@MelissaMilena90 @tkaiser_science Agree, I don’t think providing reminders on a schedule people think they want is that much tailoring, more like letting you buy the size pants you usually wear. But good to see a null finding anyway
@joarhalvorsen Can you say what your concern with this is more specifically? I think five is definitely stretching the meaning of “primary,” but what harm are you worried about here? Just that researchers should make stronger hypotheses?
@MiriForbes Unsurprisingly Cattell did a bunch of this in the 60s and 70s. His dR-tech FA is just factor analyzing change scores, but he had some other ideas too. My dissertation covered similar ground. One paper using multilevel EFA for this was published: https://t.co/d5MiPkKLoF
@tkaiser_science Got it, I think: If you have a preference, there is a moderate chance that you would remit in the preferred but NOT remit in the non-preferred treatment, and that is especially true for CBT?
What is the chance you would remit in the non-preferred but not the preferred?
@tkaiser_science Checking my understanding: if you prefer a treatment, the preferred treatment will have a somewhat higher chance of leading to remission? For CBT a bit more than LTPP?
I haven’t personally figured out how to use mastodon yet, but there’s a new profile pic of me there, which I think is responsible for a major upsurge in people moving over there