Truly sorry I haven't been around much. I hope you're all well.
I had to change living situations. Reconfigure. It'll be better in the end but it's a lot right now.
What happened over Christmas on X still weighs heavily on me.
I didn't come here to make enemies.
My friends, you are all so brave & beautiful.
So in the mean time, all take heart:
This is the real reason crime is down in Los Angeles
Samantha lives in LA and has had to call 911 for the police four times
Call 1: A homeless person was trying to break into her apartment building. She was outside of her building while it was happening. She called 911, “I was placed on hold for about 10 minutes, and then they told me that since the person was homeless, they would not be sending the cops out, that they would try to get like homeless intervention people out, and it would take no less than an hour”
This was no help
Call 2: This one's really messed up. She watched a 80 year old man “get the sh*t beat out of him” by like a 20 year old. “Like bad, repeatedly, and this kid had his phone out the whole time, was recording it, like beat the shit out of this old, old, old man in the middle of the street, in the middle of Sunset Boulevard. This old man is like lying there bleeding everywhere, and I called the police and nobody came.”
Call 3: Her car was being broken into and someone was attention to steal it. “I waited on hold for 40 minutes before someone picked up and said, "Oh, you have to do that online." She was told how to categorize the incident. They told her wrong and it her police report was rejected. She called back and they said “There’s nothing they can do” and “nothing will be done”
Call 4: “A tweaker was loitering and tweaking outside my apartment for hours and eventually trying to break into it” After he was in the process of trying to break in she called 911 and after 3 hours nobody showed but but they called back to check on her. The man was gone, the cops didn’t help
Crime rates aren’t down in Los Angeles. Residents are just no longer reporting them because this is the response
We see this over and over again
11 trans people have been murdered in the United Kingdom since 2000. All of them were killed by somebody they knew.
In that timeframe, 20 trans people have committed homicide in the UK, including one stranger killing.
There is no trans genocide.
There isn’t even any real persecution.
When it comes to homicide, trans people are the safest demographic in the western world, and it’s past time that members of that community stop pretending to be the most victimy victims ever to be victimized.
🎯🎯🎯
"A fifty year old man who transitions and reports improved wellbeing has not provided evidence that a fourteen year old girl with depression, a trauma history, and no prior indication of gender distress before the age of twelve should receive puberty blockers. The two situations share a vocabulary. They do not share an aetiology, a developmental context, or a risk profile. Using the former to justify the latter is not clinical reasoning. It is the substitution of personal testimony for empirical evidence across a demographic chasm."
The regime in Iran lowered the age of marriage for girls to 13, and all the way down to 9 with "fatherly consent". Before 1979 it was 18.
You support a dictatorship which legalised paedophilia.
The IR is the actual Epstein regime by literal policy, you retarded propagandist.
Hamas rape the little boys, then threaten to out them as 'gay' in a culture where that means DEATH.
Forcing them to join their terrorist organisation.
https://t.co/XLjOaqPu6Y
https://t.co/WtGYUUTvwC
THE GIRLS WON!
Big settlement to punish the school who punished the kids!
You ask why girls don’t just refuse to play when a team sneaks a boy on it? Well, this school did. They even gave up their basketball playoffs. They sat out. But the state punished them severely. The principal’s association banned the entire school from any athletic competitions in the whole state. No team. Nothing. Not even spelling bees or science fairs.
When the hammer of this ideology comes down it comes down hard. Any kid who might be facing a college scholarship for sports? Banned. Shut out. They did this to make an example of the school and terrify any other girls from refusing to participate.
These were high school girls, children really, and the state made them pariahs in the school. Imagine how much guff they got from everyone else.
Well, last year an appeals court told the school they couldn’t do that. But that was 2 years later. 2 years of banishment.
The state just settled a lawsuit against it and thank goodness they won! Of course, it won’t cost the people anything who did this to high school kids. No, it will be taxpayers who pay. Ultimately, the families of the kids who got shatter.
There is a lot of power behind this movement. Power, and bitterness, and abuse.
You’re a woman who’s having migraines and blackouts. You’re afraid, worried, and it’s taken months to get an appointment with the neurologist in whose office you’re sitting, Dr. Jeffrey “Scott” Sloka.
When Dr. Sloka comes in, the nurse leaves, which is weird, but you’re here for a neurology appointment, so you shrug it off. The doctor asks you some questions, and then he tells you he needs to do a vaginal exam and a breast exam.
You don’t understand why, and he doesn’t explain. You want to refuse, but what if you make him angry? What if he refuses to continue the appointment? This is Canada; you waited for five months for this appointment, and your symptoms are getting worse — so you consent, even though you still don’t understand why he wants to examine you in this way.
