If you call yourself a communist or socialist, I assume you're too stupid to understand what you read (assuming you even can read).
Don't DM unless it's vital.
Capitalism is not a thing.
It was a concept created by Marx to 'other' the default human behavior of producing a surplus for trade. As a concept, it exists only as a pole against which communism can be triangulated. Before Capital, the concept didn't exist.
So why do we still refer to the default human behavior as an -ism? No one needs to read a book to do it, and one need not have a special belief system to understand it. It is not an -ism.
You laugh at this meme but little did you know that the Chinese once gave a Chinese dude dressed as a woman to a French official and he never caught on.
He even thought they had a child together (LOL).
During the 20 year affair, hundreds of classified French documents were extracted for Chinese intelligence.
It's a wild story.
In December 1964, Bernard Boursicot (20 yrs old) met Chinese opera singer Shi Pei Pu (26 yrs old) at a Beijing diplomatic party. Although Shi was a man, he told Boursicot that he was actually a biological woman forced to live as a boy to satisfy his father's desire for a son.
(Side note: this is NOT uncommon. My own mother was given a male name and raised as a boy because her grandparents wanted a son so badly. She only found out one day at school when she wet her pants and the teacher undressed her and found out she was in fact a girl. She was 9 yrs old.)
Shi was a trained Peking opera performer who regularly played female roles (dan). Because Boursicot had no prior sexual experience with women and their encounters happened in the dark, Shi sustained the illusion by retracting his testicles and manipulating his anatomy (I HAVE QUESTIONS).
To further entrench Boursicot and deepen his loyalty, Shi claimed to be pregnant and later presented a young Uyghur boy named Shi Dudu as their biological child. In reality, the boy had been "acquired" (kidnapped most likely) from China's Xinjiang province.
Chinese intelligence used Boursicot's devotion to his "wife" and "son" to pressure him into handing over more than 500 secret diplomatic documents from his postings in Beijing and Mongolia.
In 1982, Boursicot arranged for Shi and the boy to move to Paris. French counterintelligence grew suspicious, leading to their arrest in June 1983.
Boursicot only learned the truth during the investigation when court ordered French doctors examined Shi and confirmed he was biologically male. Devastated and humiliated, Boursicot attempted suicide in prison but survived.
MORAL OF THE STORY FOR ALTMAN et al:
🇨🇳 THEY USE TWINKS FOR HONEYPOTS TOO 🇨🇳
From: @JtotheAY
Delivered via: X direct message
11/11/26
To: Jackie Singh (@HackingButLegal)
Re: FORMAL CEASE AND DESIST: Defamation Per Se and Telecommunications Harassment Under Ohio Law. Demand for Retraction and Preservation of Evidence.
Ms. Singh,
This letter is formal notice that your public statements about me are false, defamatory per se, and actionable under Ohio law. I demand that you immediately retract them and stop all further publication.
The defamatory statement
On November 9, 2026, you published the following to nearly 100,000 followers on X, where it has been seen more than 54,000 times (https://t.co/nSaHFUyUNn):
«"Warning (serious): A bunch of domestic terrorists are operating under the hashtags "eggsalad" and "goldcorp""»
I am one of the people who post under those hashtags. Your statement accuses that identifiable group, and me as part of it, of being "domestic terrorists." Terrorism is a serious felony under Ohio law (R.C. 2909.24) and federal law (18 U.S.C. § 2331(5)). The accusation is false. I have never planned, supported, or taken part in any act of terrorism or violence.
Defamation per se under Ohio law
Under Ohio law, a statement is defamatory when it is a false statement of fact, published to a third party, made with the required degree of fault, that harms the subject's reputation. Falsely accusing someone of an indictable crime involving moral turpitude or infamous punishment is defamation per se. Damages are presumed, so I do not need to prove specific harm to recover.
Your statement is not protected opinion. You labeled it a "Warning (serious)," presented it as fact to warn the public, and offered no facts to back it up. A reasonable reader would take it as a factual claim that the people under those hashtags are terrorists.
