P4433-As per my astrological calculation government of Bharat and state of Uttar Pradesh should be on high alert, from last quater of 2026 to 2027 the atmosphere in the country will be vitiated. This will be a deliberate conspiracy.
मेरी ज्योतिषीय गणना के अनुसार, भारत सरकार और उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य सरकार को हाई अलर्ट पर रहना चाहिए, क्योंकि 2026 की आखिरी तिमाही से लेकर 2027 तक देश का माहौल खराब किया जाएगा। यह एक सोची-समझी साज़िश होगी।
Update: Finally we have cancelled the order because there was no response from fraud @flipkartsupport even after 10 days. Well done guys 👏👏 You deserve all the hate you get. Fraud people. Fraud company.
@_Kalyan_K@jagograhakjago
Better everyone opt for @amazon
I'm sorry for the inconvenience. Our team is looking into your concern related to order delivery. Please be assured that you'll hear from us. Your patience is greatly appreciated. Please do not share your order details on this social platform as they are visible to all. Kindly delete the details to ensure your details are secure and reach out to us via private chat by clicking the link below. Awaiting your response.
Absolutely horrendous experience ordering a mobile phone with @Flipkart@flipkartsupport
Ordered it on 3rd. Delivery was estimated on 9th. Then it was changed to 10th, 11th, 12th and now 13th. Worst part is no executive is able to help. I am taking leaves from office to be 1/2
@flipkartsupport How many more hours will you keep me waiting morons?? @flipkartsupport@jagograhakjago kindly take cognizance of this fraud company and it's practices. Its been more than 72 hrs and no attempt made to either connect or solve the issue.
@flipkartsupport There has been no attempt made to call or communicate. I don't understand whom you guys are calling and taking note back. Are you serious??
@flipkartsupport Update: No call received whatsoever from @flipkartsupport or their executives. No attempt made to deliver the product either. Shame on you guys. Pathetic service. No option left than to approach consumer forum for further escalation. @jagograhakjago
🚨: Scientists using satellite and seismic data have discovered that Earth produces a puzzling pulse every 26 seconds, often described as its "heartbeat."
EARTH MAY ITSELF BE A LIVING BEING!
Yes, yes. Sanatan Dharma tells about that ocean. The ocean name is Ksheer-sagar where Kshirodakshayi Vishnu lies on Anant Sesa. What NASA and West is finding out now is there in Vedic literatures. That’s why the greatest astrophysicist of all time, Carl Sagan said that "
The Hindu religion is the only one of the world’s great faiths dedicated to the idea that the Cosmos itself undergoes an immense, indeed an infinite, number of deaths and rebirths.
It is the only religion in which the time scales correspond to those of modern scientific cosmology. Its cycles run from our ordinary day and night to a day and night of Brahma, 8.64 billion years long. Longer than the age of the Earth or the Sun and about half the time since the Big Bang."
There are 7 billion versions of Earth right now. One for every human nervous system rendering it.
Yes, your brain has never once, in your entire life, shown you the world as it actually is.
Every single thing you've ever seen, touched, smelled, or believed was real?
A construction. A highly convincing hallucination assembled inside roughly 1.4 kg of electrochemical tissue that has never directly touched reality and never will.
The deeper implication of this runs so far beyond philosophy that most people stop engaging with it the moment it starts threatening their comfortable assumptions. So let's go there anyway.
Neuroscientist Anil Seth calls conscious experience a "controlled hallucination." But that framing still doesn't fully land for most people because we treat the word hallucination as a malfunction — something that happens to people who are unwell.
Strip that stigma away and what remains is staggering: the brain iis a prediction engine. It doesn't wait for sensory data to arrive and then interpret it. It generates a model of what it expects to be there, sends that model out ahead of incoming signals, and then only updates when the prediction errors become too loud to ignore.
You are, at all times, living approximately 80 milliseconds in the past — and inside a story your brain wrote before your eyes even opened.
The color red you see isn't in the apple. The apple emits no redness. Photons at roughly 700 nanometers enter your eye, stimulate certain cone cells, and your visual cortex translates that signal into a subjective experience your particular nervous system calls red.