Once you’re undressed, Dr. Sloka begins the exam by telling you to remove your gown and stand completely naked with arms and legs spread. The nurse still hasn’t come back, but the doctor proceeds anyway. He says something about checking for lumps, but that doesn’t make any sense; he’s a neurologist, not an ob/gyn.
Then you notice that he isn’t wearing gloves.
During the breast exam, he touches you in ways that make you uncomfortable, and that are not a part of an ordinary breast exam. The vaginal exam is worse: the exam lasts an exceptionally long time, and the doctor inserts his ungloved fingers. The nurse still hasn’t returned.
After the appointment, you feel dirty, soiled. You know deep down that you were assaulted, so eventually you work up the courage to file a report.
It opens a floodgate.
By the time the trial starts, Dr. Sloka has already lost his license, having pled guilty in front of the licensing board. He is facing 48 separate charges for the sexual abuse of his patients.
Woman after woman testifies to this man’s inappropriate behavior. Multiple women testify that Dr. Sloka touched them inappropriately and intimately while not wearing gloves; they describe vaginal exams, rectal exams, and breast exams involving contact that had nothing to do with checking for lumps. An underage girl cries as she describes being pressured into a vaginal exam while her mother was banned from the room.
48 counts. 48 victims. 41 women and girls who took the stand to testify about the abuse they endured.
And one more woman: the Crown’s key expert, Toronto neurologist Dr. Vera Bril. She testified that vaginal, rectal, and breast exams are “far outside our standard of practice,” and “far, far outside” of what neurologists typically do. She stated that these intimate exams were “not necessary” for treating or diagnosing the neurological issues presented by the victims. When the judge retires to deliberate, a conviction seems certain.
Except that’s not what happens.
The judge - Justice Craig Perry - discounts the testimony of all 42 women. He singles out Dr. Bril’s testimony in particular as suffering from “profound frailties,” and accused her of displaying “bias.�� He dismisses the victims’ testimonies as well, citing “inconsistencies,” even though none of said “inconsistencies” touched in any way on ex-Dr. Sloka’s guilt.
He accepts ex-Dr. Sloka’s claim that the assaults were medically necessary exams, even though Sloka admits to having performed many of them ungloved, and cannot explain what these exams had to do with any of his victims’ symptoms.
In the end, Justice Craig Perry acquits ex-Dr. Jeffrey “Scott” Sloka on all 48 counts, choosing to believe a (male) defendant who had already admitted his guilt in front of the licensing board over 41 (female) victims and an expert (female) neurologist.
And they say the patriarchy is dead.
Sorry, but if your religion allows women to be raped and sold in slave markets, maybe
it’s time to look at yourself in the mirror and realize your religion is not a religion of peace. It’s pure evil!
"We're not coming after your children. That's a crazy conspiracy! We just need visibility for our acceptance so we're..."
• putting books featuring k!nk in schools k-12
• hosting all ages drag shows
• making children's characters change gender
• taking kids from "non-affirming" parents
• forcing doctors to ask minors about gender and sexuality
• putting boys in girls' locker rooms and bathrooms
• putting Pride flags in classrooms
• creating videos about sex, k!nk, and gender for children
"...bigot."
And to clarify anyone who tries to excuse this:
A 14 year old cannot consent to a 24 year old. Full fucking stop. It is rape. Statutory rape. Exploitation. Grooming.
SB 145 gave judges discretion to spare adults up to 10 years older from the sex offender registry in these non forcible cases with 14 to 17 year olds.
It softened consequences and pushed the lie that a kid’s willingness matters.
The meme cuts through the bullshit.
Using the language “sex with willing children” is sensationalized yes .. because it is exposing what this bill is really saying.
We are right to burn it all down. Kids cannot consent. Adults who do this are rapists. Any policy treating it as a technicality fails children.
End of story.
A 16-year-old boy with autism was euthanized in the Netherlands because his life felt “joyless.”
I’ve treated over 1,300 patients on the spectrum. Many arrived feeling exactly this way. Many are now thriving. Not because we gave up on them, but because we refused to.
His brain wasn’t even finished developing. Autism is not a terminal illness. It is a treatable biological condition rooted in immune dysregulation, microbiome disruption, and metabolic dysfunction.
When a teenager says life is unbearable, the answer is better medicine, not a lethal injection.
Pure Evil.
@HHSGov@elonmusk@SecKennedy
https://t.co/nab2rcbAZM
California is trying to pass a bill that would criminalize investigative journalism with misdemeanors, $10,000 fines, imprisonment, and content takedown.
The proposed bill is titled AB 2624 and was made after I exposed mass fraud by immigrant groups in America.
Under AB 2624, government-funded entities like the Somali “Learing” Daycare centers would be protected from being exposed if they operated inside California.
