Please understand what happened here. Pregnant women were supposed to be excluded from the Pfizer trials โ because it is an experimental injection.
However 270 women who received the vaccine, got pregnant anyway. Then Pfizer is, per study regulations, supposed to follow all of these pregnancies to their conclusions โ live birth, stillbirth, miscarriage, or spontaneous abortion.
But for 238 women Pfizer didnโt do that โ Pfizer did not get the outcomes, or possibly they got them, and โlostโ the data. (Which in a digital era is impossible). Pfizer managed to follow, as they were required to do, only 32 women to the end of their pregnancies. Of those women โ
25 of 32 pregnancies ended in a miscarriage.
Two babies were born prematurely but then they died.
One woman suffered a spontaneous abortion and delivered a dead baby.
One woman had a baby born alive.
Again: One live birth out of 32 women, for sure.
Two unknown outcomes, difficult to understand because the outcomes are presented in indecipherable language.
Thatโs it.
If you had trusted the settled science of the day, here is how it would have gone.
1890s: you dose the baby with Bayer's new cough syrup, the non-addictive alternative to morphine, marketed for children. It was heroin. They named it after the German for heroic.
1900s: you rub calomel teething powder on your infant's gums. It is a mercury compound, and it leaves a generation with pink disease. Swollen, peeling hands and feet, screaming for months, and some of them died.
1910s: you cook in Crisco, launched by a soap and candle company, because cottonseed oil is modern and lard is what your mother used. The process that made it solid produced trans fat, banned outright a century later.
1920s: you drink Radithor, certified radioactive water, on prescription. Eben Byers took fourteen hundred bottles for his vitality. His jaw was removed in pieces and he was buried in a lead coffin.
1930s: a chemist dissolves a new sulfa drug in diethylene glycol, which is antifreeze. It kills 107 people, mostly children, and only then does America give the FDA power to demand safety testing.
1940s: your doctor lights a Camel in the surgery. More doctors smoke them than any other brand, and the advert runs in the Journal of the American Medical Association, which sold him the page.
1950s: DDT is sprayed over your kitchen, your garden and your children at school. The man who found its insecticidal properties has already been given a Nobel Prize.
1960s: your wife takes thalidomide for morning sickness because it is remarkably safe. More than ten thousand children are born with missing and shortened limbs.
1970s: the country puts down the butter and picks up the margarine, on the instruction of the American Heart Association. The fat everybody switched to was banned in 2015 as unsafe at any level.
1980s: the fat comes out of everything and sugar goes back in to make it edible. Obesity begins a climb it has never come off.
1990s: your father is prescribed OxyContin, because fewer than one per cent get addicted. The company later pleads guilty to criminal misbranding, and the overdose count runs into hundreds of thousands.
2000s: you take Vioxx for your knee. It is pulled in 2004, and the FDA's own safety officer estimates tens of thousands of excess heart attacks.
Not one of those was fringe. Every one had a professional body, a literature and a man in a white coat standing behind it.
Nobody who followed that advice was stupid. They were obedient, to the most qualified people available.
Settled is a word about money. It means the questions stopped being funded, so they stopped being asked.
So which of today's instructions will your grandchildren read out in disbelief.
The oil washed in hexane and built into every cell you own. The statin that blocks the pathway making your hormones, to prevent one heart attack per hundred people. The injection where a third of the loss is muscle. The infant formula built out of vegetable oil.
All settled. None of it funded to be otherwise.
Milton Friedman on 4 ways to spend money:
1) Your money on yourself (youโre careful about both cost and quality)
2) Your money on others (you care about cost, less about quality)
3) Someone elseโs money on yourself (you care about quality, not cost)
4) Someone elseโs money on others (you care about neither)
The last one is how government spending works.
@kwrob24@Wino_Winnie Gloating? Those of us who refused the jab were on the front lines of fighting tyranny. We warned you that Covid tyranny was a slippery slope and would lead to worse. Weโre not gloating; youโre just late to the fight.
@jeffreytucker The mills of the gods grind slowly, but ever so fine. I hope he spends his final years in a prison of despair and misery. Looks like heโs already there.
This is a crazy story about a photo that illustrates the depravity of Palestinism and captures the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians perfectly.
In 2008, Israeli superstar Idan Raichel, one of Israelโs most beloved artists, volunteered to perform for children from Gaza who had been brought to Israel by Save a Childโs Heart.
This organization saves children from all over the world, including Palestinians, and brings them to Israel for life-saving treatment.
After the show, Raichel took the time to pose for a photo with one of the children and his father, embracing a child Israel had given a second chance at life.
Years later, that photo resurfaced after it was found by the IDF in Gaza.
It turned out that the father was a Hamas operative, and the child Israel had saved, the one who was given a second chance at life, grew up to become a Hamas terrorist and was ultimately killed while fighting for Hamas.
Stories like this are why so many on the Israeli side believe the conflict is a lost cause. You can offer medicine, surgery, and compassion, but none of it matters if the next generation is raised to see murdering you as part of a generational campaign of revenge.
Fauci & co at the NIH knowingly โput out a killer drugโ during the HIV crisis. That drug was AZT which mimicked the progression of Aids so family members thought the disease was killing their loved ones when it was really the drug. Sound familiar? It should. The AZT of Covid was Remdesevir which also killed people while family members thought they were dying from Covid.