Jack Angstreich

[Jack Angstreich @angstreich2]

@stefanietwits @Maxim_Alxndr If I had to choose one, maybe CHINATOWN, but there are a few I really love.

[Jack Angstreich @angstreich2]

@stefanietwits :)

[Jack Angstreich @angstreich2]

@stefanietwits I don’t think so.

[Jack Angstreich @angstreich2]

@stefanietwits I love Philippe Garrel

[Jack Angstreich @angstreich2]

@stefanietwits Not yet

[Jack Angstreich @angstreich2]

@stefanietwits I thought it was interesting - I’d like to see it again now

[Jack Angstreich @angstreich2]

@stefanietwits Yes

[Jack Angstreich @angstreich2]

@stefanietwits Hard to choose

[Jack Angstreich @angstreich2]

@stefanietwits @mikemovies The Searchers

[Jack Angstreich @angstreich2]

@stefanietwits @NonsenseIsland @Maxim_Alxndr Fantastic

[Jack Angstreich @angstreich2]

@IABIBFY @adorientem Tomaszewski is a dodging thug.

[Jack Angstreich @angstreich2]

@matthewwalther @_attlee Is it that you don’t have a credible answer to Attlee’s question?

[Jack Angstreich @angstreich2]

@adorientem @RealisticNilist @Dr_M_Robillard The view in question is non-Fregean semantic externalism—is that what you’re rejecting, dumbass?

[Jack Angstreich @angstreich2]

@adorientem @RealisticNilist @Dr_M_Robillard It follows that on this view, an agent can be mistaken about the meaning of his own concepts. Now if he can be mistaken about this, how can those concepts compose the contents of the intentional states that rationalize actions, dumbass?

[Jack Angstreich @angstreich2]

@adorientem @RealisticNilist @Dr_M_Robillard You’re such a stupid bigot that you don’t understand that on non-Fregean semantic externalism, meanings are not mediated by the agent’s beliefs—that is what it is for meaning to exhaustively consist in denotation.

[Jack Angstreich @angstreich2]

@adorientem @RealisticNilist @Dr_M_Robillard Now that you’ve been corrected, we’ll soon see if you’re honest enough to admit your mistake. It’s also noteworthy that you’re not calling Robillard out for his inveterate dodging.

[Jack Angstreich @angstreich2]

@adorientem @RealisticNilist @Dr_M_Robillard If meanings of concepts can’t be opaque to their possessors, this means that speakers can’t be mistaken about what their terms mean, dumbass.