@adxtyahq Totally agree!
Meetings and decisions are sooo important!
And it needs to be improved!
Sooo much time and money is wasted on endless meetings without decisions!
If you improve the decision process, you also improve the decision quality!
@TalebWisdom You need to accept that it's OK to be wrong, nobody knows everything and we are all constantly learning!
If you improve the decision-making process, you also improve the decision quality!
@BrianGerman13@piloly Twenty-five minutes of talk and no options on the table. Meetings don't fail because people don't talk.
They fail because nobody maps the actual positions.
Extract every argument → visualize the disagreement → vote on the real options.
Decision in 10 minutes.
@RossDellenger “Talks continue” with a hard date is how committees miss the window.
Meetings don't fail because people don't talk. They fail because nobody maps the actual positions.
Extract every argument → visualize the disagreement → vote on the real options.
Decision in 10 minutes.
@bankmajdur@DFS_India@RBI Re-discussing a signed issue is a meeting about the meeting.
Meetings don't fail because people don't talk.
They fail because nobody maps the actual positions.
Extract every argument → visualize the disagreement → vote on the real options.
Decision in 10 minutes.
@RedSaluteIn Meeting after meeting is not a process. It is a stall. Meetings don't fail because people don't talk.
They fail because nobody maps the actual positions. Extract every argument → visualize the disagreement → vote on the real options.
Decision in 10 minutes.
@AskMichaelTaiwo Transcripts record who spoke.
They still do not score the claim.
What if meeting decisions were based on argument quality, not volume?
Every position mapped. Anonymous voting.
The best logic wins — not the loudest voice.
@OkadikeOnyeisi Volume is often anxiety, not judgment.
What if meeting decisions were based on argument quality, not volume?
Every position mapped. Anonymous voting.
The best logic wins — not the loudest voice.
@DeepPsycho_HQ Pulling someone back in is good manners.
It still leaves the decision with whoever talks most.
What if meeting decisions were based on argument quality, not volume?
Every position mapped.
Anonymous voting.
The best logic wins — not the loudest voice.
@japan_nobunaga Quiet competence does not survive a meeting scored by airtime.
What if meeting decisions were based on argument quality, not volume?
Every position mapped.
Anonymous voting.
The best logic wins — not the loudest voice.
@MejSzn Interruptions are how the loud person keeps the floor.
What if meeting decisions were based on argument quality, not volume?
Every position mapped.
Anonymous voting.
The best logic wins — not the loudest voice.
@admcollingwood The meeting that “always runs long” is usually one person performing.
What if meeting decisions were based on argument quality, not volume?
Every position mapped.
Anonymous voting.
The best logic wins — not the loudest voice.
@shilpa_cn Power and volume get confused in every exec meeting.
What if meeting decisions were based on argument quality, not volume?
Every position mapped.
Anonymous voting.
The best logic wins — not the loudest voice.
@michael_kove@sandislonjsak Midday “quick syncs” are calendar shrapnel.
Batch real decisions.
Everything else is an async argument tree you touch on the manager day.
@ntradsteminist Meetings and decisions are sooo important!
And it needs to be improved!
Sooo much time and money is wasted on endless meetings without decisions!
If we improve the decision process, we improve the decision quality!
@ArtistHaritha@Norse_Codee Totally agree!
Meetings and decisions are sooo important!
And it needs to be improved!
Sooo much time and money is wasted on endless meetings without decisions!
If you improve the decision process, you also improve the decision quality!