KOJO ASANTE

ready to learn new ideas. @manutd is home

[Manchester United @ManUtd]

BRUNO FERNANDES. RECORD-BREAKER.

[Bruno Fernandes @B_Fernandes8]

This is not mine. This is yours. This is ours.

From all the players, staff and everyone involved in the club, to you guys who supported us every single day of the season.

Grateful for your love and support ❤️

[𝐎𝐩𝐨𝐥𝐨𝐭𝐑𝐨𝐧𝐧𝐢𝐞 @opolot_ronnie]

Nike approached Steph Curry to endorse their shoes but Steph said “I will sign a contract only on one condition, to put my favorite Bible verse
Philippians 4:13”

Nike did not like the idea...but Under Armour accepted Steph's condition...His shoes is the fastest selling commodity by Under Armour.

When you honor God, He honors your journey🏀🙏

[KOJO ASANTE @asanteaegis]

@m__godfred @Abrantie_Kiwi @tailorMARIQUE I know Auditors / Compliance officers do routine checks, so how come huge sum of money got involved in such. Unless you tell me the amount involved was done at once.

[KOJO ASANTE @asanteaegis]

@Abrantie_Kiwi Not official, but someone says it was done in a bit

[KOJO ASANTE @asanteaegis]

@Abrantie_Kiwi @tailorMARIQUE For me,this crime involved a cabal of people. It was not pushed or initiated by the guy alone

[KOJO ASANTE @asanteaegis]

@tailorMARIQUE @Abrantie_Kiwi come and bring explanation

[KOJO ASANTE @asanteaegis]

@tailorMARIQUE The Customer is not at fault here. My problem is with the supervisors at the Bank. The Auditors/Compliance officers; how did it reach 12m. Was it poor supervision?

[KOJO ASANTE @asanteaegis]

I’m just imagining the speech 🎤 as a background of Man.Utd vrs Arsenal,

[Sky Sports Premier League @SkySportsPL]

Is commentary scripted or all off the cuff? 🧐

Peter Drury reveals ⤵️

[KOJO ASANTE @asanteaegis]

LeBron J

[KOJO ASANTE @asanteaegis]

@elliot_solution 9. Over 200 tons of human trash..

The trash was not intentionally left for the sake of pollution. It was left for a combination of practical and survival reasons
Source: life facts

[Elliot @elliot_solution]

An American bank partnered with a Nigerian man to launder $308 million of Nigerian government money.

The money left Nigeria through American banks. It then sat quietly in a shell company for years while the man lived comfortably in Texas.

In 2003 American authorities arrested him. He spent six months in federal detention in the United States waiting to be tried.

Before the trial happened he offered to return $163 million.

America accepted. He flew back to Nigeria.

Nobody questioned him. Nobody charged him. Nobody prosecuted him.

He ran for Senate and won. He ran for Governor and won. He ran for Governor again and won.

America returned the $308 million his operation had laundered.

The new president then put him in cabinet.

America did not trust Nigeria with the $308 million.

They tied every dollar to three specific roads. Lagos-Ibadan Expressway. Abuja-Kano Road. Second Niger Bridge.

They even included a clawback clause. Misuse one dollar, pay it all back.

Why the conditions? Because previous loot returned to Nigeria had already disappeared.

Nigeria's own government told the court they had no record of how the earlier billions were spent.

A man who laundered billions is currently Nigeria's Minister of Budget and Economic Planning.

He decides how Nigeria spends its money.

💀🇳🇬🇺🇸

[Anish Moonka @anishmoonka]

You make a cancer-fighting chemical in your brain every night. It kills tumor cells and fixes broken DNA while you sleep. Only works in the dark. The hormone is called melatonin, and when you flip on the lights at 2 AM, your brain stops making it.

Melatonin is the sleep hormone. But it moonlights as your body’s overnight cancer patrol. It chokes off the blood supply to tumors and wakes up your natural killer cells (the white blood cells that hunt down cancer). Melatonin also flips on genes that order damaged cells to stop dividing. Researchers at Tulane ran an experiment where they exposed rats to dim light at night. Not bright light. Dim. The tumors lost their natural growth rhythms and grew nonstop.

The WHO classified night shift work as “probably carcinogenic” in 2007. Reviewed everything again in 2019. Kept the classification. Same risk category as UV radiation.

Your body’s internal clock controls more than when you sleep. It schedules DNA repair. There’s a repair protein called XPA that rises and falls on a 24-hour cycle, timed by your clock genes. When scientists knocked those genes out in mice, DNA repair went haywire and tumors grew faster. The same clock decides when damaged cells kill themselves off before they turn cancerous. Wreck the clock, you lose all of that.

