@Rkstrn@_InThisTogether@docrussjackson Unification of reclamation methodology in sufficient number, when done sensibly, that is to say, peacefully, is what a symbol can represent, regardless of what other purpose you ascribe to it.
@_InThisTogether@docrussjackson Support for the flag/s, under which generations fought for what they believed worthy of risking life and limb for, does not necessarily mean swearing allegiance to the state. A unifying symbol, or a reverse psychological attack on it, is down to one's own interpretation.
You cannot have a British government saying illegal foreign immigrants are the first legal priority over tax paying British people - this is an insane position to hold & expect the support of your people. As a government you are now officially working against the electorate
@newstart_2024 This is an example of why Jesus' return will end the world as we know it. Corruption has reached saturation point. Read the bible (KJV) make your choice.
And illegal migrants get 30 min appointments all from comfort of their own hotels and a full care plan. GPs get paid ยฃ153 per illegal they see!
Let that sink in
@dshensmith It's a ruse to address this specific question while ignoring the vastly larger numbers of government approved "legal" immigrants, which represent a more serious impact on the nations' ability to function as it has done traditionally. Right? @ukcolumn et al.
@JMCDelingpole If I may?
What we have here is a failure to communicate.
The subversion at play, on the utilisation of the English and British flag promotion, has to be balanced with righteous indignation of the attack on a nation's identity and a focal point around which to rally support.