„… flew blood supplies to Greenland and planned to blow up runways.
Key sources in Denmark and Europe are now revealing for the first time what happened during the most critical days, when Donald Trump threatened to take Greenland “the hard way.”“
Denmark prepared for a possible U.S. attack: Flew blood supplies to Greenland and planned to blow up runways
Key sources in Denmark and Europe are now revealing for the first time what happened during the most critical days, when Donald Trump threatened to take Greenland “the hard way.”
When Danish soldiers were rapidly deployed to Greenland in January this year, they brought explosives with them. The plan was to destroy runways in Nuuk and Kangerlussuaq to prevent American military aircraft from landing troops on the island, should the U.S. president ultimately decide to seize Greenland by force.
They also transported blood supplies from Danish blood banks so wounded personnel could be treated in case of combat.
This is reported by DR, which over the past year has spoken with central sources in the Danish government, top military officers, and high-ranking officials and intelligence sources in Denmark, France, and Germany.
All sources have played—and continue to play—key roles in the international crisis triggered by the United States’ demand for control over Greenland.
Together, the sources describe an unprecedented year marked by sleepless nights. None of them had concrete intelligence of specific American attack plans against Greenland. Still, many feared in January that the historically important ally, the United States, could attack at any moment.
At the same time, Denmark reached out to its European allies, leading to closer cooperation.
“With the Greenland crisis, Europe realized once and for all that we must be able to handle our own security,” said a French senior official involved in the intense period.
A rapid-response force consisting of Danish, French, German, Norwegian, and Swedish soldiers was first deployed to Nuuk and Kangerlussuaq.
Shortly after, a main force followed, including:
-Soldiers from the Danish Dragoon Regiment in Holstebro
-Elite troops from the Jaeger Corps
-French alpine troops trained for cold and mountainous warfare
At the same time, Danish fighter jets and a French naval vessel were sent to the North Atlantic.
According to several sources, the goal of having multinational troops on the ground was to ensure that any U.S. attempt to take Greenland would require a large-scale hostile action—thereby deterring such an attempt.
“We have not been in such a situation since April 1940,” said a Danish defense source, referring to the days before Denmark’s occupation during World War II.
Unlike in 1940, when Denmark chose not to resist militarily, the government and defense leadership this time decided—after extensive confidential discussions—to take the opposite approach:
If the U.S. attempted an attack, Danish forces would be armed and ready to fight. Danish F-35 fighter jets deployed north were also fully armed.
All this despite the understanding that Denmark could not realistically withstand a U.S. military attack.
“The cost for the U.S. had to be raised. The U.S. would have to carry out a hostile act to take Greenland,” said a senior Danish defense source.
Source: DR
„there is no doubt that Al Sharif was a staunch Hamas supporter who celebrated massacres against Israelis, and who has personal ties to Hamas.
(…) Supporting Hamas and glorifying terror is not the same as being a commander in a Hamas brigade.“
13: In conclusion, there is no doubt that Al Sharif was a staunch Hamas supporter who celebrated massacres against Israelis, and who has personal ties to Hamas.
As for Israel’s accusations that he was a commander in a Hamas brigade; I will do my best to see if I can either verify or dismiss those claims by looking at the evidence they’ve provided. I hope all serious journalists will do the same. Supporting Hamas and glorifying terror is not the same as being a commander in a Hamas brigade. But it is definitely proof that he didn’t live up the to most basic standards for journalism, and that his work was mostly Hamas propaganda.
I’m yet to see any work he’s done that criticizes the countless war crimes Hamas commits on a daily basis. I also haven’t seen him covering any of the anti-Hamas demonstrations in Gaza, something a journalist with integrity surely would do. If he did, please let me send me a link.
Gute Einordnung von @krisenfrey dazu, dass das Recht auf Selbstverteidigung Grenzen hat, die Israel immer weniger beachtet, das moralische Fiasko, das zum Trauma des 7. 10. hinzukommt und Israel ebenso gefährdet wie der Vernichtungswille seiner Feinde https://t.co/vCc1hayA1Y
Warum tut sich die ÖVP in den Städten so schwer? Und wie kommen die Konservativen da wieder raus? Analyse mit Kollegin @annagiuliafink
https://t.co/QAZPN8CPZ2
NEW: The actions of Trump and Vance in recent weeks highlight something under-appreciated.
The American right is now ideologically closer to countries like Russia, Turkey and in some senses China, than to the rest of the west (even the conservative west).
For anyone wondering why Trump refuses to criticise Putin, while hectoring Zelenskyy, here's my piece on the US president's 1987 trip to Moscow. Trump's visit was arranged by the ... KGB. Extract comes from my #1 New York Times bestselling book 'Collusion' https://t.co/E3BylCFbQf
🎙️ Neu im oiip-Podcast:
Neutralität – Hemmschuh oder Chance für eine aktive Außenpolitik? 🇦🇹
Eine Aufzeichnung der Veranstaltung vom 11. Dezember – jetzt reinhören!
@cengizkhan@RalphJanik@annagiuliafink
https://t.co/uDjNLjcWV2
Wer mich beim Abratenten über unseren Umgang mit der Neutralität oder @annagiuliafink und Thomas Mayr-Harting beim kluge Sachen-Sagen hören will: hier geht’s lang 👇🏻
Herzliche Einladung zur 3. Episode unserer Serie "Österreichische Außenpolitik neu" zum Thema: Neutralität: Hemmschuh oder Chance für eine aktive Außenpolitik
Es diskutieren @RalphJanik, @annagiuliafink,
Thomas Mayr-Harting
Moderation: @cengizkhan
👉https://t.co/PDq936Z8Ud
Herzliche Einladung zur 3. Episode unserer Serie "Österreichische Außenpolitik neu" zum Thema:
Neutralität: Hemmschuh oder Chance für eine aktive Außenpolitik
Es diskutieren: @RalphJanik, @annagiuliafink, Thomas Mayr-Harting
Moderation: @cengizkhan
👉https://t.co/jgk9P9LCom
3) Der Westen verliert, wenn er die Augen nicht öffnet und zusammenhält.
Ich habe mit @annagiuliafink und @fasommavilla über Sabotage, Terror und Putins Krieg gegen Europa und die USA gesprochen.
Nicht verpassen:
https://t.co/k1cUxnL02V 2/2
Guterres lässt echt nichts aus. Zuerst freundlicher Handshake mit dem Kriegsverbrecher Putin, und dann herzliche Umarmung mit dem Diktator Lukaschenka.
Nicht das Hauptthema heute, I know, aber das hier ist eine sehr interessante Analyse über J. D. Vance des Republikaners (und Trump-Gegners) @davidfrum im @TheAtlantic
Vance is going home tonight with Walz's wallet. Vance didn't even have to snatch it, Walz just handed it over, along with a bunch of unearned compliments to Vance's fine character.