Ok here’s a clip of Simone de Beauvoir in an interview delineating EXPLICITLY the importance of sex as a precursor of women’s oppression. I’ll make another recording of a better quality later.
@mkhajdin The women I criticised originally mostly didn’t bring up the issue of disability. Of course disability is another issue, but most upper-middle class who hire them aren’t disabled, are they? But if you want to paint me as a hater of disabled people, do as you wish.
Like, I get it, it’s annoying when people equate women to housework and you wanna leave that label behind.
But nuance is needed and any analysis that’s one-dimensional (“women’s issue” that ignores the class & race element) deserves to be questioned.
Not sure I understand it all the way through.
Based on my understanding feminists are opposed to all kinds of exploitation of women. Just because sex industry involves a more immediate kind of exploitation doesn’t mean that domestic workers aren’t exploited as well.
The answer to this issue isn’t to outsource our misery to other vulnerable women.
That said, in an ideal world, domestic workers will cease to exist because they’re no longer necessary.
Progressives ofc have to advocate for better policies, not justifying exploiting women fgs.
@mkhajdin What an accusation. The issue at hand is radical feminists who said it, so of course they’re under spotlight. I would’ve disagreed all the same had only a man said it.
Houseworkers are more prone to exploitation. They’re poor & usually from racial minority. That’s the issue.
politics is a mess lmao i need more nuanced takes than anything fueled by anger. i’m old, i’m tired of being angry and i just want anything that works in practice.
I understand why "Don't question people's lived experience" is a good social norm, but it runs into the problem that people are reliably incredibly wrong about their lived experience literally all the time.