Former BC Min. of Post-Sec. Ed. retracts Feb. '24 apology for describing Palestine as "a crappy piece of land w/ nothing on it." At the time, she said her decision to leave cabinet "does not excuse my harmful comments, nor does it absolve me of the work I am committed to doing."
Even a few lefties are mocking the comically bizarre academic idpol on display at Socialism 2026, the annual gathering of Haymarket Books and the ISO (which disbanded in order to infiltrate the DSA). A pantheon of Haymarket authors and ISO fellow travelers signed the now-notorious recent open letter denouncing international solidarity with Iran against the US-Israeli war as a form of "hollow anti-imperialism."
The international panels at Socialism 2026 kept the crypto-neocon spirit of that Iran letter alive. One panel featuring supporters of the CIA-run Ukraine proxy war was titled, "Russian Neofascism: Imperialism Abroad & Repression At Home." Another consisted of obscure academic figures who have pushed regime change in Russia, pre-Delcy Venezuela, China and Iran. These countries were portrayed in Socialism 2026 publicity material as "imperialist."
As The Grayzone reported in 2019, that year's "Socialism" conference featured a panel on China filled with anti-communist academics funded by the US government's National Endowment for Democracy. Another panel drummed up regime change in Nicaragua and Cuba. The Syrian government was also a consistent target of Haymarket/ISO, at least until a rebranded Al Qaeda outfit took power in Damascus.
If this is American socialism, capitalism has little to worry about.
Removing every shred of support from the genocidal apartheid state of Israel and, in turn, from anyone who supports the Israeli state is NOT a "purity test" or "making the perfect the enemy of the good."
There's no acceptable position other than unambiguously fighting to end this holocaust and the horrific occupation.
At a bare minimum, this means that elected officials claiming to be pro-Palestinian must not endorse Zionist politicians funding this holocaust.
It's an objective fact that most of the DSA-endorsed leaders fail to meet even this basic standard. History will not absolve them for this any more than those silent during the Nazi Holocaust. Those of us fighting against the horrors in Gaza and the West Bank cannot look the other way out of some false idea of "left unity."
@EnglerYves Donāt forget Rebick wants to make space for Marsha Lederman and her āprogressive Zionistā feelings. With all those feelings, and Gloriaās ghost, itās no wonder she has no room for you.
A former CIA asset who promoted the destruction of Libya & genocidal anti-Palestinian propaganda is okay, but the leading critic of Canadian foreign policy should be cancelled. The reaction of a segment of the Canadian left to Gloria Steinemās death highlights a glaring imperialist, anti-Palestinian, double standard.
In her twenties Steinemās political work was funded by the CIA. In 2011 she aggressively hyped (dubious) sexual abuse claims used to justify NATOās destruction of Libya and two months into the holocaust in Gaza she was lead signatory of a letter promoting Israelās October 7 mass rape hoax. Fittingly, Steinem was a staunch supporter of aggressive imperialist Hillary Clinton, even smearing young women for supporting Bernie Sanders over Clinton in the 2016 Democratic primaries. Steinheim was photographed with Madeleine Albright, who infamously said killing a half a million Iraqi children was āworth itā, and received a presidential award from the murderous Barrack Obama.
Considering her alignment with liberal imperialism and Zionism, itās unsurprising Steinheim was lauded on the front of Fridayās Globe and Mail, Wall Street Journal and New York Times (āIndefatigable feminist leader became symbol of the modern movementā, āGloria Steinem, Feminist Trailblazer, Dies at 92ā and āHer Voice, Pen and Vigor Lifted Countless Womenā). Knowing the broad outlines of her liberal imperialism and Zionism, Matthew Behrens, Judy Rebick and a slew of other Canadian leftists have also lauded Steinem in recent days. For them her enabling of genocide and liberal imperialism is less important than her role advancing North American feminism. Political gains arenāt linear and individuals have complicated trajectories so there is a case to be made for celebrating Steinem from that standpoint. Iām not sympathetic to that argument, but at least it has some logic.
But when you contrast that argument to how these individuals relate to genuine leftists it exposes stark imperialist, genocidal, power serving, double standards. At a decisive moment, Rebick and Behrens cheer led attacks against me that enabled the reactionary NDP brass to exclude a dynamic anti-imperialist and anti-capitalist campaign from the partyās leadership race.
