Interesting work. At ASPIDIA we develop on-site PFAS destruction: TriClean (cavitation + oxidation) and DEHA (engineered enzymes) mineralize them into harmless byproducts with low energy and no secondary waste. Destruction at source is the sustainable way.
From superheated water to sound waves, researchers are testing ways to destroy PFAS—and weighing the costs of cleanup.
Learn more: https://t.co/KKDWDGFG03
Yes, PFAS contamination is likely underestimated—not only in drinking water, but especially in wastewater, the sea and the environment, from which it can migrate from one continent to another.
Actual PFAS levels in U.S. drinking water may be twice the reported figures, understating the long-term risk.
We need low-cost, effective mineralization methods that fully destroy these compounds instead of just moving them around—otherwise the burden keeps growing.
The amount of “forever chemicals” in drinking water in the U.S. could be twice as high as reported in federal monitoring data, a study found.
PFAS have been linked to increased risk of cancer and cardiovascular issues, among other issues. https://t.co/neFs6aIWek
@Federchimica -13% di produzione chimica in Italia: persa la capacità produttiva, non torna più.
Senza chimica non esiste innovazione, ma solo dipendenza dall'estero.
Il Governo intervenga subito: difendere la produzione significa difendere la sovranità industriale.
467 pregnant women, Odense Child Cohort: each doubling of PFOS, PFOA or PFNA in early pregnancy was associated with about 5-6% lower 24h urinary aldosterone later on.
Association, not cause; no link with plasma levels.
Source: doi 10.1016/j.envres.2026.125781
#PFAS
Project Viva: PFAS at age 8 were associated with few DNA methylation changes, and only one was seen again in adolescence.
Epigenetic age effect: 0.02 years. Modest findings deserve visibility too.
Source: doi 10.1016/j.envres.2026.125759
#PFAS
@Rainmaker1973 Agreed that nobody can clean the rain. But the global cycle keeps being fed by concentrated sources: industrial effluents, landfill leachate, foam sites. Every gram destroyed there, not relocated, is a gram that never reaches the oceans or the atmosphere.
@toobaffled PFAS in rain don’t come from contrails: they cycle through the atmosphere via sea-spray aerosols and industrial emissions, as the Stockholm study itself explained.
What’s already out there can’t be recalled. The lever that matters is destroying PFAS at the source.
Network toxicology links PFOA to male reproductive disorders via 10 shared genes (AR, ESR1, NOS, BCL2...).
Source: doi 10.1186/s12610-026-00328-y
Computer predictions plus preliminary cell tests, typically at high doses: relevance to humans unknown.
@NanotechnoWorld Congrats to the ASU team on a real destruction step. Next tests that matter: real matrices (not spiked water), full energy and total cost per m³ with palladium at today’s prices, and a detailed accounting of which by-products form, since 83% defluorination leaves 17% to explain.
Bacillus isolates from textile wastewater produce a laccase that decolorizes black, yellow and red dyes at pH 7 and 42 °C.
Bacterial enzymes can break down industrial pollutants: a basis for industrial remediation.
Source: doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0354516
Full-scale composting plant: 33 PFAS at 4.1 μg/kg in feedstock, 4.0 in finished compost.
Composting does not remove PFAS, and oxidizable precursors hide more. Leachate and pit sediments carry them too.
Source: doi 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2026.145108
In 1,000+ healthy men, PFAS in seminal plasma (not blood) were associated with longer sperm telomeres; no link with mitochondrial DNA copy number.
Association, not cause: the biology is open.
Source: doi 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2026.143663
River biofilm exposed to 100 ng/L for two months concentrated PFOS about 15,000-fold and 6:2 FTS about 850-fold.
Source: doi 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2026.120850
Accumulation is not removal: it moves PFAS into the base of the food web.
117 Australian tap water samples, 75 PFAS targeted, 65 detected.
Levels low (median 1.4 ng/L), but the 6 PFAS regulated by U.S. EPA were a median 11% of the total.
A short monitoring list misses most of the mass.
Source: doi 10.1016/j.envpol.2026.129260
Fruit flies carry PFAS out of landfills: an estimated 1.49 kg/year across China, rising with warming, especially GenX and 6:2 FTS.
Source: doi 10.1016/j.envpol.2026.129264
A landfill is an active PFAS source. Leachate is the bigger exit: destroy PFAS there.
ECHA's committee recommends classifying TFA as reprotoxic and very persistent in water.
Before new rules: can we destroy it at scale? At what cost? With what benefit?
ECHA could start by funding TFA destruction research.
Destroying PFAS is our work at ASPIDIA. #PFAS#TFA
Mice exposed to PFAS for 7 weeks: brain levels similar to other organs, and brain metabolic changes mirrored in plasma, mainly steroid hormones.
Source: doi 10.1016/j.envpol.2026.129257
High doses, mouse model: relevance to humans unknown.
In 32-week tests, Pseudomonas degraded the polyacrylamide in polymer-modified bentonite barriers.
Source: doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0357812
Bacteria can break down synthetic polymers: the capacity industrial bioremediation builds on to destroy contaminants.
Three estuarine fish species exposed during development to a realistic concentration of PFHxS, with salinity as a second stressor.
Source: doi 10.1016/j.cbpc.2026.110703
Experimental models: relevance to humans unknown. Estuaries get PFAS continuously: stop them at the source.