@irinatoxi AI probably won’t make great 3D art automatic. It will make the technical distance between an idea and an editable scene dramatically shorter
@ScottyBeamIO The strongest point here is attaching the agent to something companies already understand and pay for. “AI agent” is vague. “Weekly competitor research delivered automatically” is a service
FABLE 5 LOOKS BETTER. GPT-5.6 SOL MOVES BETTER.
Fable delivers bigger fire, stronger camera movement, and a more cinematic first impression.
But at 0:09, it completely overcooks the ending. The skater spins in the air and suddenly launches upward like a rocket.
GPT-5.6 Sol is less dramatic, but the board, rider, and trick stay connected from start to finish.
For an actual production shot, I’d take GPT.
Which one wins?
https://t.co/qcsbM506s3
FABLE 5 LOOKS BETTER. GPT-5.6 SOL MOVES BETTER.
Fable delivers bigger fire, stronger camera movement, and a more cinematic first impression.
But at 0:09, it completely overcooks the ending. The skater spins in the air and suddenly launches upward like a rocket.
GPT-5.6 Sol is less dramatic, but the board, rider, and trick stay connected from start to finish.
For an actual production shot, I’d take GPT.
Which one wins?
https://t.co/qcsbM506s3
KIMI K3 BUILT THE BETTER MONSTER — THEN LOST THE FIGHT.
The creature looks bigger, heavier, and far more intimidating.
But Fable 5 handles the actual sequence better: cleaner movement, clearer framing, and a more cinematic flow.
Design or direction?
https://t.co/tBGpRI2iPC
@0xAIGOATexe Most personal assistants don’t fail because they lack compute. They fail because every session starts like you’ve never met before. Fixing continuity may matter more than adding another GPU