the context window, the less priority it is given. So the best way to enforce the rules is with external tools that communicate failure to the AI. Acceptance testers, Linters, dependency checkers, C.R.A.P. analysis. Mutation testing. Etc.
Productivity gains come from disengagement from the code. Let the AI worry about the code. You worry about everything else, including the code quality metrics.
I don’t review code written by agents. I measure things like test coverage, dependency structure, cyclomatic complexity, module sizes, mutation testing, etc.
Much can be inferred about the quality of the code from those metrics. The code itself I leave to the AI.
Humans are slow at code. To get productivity we humans need to disengage from code and manage from a higher level.
He was in a bad humor. Мне было сегодня лет, когда я узнал что Humor может значить "настроение". И происходит это из латинского "жидкость" и теории 4 главных жидкостей в теле человека.
In the 1970s, the Soviet Union constructed an exceptionally powerful radar…
It literally rattled American radio stations thousands of kilometers away! This is the infamous Duga Radar, nicknamed the “Russian Woodpecker” for the eerie click-click-click it broadcast across global frequencies. Built to detect U.S.-launched nuclear missiles, Duga was enormous—150 meters tall and 500 meters wide—larger than a small city block. Its technology could spot a basketball-sized object from 40,000 kilometers away.
The unsettling part? Whenever Duga was active, radios worldwide picked up its strange tapping, confusing and frustrating listeners, with some even speculating it was an alien signal. Then in 1986, the Chernobyl disaster cut its power, silencing the radar. Today, only its skeletal frame remains in the Exclusion Zone, a ghost of a machine that once made the world tremble with its relentless tapping.