Among many attacks that aligned with efforts to suppress an activist campaign, Rebick and Behrens repeatedly labelled me āantisemiticā. In a https://t.co/LF1QGB5nCM discussion about the NDP leadership race Rebick suddenly attacked a campaign promoting an anti-capitalist and anti-colonial platform crafted by 45 activists and researchers. She complained, āYves Englerās people are trying to take over the chat which is annoying me no end. So just like cool it guys. You just convince us that itās good heās not on the platform by trying to take over the chat.ā The unelected three person NDP vetting committee was justified in excluding an insurgent leftist campaign because some supporters posted in a chat!
When asked about my exclusion from the race, Rebick claimed, āYves Engler is the most destructive person Iāve ever known on the left. Ok Iām saying that. The only time Iāve ever seen him in political practice is in disrupting a meeting or harassing a politician.ā
For Rebick, Behrens and many other Canadian self-described socialists a CIA asset who supported the destruction of Libya and enabled the genocide in Gaza is okay. But a genuine internationalist and anti-imperialist campaign deserved to be shut down for āantisemitismā, Rwanda genocide denial, pro-Putinism, āharassmentā or whatever other claim the mainstream media, NDP brass and its left backers made against a leadership candidate who was not their chosen one. Their double standards are obvious.
Gandhi is taught in Western schools for a reason.
Not because nonviolent resistance is the only thing that works. Because it is the only thing the system is comfortable including in its curriculum.
Teach Gandhi.
Don't teach the Mau Mau. Don't teach the FLN. Don't teach the Viį»t Minh.
Don't teach the conditions that made those movements inevitable, the specific brutalities that nonviolent petition had already failed to address for decades before people concluded that petitioning had a ceiling.
The lesson they want you to take from Gandhi is: change comes from asking politely with great moral dignity.
The lesson they don't want you to take from the full history is: the British left India because the empire was no longer sustainable, economically or militarily, after the Second World War, and the independence movements across the empire made continued colonial control more expensive than it was worth.
Gandhi mattered. Gandhi was extraordinary.
He was also operating within a specific set of historical conditions that made nonviolent resistance viable in ways it is not always viable.
The system teaches you the tactic without the conditions.
So you apply the tactic in conditions where it was never going to be enough.
And then it tells you that you failed because you didn't have Gandhi's moral purity.
You want to know what actual free speech looks like in the American context?
Edward Snowden told the truth about what the government was doing to its own citizens.
He is in exile.
Chelsea Manning told the truth about what the military was doing in Iraq, including footage of a helicopter crew killing journalists and laughing.
She was imprisoned.
Julian Assange published documents showing the gap between what Western governments said and what they did.
He spent years in an embassy and then a prison, and the country that lectures the world about press freedom led the effort to destroy him.
Meanwhile the people who lied about weapons of mass destruction and launched a war that killed hundreds of thousands:
They are on the speaking circuit.
They are on television as analysts.
They have libraries named after them.
This is not a paradox. This is the system working correctly.
Free speech, in the empire's operating definition, means you can say anything that doesn't threaten the machine.
The moment the speech has real consequences for real power:
You discover exactly how free it is.
If Anthony Housefatherās car was set ablaze, would it be linked to Palestine and antisemitism? Why is confirmed and probable Zionist violence treated differently? Should we also be pointing a figure at those inciting it?
In the middle of the night Wednesday Liberal MP Salma Zaid had her car set ablaze. Video shows a man pouring gasoline on five cars in her Scarborough driveway. He succeeds in burning two of them and runs off when the gas container catches fire. Reportedly, cars were also set ablaze near the MPās house in 2024.
The prime minister and leader of the main opposition parties, as well as multiple Muslim organizations, expressed their solidarity with Zaid. Conspicuously, the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs, B'nai Brith and Friends of Simon Wiesenthal Center have stayed mum on the (probably) hate motivated arson. Ditto for Zaidās ultraāJewish supremacist Liberal colleague Anthony Housefather. In fact, I couldnāt find any comment on the matter from a mainstream Jewish Zionist organization.
An arson at the home of Canadaās first veiled MP, who has been the partyās most vocal critic of Israelās genocide and apartheid, follows on the heels of an assault by a Jewish Zionist at a Palestine rally in Montreal. As I reported, Robert Moisecu shoved a camera into a photographerās face, screamed slurs and uttered death threats against an Arab during a pro-Palestinian rally on Monday. More information has emerged about the scope of the former Israeli soldierās criminal background. As late as last year Moisecu was caught robbing a restaurant and in 2015 he killed a British tourist in Tel Aviv with a fatal dose of fentanyl.
