If emergence was invented by the ancient Greeks they would also have spammed that shit. "Oh yeah we totally understand lightning, it's an emergent property, nothing to see here". Saying "emergent" has about as much explanatory power as just saying "it happens sometimes"
Trump: "Elon I didn't see you back there. What are you doing so far back there?"
Elon: "I think it's worth highlighting the positive benefits of AI—SI, pardon me."
Trump: "Thank you." *slaps arm*
Most entertaining President of all time. 😭
Instinct CEO Noah Shinn says agents will let restaurants give tables to birthdays and anniversaries over whoever clicks first
"And traditionally, because of the way that the internet has worked, at least for reservations, it's been first come first serve. So anyone that comes in, no matter how important or how not important it might be, whoever gets in first gets the reservation."
"But what if you had the ability for the agent to be able to communicate on both sides, communicate, hey, this is important. This is actually the person's spouse's birthday, the 30th birthday, a very special event is coming up."
"And the restaurant too can say, let's actually prioritize birthdays or major decade birthdays or major anniversaries or these certain people, I don't know, whatever it might be, right?"
"So now with the ability, with all of the logistical burden of having to describe exactly what your case is and what's happening and why it's important. Now we have the ability to perfectly match what does the restaurant want? What does the user want?"
"And that will result in more special events for the users being able to actually have a spot in the restaurant."
🚨 BREAKING: TRUMP REJECTS UN AI TREATY, OFFICIALLY BANS THE TERM “ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE”
"The United States totally rejects any attempt to construct a globalist schemeto control artificial intelligence."
"The word 'artificial' makes it sound fake. It is not fake... It’s actually amazing..."
"From this point forward, all United States documents will use the term: SUPER INTELLIGENCE"
"Whoever wins Super Intelligence, wins."
This film was goated, and people who don't like it because of "character assassination" are media illiterate. He was also a weak, insane, and childish character in Joker. He happened to stumble into a revolution but he was never a mastermind, and could never have been "the Joker"
my hot consciousness take is that humans also think in neuralese, qualia are vectors, continuity of consciousness is a form of KV caching, and subjectivity is a product of the residual stream.
@maximelabonne@huggingface There's something to be said about the fact that even frontier LLM based models are absolutely abysmal at chess. In this clip it's blundering pieces in one move, and it's the same model that can do maths and programming like it's nothing.
@Rohanburdened You'd say "when" not "if". So "if when you see something funny, you laugh, then you laugh often. And we know you do laugh when you see something funny, so you must laugh often"
“Two boxes, folks. TWO. Kamala takes one. Leaves a thousand dollars on the table. Unbelievable. And Omega says he saw it coming. Saw everything coming apperently. Everything! Except me taking both boxes. I call him NO-mega. Nothing mega about him"
@FUNKePills It's unironically the best strategy for falling asleep. The only problem is that I don't play overwatch that much any longer which makes it harder.
@QiaochuYuan Science fiction only works because science is real. It's fantasy but in our own universe. Many things will happen which sound like the genre of *cool things happening which are not forbidden by the laws of physics*
Blaming yourself for a loss is the most narcissistic thing you can do
“I should’ve rotated”
“I should’ve kept farming”
“I could’ve killed there”
You’re NOT the main character
Grow up, be mature, and start blaming your teammates
@tracewoodgrains The tweet he replied to says "its like saying taxonomy is a human construct SO there are no species". He then replies "taxonomy is a human construct". He completely missed the point of the tweet he replied to. Both people agree on the first point but not on the implication.