Someone with different cone receptors — or a mantis shrimp with sixteen photoreceptor types compared to your three — inhabits a genuinely different visual universe while looking at the exact same apple. Neither is seeing "the real apple." Both are seeing what their biology decided was worth rendering.
The philosopher Thomas Nagel once asked what it is like to be a bat.
The question sounds playful until you realize he was pointing at something structurally thought provoking:
"there is no view from nowhere."
Every consciousness has a species-specific, individual-specific interface with reality. And interfaces, by definition, are not the thing itself. A GUI on your computer shows you folders and icons. Behind it is machine code, electrical states, binary operations — none of which look anything like the folders. The interface was designed for usability, not transparency.
Your perceptual system was designed for survival, not truth.
Evolution rewarded useful perception. Ancestors who correctly modeled a rustling bush as a predator — even when it wasn't — survived longer than those who needed certainty before reacting. The bias toward false positives is baked into your biology. Which means you are structurally, neurologically, evolutionarily inclined to see threats, patterns, and meanings that may have no basis in external reality. Your anxiety isn't irrational. It's an overactive survival interface interpreting a modern world through ancient rendering software.
Donald Hoffman, a cognitive scientist at UC Irvine, spent years building mathematical models to test whether accurate perception of reality would confer evolutionary advantages. His conclusion: organisms tuned to perceive reality as it actually is consistently lose, in evolutionary simulations, to organisms tuned to perceive fitness-relevant information. Seeing the truth is expensive. Seeing what keeps you alive is efficient. So that's what got selected for — relentlessly, across millions of years.
What you're left with is a species that experiences a seamlessly rendered simulation of reality and has almost no intuitive access to the machinery generating it.
And yet, the simulation is consistent enough across human nervous systems that we built civilization inside it. We agreed, implicitly, on what tables feel like and what gravity does and what fire means. Shared hallucination became culture, became language, became science — which is, ironically, the only tool we've developed precise enough to start revealing the hallucination for what it is.
Meditation practitioners figured out a version of this without the neuroscience. Sit still long enough and observe the contents of your mind without identifying with them, and the constructed nature of experience starts to become viscerally apparent. Thoughts arise. The sense of "I" that seems to be watching them also arises. The boundary between self and world — which feels so absolute in ordinary waking life — starts to look like another rendering decision, not a metaphysical fact.
The self is part of the simulation too.
Most people stop at the philosophical discomfort this creates and retreat back into practical reality — bills to pay, emails to answer, a life to live inside the model.
That's fine. Functional. But there's a version of absorbing this that produces something closer to radical humility.
If your perception is an interface, your beliefs about other people are low-resolution renders.
Your certainty about what someone meant, what they intended, who they are — all of it filtered through a system that prioritizes your survival narrative over their actual inner life. Every conflict you've ever had lived, at least partly, inside mismatched simulations that neither party could fully step outside of.
Every opinion you hold with absolute confidence was formed by a brain that has never once had unmediated access to the thing it formed an opinion about.
That doesn't make truth impossible. It makes humility the only honest starting point.
W e live so deep inside the map that most people die never having questioned whether the territory looks anything like what they spent their whole life navigating.
The most dangerous assumption in human history isn't political, religious, or philosophical.
It's the assumption that time moves in one direction.
Every decision you've ever made, every regret you carry, every "if only I had done that differently" — all of it rests on a single premise so deeply embedded in your cognition that questioning it feels like questioning gravity. The premise is this: the past is fixed, the present is fleeting, and the future is where change lives.
Physicists just cracked that premise open at the quantum level.
When researchers examined quantum systems operating without the interference of classical observation, they found something that doesn't fit inside our ordinary language cleanly. Quantum particles don't experience a "before" and "after" the way you do walking from one room to another. At the quantum scale, physical processes unfolded in both temporal directions simultaneously — the math describing the system forward in time and the math describing it backward in time were both required to fully describe what was actually happening. Neither direction was the "real" one. Both were physically valid. Both were present at once.
To understand why this is catastrophic for our intuitions, you need to understand where our sense of time's direction actually comes from.
The laws of physics — Newton's laws, Maxwell's equations, even Einstein's relativity — are all time-symmetric. Run the equations forward or backward, they work identically. A video of billiard balls colliding looks physically valid whether you play it forward or in reverse. The mathematics doesn't care which direction time flows. There's no equation in classical physics that says "this way and only this way."
