One thing that might not be so obvious to younger people who were born once this had worn off, but this kind of stuff was tolerated for so long, at least in part, because it was an expression of strength, power, and confidence from a people that still thought of itself as a dominant majority.
Many of the norms and practices that seem weird now were developed organically in a country with a single dominant majority and a single, beleaguered minority that most people felt sort of sorry for.
None of this functions when the dominant majority loses dominance, when the country becomes legitimately diverse and multicultural.
It was stupid then, too, but this explains why it didn't quite hit people the way it does today.
Let us not forget the valuable contributions that white people have made to our communities and how essential they are to our country. I hope you will be reaching out to white community leaders. Don't look back in anger.
This idea that impoverishing India via the Strait of Hormuz blockade will increase Indian immigration is wrong and stems from a fundamentally leftist view of migration.
Leftists treat migration as a "natural occurrence." It "just happens." The reality is that mass immigration is a deliberate policy choice made by our politicians and facilitated by NGOs. Moreover, the migrants that flooded Europe and the U.S. are not desperately poor. Truly poor people cannot migrate because they cannot even feed themselves. Have you ever seen those videos of African kids with bloated bellies? You think people who lack the caloric intake to swat flies away from their eyeballs are walking halfway across a continent to get to Germany? I've seen true poverty in places like the Philippines. Filipinos living in shit-stinking corrugated tin shack shantytowns are too busy wondering where their next meal is coming from to go to a first-world country.
Look at footage of "Syrian" "refugees." They're all middle or working class by their countries' standards. They have brand-new clothes and smartphones that are nicer than mine. Even then, were it not for libtard NGOs shepherding them, they would die in the Libyan desert or drown on a raft long before they got to Europe. Same with "migrant caravans" in Latin America. A bunch of Venezuelan peasants are not crossing a region as undeveloped and dangerous as the Darien Gap without white-run NGOs clearing the path for them.
Poverty does not drive turd world migration. It's driven by turd world greed and first world Marxism. The Rameshs and Poojas throwing Diwali parties in the middle of a Dallas subdivision were not plucked from a shitsplat village in Andhra Pradesh. They were already doing well in India before coming here. The problem is that "doing well" in India is pitiful compared to America, so they come here out of greed, helped along by corporations, NGOs, and their co-ethnics.
Making India poor will end the flow of Indians because it will wipe out their middle and working classes and deprive them of the resources they need to migrate in the first place. Trump has already shut down and defunded the NGOs aiding mass migration. Indian visa fraud operations are getting busted up every day. The Indian government will not be able to maintain their pro-migration influence network here when fuel riots back home are threatening to topple the government. Maybe they'll start going to Europe instead. That's Europe's problem. But if the British election last week was any indication, even Europeans are sick of the turd world.
Consider this: if poverty is the reason Indians, Africans migrate to the West, why didn't they mass migrate during the Age of Imperialism, when not only were they much poorer, but their countries were part of European empires? The answer is because MIGRATION IS A CHOICE, a choice that was made for us by libtarded politicians who have been run out of power. America is not a woman being violently ravished whose only choice is to close her eyes and hope it's over soon. We can---and are---choosing to say no to the brown flood.