omg this is so stupid. what's your quest here? why some humble feedback about a company (which i'm guessing) you don't even work for, making you so upset?
i use railway for my work and for hobby projects, lmk if you do work at railway and you think if you have a successful product, you should stop fixing things
weβre thinking of killing plan mode and using the shift+tab hotkey to adjust effort levels
I donβt think the models need plan mode anymore, but if youβre a plan mode diehard would love to get your feedback on why
kit finally finished the blog post
he covers how OpenCode 2.0 is able to modify everything about itself in real time even during running sessions
btw post whatever easter eggs you're able to find
https://t.co/7WZOaygFjK
"plan with a dumb model, implement with an intelligent model" is one of the worst takes of all time
in the end, your goal is to get the best possible code from AI, planning with one model and implementing with another doesn't work at all. you'll end up exhausting your tokens on the intelligent model and still end up with total slop
instead, you should divide your tasks based on intelligence. the core parts of your software goes to astra/fable, less important parts of your software goes to models like glm, sol, opus etc
if fable and astra are already expensive for your codebase you could use them for reviews of critical PRs