You describe yourself as an investigative journalist and threat researcher. Making this accusation with no supporting evidence, to an audience that relies on you for exactly that kind of assessment, shows at least negligence and, I believe, reckless disregard for the truth.
Harassment
Publishing these statements and continuing to target the people associated with these hashtags may also be telecommunications harassment under R.C. 2917.21. Under R.C. 2307.60, anyone injured by a criminal act may bring a civil action for full compensatory damages, punitive damages where authorized, and court costs and attorney's fees. Repeated conduct that causes mental distress may also support a civil stalking protection order under R.C. 2903.214.
Demands
By [date, 7 days out], you must:
1. Permanently delete the post above and every other post, reply, quote-post, or publication, on X or elsewhere, that calls me or the people using these hashtags terrorists or criminals.
2. Publish a clear retraction on X, from the same account and with the same visibility, stating that your accusation was false.
3. Stop making any further false statements about me or the people targeted by your accusation, and stop all harassing conduct directed at us.
4. Confirm in writing that you have done all of the above.
Litigation hold
You are now on notice of a likely legal claim. You must preserve all evidence related to this matter, including posts, deleted posts, drafts, replies, direct messages, analytics, screenshots, and communications with any third party about me or these hashtags. Destroying or altering any of it after this notice may lead to sanctions and an adverse-inference finding in any later lawsuit.
Consequences of non-compliance
If you do not fully comply by the date above, I intend to pursue every civil remedy available under Ohio law without further notice. That includes a defamation action seeking presumed, compensatory, and punitive damages, a civil action under R.C. 2307.60, and injunctive relief.
Nothing in this letter waives any of my rights or remedies, all of which are expressly reserved.
@JtotheAY
One of the reasons I don’t like socialism is public bathrooms.
A public bathroom is about as basic a shared resource as you can get. Everyone gets to use it, and everyone is expected to show a little consideration for the next person. The rules aren’t particularly complicated.
And yet, a shocking number of adults can’t even manage to throw their paper towels in the trash. Some will pee all over a toilet seat and leave it for the next person. And the next person, who didn’t make the mess, certainly isn’t going to clean it up either.
Now imagine trusting these same people to collectively manage an entire economy.
We can’t even get everyone to agree that cleaning up their own pee is a personal responsibility, but somehow we’re supposed to believe everyone will become hardworking, responsible, and considerate when we’re sharing the fruits of each other’s labor.
Now, compare your average public restroom to a Buc-ee’s bathroom.
Buc-ee’s figured something out. Clean bathrooms attract customers. Customers spend money. So the company has a financial incentive to keep those bathrooms spotless. They hire people to maintain them, hold employees accountable, and compete for your business.
And people will literally plan their road trips around stopping there.
That’s capitalism. Someone recognized a problem, found a way to solve it, and made money because people valued the result.
Of course, not everyone contributes equally to society. Some people work harder, make better decisions, and take more responsibility. Others seem perfectly content making life more difficult for everyone around them.
I believe people should have the freedom to live however they choose. I also believe in helping people who genuinely need it.
But I have a hard time accepting an economic philosophy that expects me to trust everyone to act in the collective interest when some people can’t be bothered to clean up after themselves.
Buc-ee’s figured out how to get people to willingly pay for a better experience.
Socialism wants me to believe the people leaving paper towels on the floor will suddenly become responsible stewards of everyone else’s resources.
I’m going with the beaver.
GIVEAWAY
I’m late, I’m sorry!
This week one winner is getting a new Red Ryder!
One winner is getting a Western Carbine in Sky Blue aka Infantry Blue!
Rules:
Like this post
Follow us
Share this post via repost or quote post
Be in the USA
Winners will be announced here Monday November 16, 2026
We do these Giveaways to keep American Traditions Alive, and learning to shoot from parents/grandparents with a @DaisyRifles is as American a Tradition as they get. A very special thank you to Daisy, you guys are AWESOME!
Keep That PMA
🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