In a violent, racist, Substack post boasting about his actions Monday Moisecu admits, āYes.. I was a terrible human being. I killed.. robbed.. assaulted.. used narcotics.. smoked.. fucked and drank my way through life.. everyone has their idiosyncrasies. Believe it or not.. I have changed.ā
In āāBadā Jews like me... won't stay silentā Moisecu utters multiple threats and concludes, āWe are at war. we are active combatants whether you know it or not. Trotsky once said, āYou may not be interested in war, but war may be interested in you.ā Arm the fuck up.ā
At the bottom of a commentary noting āI may as well use my innate predisposition to kinetic conflict resolution in the defense of western civilizationā, Moisecu includes two posts with my name marked prominently and another with a photo of Toronto journalist Samira Mohyeddin.
Moisecu followed up his Substack rant with another post explicitly threatening to attack the next pro-Palestinian demonstration in Montreal.
(After popular outrage online, the Montreal police announced that their hate crimes unit was investigating his actions at the Monday rally. They havenāt, however, arrested Moisecu despite his threats. In contrast, the Montreal police jailed me for five days in a failed bid to impose onerous conditions regarding a charge they ultimately dropped.)
Local Jewish organizations, fighting in IOF, family living in illegal Israeli settlement, etc. likely radicalized Moisecu. More specifically, three days before the Montreal city council vote, former Conservative party candidate Neil Oberman released a video calling on Zionists to āgo down there ⦠[to show] we reject your impairment, we reject your sickness.ā Montrealās leading Zionist lawfare activist angrily added ātake back our city, take back our province, take back our country, take back your dignity.ā
Did Obermanās word influence Moisecu?
Similarly, was the person responsible for the arson at Zaidās home influenced by the violent rhetoric coming from the newly created Jewish Defence Force? The former head of the fascistic Jewish Defence League, Meir Weinstein, recently set up a Toronto organization named after the genocidal Israeli Defence Force.
Israel supportersā response about the arson at a Liberal MPās house and Robert Moisecuās attack is deafening in its silence.
CBC News should have allocated more than 22 seconds of coverage. At the very least, reference the PM's statement. This is a serious incident directed towards a sitting MP and it should be treated as such.
Sorry to burst the bubble of every šµšøšŗš¦ account on this app, but comparing Palestine's genocide & apartheid in the hands of western imperialism TO a literal western-backed project propped up by the very same interests that fund Israel is insanely disgusting.
Shame on all of you.
Blatant assault with a weapon against a young man in #Vancouver, BC, on 23 August 2026 at around 5:45PM. The young man was attacked unprovoked by a cyclist for wearing a hat with an Iran flag patch. The assailant then attacks the young man with what looks like a bicycle lock three times and rides off.
If you recognize him or can identify this man, please reach out through DMs or message the tip line on Signal: kriticalkanadian.99
When @PierrePoilievre, @FrankCaputoKTN and @specurran talk about supporting the āperzhianā community, theyāre talking about terrorists like the cyclist. They support the murderers and thieves of the Pahlavi Cult.
Liberal Zionists are far more dangerous than Smotrich and Ben Gvir. In fact, the only thing allowing Smotrich and Ben Gvir to exist is Liberal Zionism.
Thereās a white Jewish man whoās managed to wedge himself into pro-Palestine spaces, building a personal brand off of genocide. And every time I vaguely mention him, without even naming him, someone new messages me with another horrifying story.
NSSM-200. National Security Study Memorandum 200. 1974. Written under Henry Kissinger.
Classified until 1989.
Its subject: world population growth and its implications for American national security.
Its argument: population growth in the developing world, specifically in thirteen countries identified by name, including Nigeria, Brazil, India, Indonesia, Mexico, represented a strategic threat to the United States.
Not because overpopulation causes humanitarian crisis.
Because large, young populations in resource-rich countries create political pressure for those countries to control their own resources.
The memo was explicit: if developing countries develop politically conscious, resource-nationalist governments responding to their own populations' needs, they will demand control of their oil, their minerals, their agricultural land.
And that control would come at the expense of American access.
The solution proposed was population control programs, funded through USAID and international organizations, targeting those specific countries.
Not as humanitarian aid.
As strategic intervention to reduce the political pressure that large populations place on governments to actually serve their people.
This document exists. It is declassified. You can read it.
And then you can look at fifty years of American-funded population programs in the Global South with the full knowledge of what the architects said, privately, in 1974, about what those programs were actually for.
The aid was real.
The stated purpose was false.
The document says so.
After lobbying for war on her former country, @AlinejadMasih got ICE to kidnap a couple of professors and their son, even though they committed no crime
Why does US media still refer to this monster as a "human rights activist"?