@comeytakeit Anthony is likely remorseful and regrets how the events turned out, and his parents obviously wish he hadn't done that. He's on trial for murder. What exactly is your point?
@comeytakeit Insult after insult. Anthony is accused of murder, what's your point? The one with the "low IQ" hasn't insulted you once. You're projecting.
@comeytakeit That's not how regret works. The parents can't regret how another independent variable acted. They can only regret what they could directly or indirectly control. Furthermore, you (improperly) used the word regret, not me.
@comeytakeit@BK_McCallum I guarantee you the Metcalf family wishes he had gotten an adult, and I guarantee you his family would rather he not put his hands on someone. Because the Metcalf boys certainly don't have the capacity of violence.
Chud the Builder was acting highly provocatively. But here’s the problem: who draws the line of what behavior is “provocative” and what is not?
Just because someone is acting provocatively does not eliminate the right to self-defense.
You know what else the left considers provocative? Supporting Trump.
You know who else was “acting provocatively” according to the left? The Trump House guy. He’s now dead — beaten to death by a crazed leftist for “acting provocatively” by supporting Trump.
I believe the Trump House guy had the right to shoot and kill his attacker. Did Chud the Builder not have that same right when he shot his attacker?
@jasonwhitlock You seem like a decent nig, but you gotta stop coping by calling me a psyop. What’s going on with me and those who support me, is the most organic social change this country has seen in many years. There’s no going back. The Chud is out of the bag.
You screaming “JESUS JESUS JESUS” on stage but when it’s time to put your faith to work and do what Jesus would do you’re on mute. This performative Christianity is ridiculous
@RadRandolph The video proves his hand wasn't on the gun, although sure, that fact will come out. The gun could have stayed on Alex's person without him being shot. Possessing a gun does not justify shooting him. They didn't need to reasonably know the gun was out to refrain from shooting.
@GoodTimesArie If you want to include what happened weeks prior to what happened a couple days ago, that's a terrible look for the officers who killed him. The court is not good to take what happened weeks ago into account when judging the officers behavior. That's what this is about.
@RadRandolph You're talking about analysis, the officers belong in a court room so they can be judged on their actions. What happened 2 weeks prior will not matter. If it does, it's premeditated murder.