D

[D @ariaapollo23]

@PennStateFball @adidas @Tony_Rojas5 @adidasFballUS THANK YOU FOR KEEPING IT CLASSIC ❤️

[D @ariaapollo23]

@Kantrowitz It’s very simple - most people don’t know that when he says “intelligence”, he means compute/ generative output. They think he literally means education and human brains.

[D @ariaapollo23]

@_bbrandonn_ No one is saying the ball was moving…the point is he has to maintain control of the ball for a reasonable amount of time after contacting the ground. He did not.

[D @ariaapollo23]

@tinyshinyhiney @LedyardNFLDraft The difference is what happened before they went to the ground. Adams completed the process of a catch and then went to the ground. Cooks did not complete the catch before going to the ground. Difference is basically a half second of holding the “caught” ball before going down

[D @ariaapollo23]

@Scottswheels @VanceLawrence @DougKyed K sure

[D @ariaapollo23]

@716tax Wasn’t a tie ball. A tie ball is where both players have possession. Receiver never had possession here, as ruled by the officials (it’s subjective, you can disagree but that’s what they ruled)

[D @ariaapollo23]

@Scottswheels @VanceLawrence @DougKyed You can’t review subjective calls. You can’t review PI or holding for example

[D @ariaapollo23]

@_bbrandonn_ Always has been! Find a clip where it wasn’t, I dare you

[D @ariaapollo23]

@jzulgad They usually do try to if they’re in position to do so…

[D @ariaapollo23]

@ToddHallidy Yes and this has always been the case…

[D @ariaapollo23]

@B0stonS22 @DougKyed It’s actually not different at all. Why do you think it’s different?

[D @ariaapollo23]

@BringerOfRain20 Because he caught the ball and made a football move first. He didn’t catch it while going to the ground…

[D @ariaapollo23]

@Jusorenson @redandyellowca1 @Matty_KCSN It’s subjective and up to the refs. A reasonable amount of time. More than a second and a half

[D @ariaapollo23]

@SneakyJoeSports Surviving the ground also means surviving a DB ripping the ball out. The play wasn’t over.

[D @ariaapollo23]

@Scottswheels @VanceLawrence @DougKyed How can you prove that via video? It’s a subjective call like pass interference. You can disagree about it. There’s no objective answer.

[D @ariaapollo23]

@Scottswheels @VanceLawrence @DougKyed Well he doesn’t have control. The refs ruled that he did not and it’s subjective.

[D @ariaapollo23]

@IamCurrie247 @nateanthony_ @B_DiNucci6 Yea he did not. Enjoy.

[D @ariaapollo23]

@IamCurrie247 @nateanthony_ @B_DiNucci6 He didn’t survive impact. He has to hold on to the ball for a period of time after hitting the ground. He had it for like half a second. Not long enough.

[D @ariaapollo23]

@YoungbloodJoe @B_DiNucci6 No football move. He was going to the ground.

[D @ariaapollo23]

@ryKeough @HopsLaw @DougKyed He has to survive the ground and continue to maintain possession for a period of time. It has always been this way. It’s not 3 Mississippi as it is subjective up to the refs, but there has ALWAYS been a time element