Denmark started paying workers’ comp for this. In 2008, the Danish government said: if you worked night shifts at least once a week for 20+ years and got breast cancer, that’s an occupational disease. Between 2007 and 2011, 110 women got compensated. One was a flight attendant who did 30 years of overnight flights for SAS airlines. No other country has followed.

1 in 5 workers worldwide works night shifts. In the US, that’s around 15 million people, mostly in healthcare, factories, and trucking. The exposure tilts hard toward people who can least afford it: 20% of workers without a high school diploma pull non-daytime shifts vs. under 2% of college grads.

I’ll be straight with you, the science isn’t totally settled. A big 2020 analysis pooling 57 studies and 8.5 million people found no clear overall link between night shifts and cancer. But a 2024 study tracking how risk changes with time on the job told a different story: 9% higher breast cancer risk after 20 years of night work. 13% higher after 30. The lab evidence in animals is clear cut. The human data is messier, the way it always is when you’re studying something millions of people do in a thousand different ways.

[Kia 🧸ྀི @xevekiah]

DNA is really so crazy. Have y’all heard that story about the woman who had a baby with her husband, but when he got a DNA test, it said he wasn’t the father? The mother insisted he was the dad, so they repeated the test multiple times, and it kept saying the same thing. It later came out that, based on the DNA results, he wasn’t the father… but the uncle of the child. Which made no sense because he was an only child. After more extensive testing, they discovered the husband was actually a chimera, meaning he had absorbed his twin in the womb and carried two sets of DNA. So basically… the baby was biologically his twin brother’s child, even though he was the one who fathered it.

[Ken O. Agyapong @realKenAgyapong]

My commitment to ending the no-bed syndrome in Ghana

As a country, we must begin to speak more honestly about the painful reality confronting our healthcare system, the persistent “no-bed syndrome.” It is unacceptable that in this day and age, a Ghanaian in critical condition can be turned away from a hospital simply because there is no bed available.

Over the years, I have made it a personal responsibility to contribute in my own way to easing this burden. At the Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, I supported the Oncology Department with $145,000 cash and about 200 hospital beds to improve emergency and inpatient care.

At the Ho Teaching Hospital, Agogo Hospital in the Ashanti Region, Tamale Teaching Hospital, Assin Fosu Roman Catholic Hospital and many more, I donated beds, wheelchairs and essential medical consumables to enhance patient care and comfort.

During the COVID-19 period, I also extended support across the country with beds, PPEs and other medical logistics valued at approximately one million dollars.

[Elliot @elliot_solution]

The mine is owned by an Australian company. Half the output is already locked in for an American company that had deals with Tesla and LG Chem.

Ghana gets between 5% and 12% in royalties. Right now because prices are low Ghana is getting 5%.

3.6 million tonnes of lithium leaving Ghana over 12 years.

The farmers near the site were told to stop planting 3 years ago because they would be resettled. Nobody has paid them a cedi yet.

[Prof Yateghtegh S K 🇳🇬🇷🇼🏁 SKYHUB NIGERIA @YateghteghSKY]

As a prospective PhD researcher in AI (focused on normative reasoning and adaptive systems), I find this interesting.

Inferring authorship from punctuation is a classic example of weak evidence being treated as strong justification.

An em dash is not evidence. It’s punctuation.

If that’s enough to “detect AI,” then we’re not evaluating intelligence—we’re reacting to patterns.

That’s bad epistemology. Worse AI governance.

Interestingly, this is exactly the kind of reasoning failure my research tries to address.

In Defeasible Logic, no single signal should justify a conclusion and especially under uncertainty.

Context always wins.

[Josh Barzon @JoshuaBarzon]

AI is telling me that Genesis Chapter 1… from the Bible (KJV even!) … is “100% AI generated text.”

Let that sink in.

How “intelligent” is “AI”?

[Elnathan John @elnathan_john]

Remember that for anyone to check that your work was written by AI using AI, they will have to feed your original text into AI, and that text entered into AI models can become part of the training data.
So these weird vigilantes are in fact only part of the problem. I think writers need to start pushing pack by clearly demanding that their work not be fed into AI checkers without their permission.
If you make a submission to a publisher or organisation you can say: I do not give permission for my work, in part or in full to be fed into any AI model, whether for the purpose of analysis, fact checking or AI-use detection.
Because if you want to become a virtue signalling anti-AI vigilante you do not get to use AI as your cudgel.