this isn't controversial at all there's obvious differences in philosophy and development
linux is made to be portable and is a continuous open-source contribution-based development stretched over the better part of 3 decades
YOU're the one making it sound controversial
A Google researcher says the Windows NT kernel still “puts Linux to shame” in many ways.
Laurie Kirk, a former Microsoft reverse engineer, argues that NT was built with a cleaner and more consistent security model.
Linux took a different path, adding capabilities, namespaces, cgroups and SELinux over time.
But her most controversial point is about AI agents.
Kirk argues that Linux permissions are spread across too many mechanisms, while NT handles resources, permissions and auditing more consistently.
She even says that if we designed an OS kernel from scratch in 2026, it probably wouldn’t look like Linux.
Linux engineers are already pushing back, defending the modular approach that helped Linux dominate servers, cloud and containers.
Windows vs Linux just got interesting again.
Full story: https://t.co/AaEj3YAGE0
there's no conceivable explanation for lewis' ferrari switch other than the stupendous amount of money he made from it
like you can't tell me he was oblivious about this being his future
there's no way he just threw a tantrum over not having the fastest car for a few years
🚨 WILLIAMS HAS COMPLETELY CHANGED ITS CARBON-FIBER PROCESS
After 15 YEARS using the same method, Williams has introduced an entirely new way of manufacturing its large carbon structures.
The project was kept SECRET — only 7 members of the design team and 12 production staff knew the full process.
⚖️ The result: a LIGHTER and STRONGER chassis that has already passed every test.
(via. @Motorsport_IT) #F1