The enemy truly is within. When our politicians would rather protect fraudsters and illegal migrants, it’s time for us to stand up or face mass oppression from the traitors who “rule” over us.
Hamas commanders:
“Our issue is not just Palestine, our issue is killing every non-Muslim. We will pursue Jews and Christians all over the world. Either they convert to Islam or we’ll kill them!”
In 1978, a study found that 39% of male high school students felt they had the right to rape a girl if she was (a) not a virgin, (b) stoned or drunk, or (c) if she let him touch her breasts.
54% of boys surveyed thought they had the right to force the issue if a girl changed her mind, or if they felt she had led them on.
43% felt entitled to rape a long-term girlfriend if she wasn’t in the mood.
This poll was taken just one year after the (all-male) US Supreme Court ruled that “evolving standards of decency” made the execution of rapists unconstitutional. That year, there were 67,610 reported rapes in the US.
In 2024, there were 127,527. For every 1000 reports, there were 25 convictions
Don’t tell me that active prosecution paired with the death penalty wouldn’t be a deterrent. It won’t stop all rapists, but I’m willing to bet it would stop a lot of the casual ones, the men who rape their female acquaintances because they know they’ll get away with it.
I want to point something else out. When the question was phrased as “he is so turned on he thinks he can’t stop,” only (only!) 39% of male respondents thought rape was an acceptable response.
When the question was phrased differently, as “she gets him excited sexually,” that number jumps from 39% to 51%, even though it’s basically the same exact question. Why the difference?
Simple - in the second question, his arousal is framed as being her responsibility, while in the first question the issue of responsibility is blithely ignored. (In neither question is the hypothetical male under consideration held responsible for his own thoughts and feelings, but that’s no surprise.)
This is Taliban thinking: namely, the belief that women are morally responsible for anything a man does out of lust, from his nasty thoughts to actual rape.
I also want to point out the way the survey phrases the question — not “is it okay to rape,” but “is it okay to hold a girl down and physically force her to have sex.” Researchers have learned that you get more honest answers if the questions are less confrontational.
Nevertheless, these boys were in fact saying that there are circumstances — and quite a few of them! — in which it is okay to commit rape.
The real question is “how many men and boys still think this way?”
Based on the evidence, the answer is still “plenty.”
I want to cry.
They don't see women & gay people as human, that's all there is too it.
And I don't mean Iran. I mean the Western idiots who think Iran knows more than fvck all about women's right, human rights, disarmament & counterterrorism.
They don't see gender apartheid or forced transition of gays.
BREAKING: The Islamic Republic of Iran has been nominated to a United Nations committee tasked with shaping policy on women’s rights, human rights, disarmament, and counterterrorism.
You literally cannot make this up.
The plight of Indigenous Women in Canada is such a perfect example of how modern Leftist thought has no ability to think past 1st order effects and why its all about feeling virtuous over actually solving problems.
We often hear about "murdered and missing indigenous women" and how they get killed at much higher rates than other Canadians, and that these women rarely get justice. The subtext is always that, somehow, the reason for this injustice is some mix of "colonization", "the patriarchy " or "white supremacy". We often hear how bad society is because of this, and how we need to "do better", "check our privilege", and that this is somehow a failing of all of society.
Now at the same time, there has long been a push to address indigenous overrepresenation in prisons, and the solution the Leftists have landed on is the Gladue Rule becoming embedded in the justice system, which requires the court to consider the effects of residential schooling, racism and other factors when deciding sentencing on indigenous ppl found guilty of crimes. In theory, this could be considered an admirable attempt. In practice, what it means is simply that indigenous ppl who commit crimes will almost always be sentenced to significantly less time than anyone else.
But heres the kicker; between 70-80% of murdered and missing indigenous women are killed by Indigenous men. And then these men are giving ridiculously light sentencing BECAUSE they're indigenous, denying the victims justice. The Crown in this story asked for 16 years for this man shooting his wife in her sleep. He was given 6 years, he'll serve 3.
So the injustice against Indigenous women is in large part CAUSED by Leftist attempt to address it. Its a classic example of modern Leftism being so far up their own asses they're pontificating to the rest of society about a problem that THEY THEMSELVES are causing.
Modern Leftism is not capable of solving actual social problems, it's simply a way for privileged bourgeoisie white liberals to virtue signal about their moral goodness at cocktail parties while the marginalized ppl they claim to champion continue to bear the brunt of their shallow and superficial political activism.
Palestinian Islamic preacher: “Virgins of Paradise will have no menstruation, saliva, mucus, urine or excrement;
Muslim men will have the sexual strength of 100 men. We will have several wives/slaves in Paradise.”
Disgusting. Why is it all about sex in the afterlife for them?