The only reason we experience time as a one-way arrow is thermodynamics. Specifically, entropy — the tendency of systems to move from ordered states to disordered states. A coffee cup shatters on the floor. It never spontaneously reassembles. Smoke disperses into a room. It never gathers back into a neat column. You can explain the direction of time entirely through the statistical improbability of disorder reversing itself at the macroscopic scale. Billions of atoms would have to coordinate their motion with extraordinary precision to run the movie backward. It's not impossible. It's just so astronomically unlikely that we call it impossible and build our entire civilizational concept of cause and effect on top of that statistical preference.
But entropy is a macroscopic phenomenon. It emerges from the behavior of massive numbers of particles averaging out into irreversible directionality.
At the scale of individual quantum particles, you don't have that averaging. You have one particle, or a handful, operating beneath the threshold where thermodynamic arrows become meaningful. And at that scale, the universe genuinely does not commit to a direction.
The observation of bidirectional time at quantum scale is not a metaphor or an interpretation. Researchers working with quantum heat engines — systems that exchange energy between quantum states — found that the arrow of thermodynamic time, the very thing that gives us past and future, broke down. Heat flows in ways that classical thermodynamics says should be impossible. The system doesn't recognize which end is the beginning.
What gets philosophically explosive is what this means for causality.
Our entire model of agency — of making choices, of living with consequences — is causality. Cause precedes effect. You do something, then something results from it. The arrow of time is what makes cause and effect distinguishable from each other at all. Remove the arrow, and cause and effect become two labels for the same bidirectional relationship rather than a sequence. Your action and its consequence are more like two ends of a rubber band than two points on a timeline.
Physicists like Yakir Aharonov spent decades developing what's called the two-state vector formalism — a mathematical framework for quantum mechanics that takes both the past and the future boundary conditions of a particle into account simultaneously when describing its present state. In this formalism, what a particle "is" right now is shaped by both what happened before it and what will happen after it. The future exerts a backward influence on the present the same way the past exerts a forward influence. The present moment sits at the intersection of two temporal streams running in opposite directions, and the particle's state is the product of both.
This isn't philosophy dressed in physics language. It produces testable predictions that differ from standard quantum mechanics. Some of those predictions have been confirmed experimentally through weak measurement techniques that let physicists probe quantum states without fully collapsing them.
The universe, at its most fundamental level, seems to run bidirectional influence as a standard operating procedure.
Now pull back to the human scale — not because quantum effects scale directly into consciousness, that debate remains genuinely open and contested — but because of what this does to your mental model of time as a container.
You likely carry your past as a fixed object. Something that happened, solidified, and now sits behind you exerting weight. The psychological gravity of past events — failures, traumas, identities formed under pressure — feel immovable precisely because time feels immovable. The past's power over you is borrowed almost entirely from its apparent permanence.
But if time at the fundamental level is not a river with a fixed source and mouth — if it folds, if it runs in both directions simultaneously, if present states are shaped by future boundary conditions just as much as past ones — then the rigidity you assign to your history is partly a perceptual artifact. Not because you can literally change what occurred, but because what something means, how it functions in your present, what causal weight it carries — all of that is not actually locked inside the past event. It lives in the relationship between that event and where you're moving.
Physicists call it retrocausality when future states influence present ones backward through time. Psychologists call it recontextualization when future growth changes how past events are processed and integrated. The mechanisms are wildly different in scale and kind. But both are pointing at the same fundamental feature: the present is not downstream of a fixed past. It sits between competing temporal influences running in both directions.
The reason this observation lands differently than a philosophy lecture is that it came from laboratory equipment measuring heat transfer in quantum systems. Nobody was trying to validate a spiritual framework or a therapeutic model. They were running thermodynamic experiments at quantum scale and found that the clock they assumed was running in one direction was running in both simultaneously.
What we call "moving forward in time" may be the macroscopic average of a process that, underneath, has no preferred direction at all.
That changes what you are inside time.
You are not a creature being passively pushed forward by a current with a fixed past behind you and an open future ahead. At the level where reality is built, you exist at a fold — a point where two directions of time press against each other and produce what you experience as "now." The choices you make at that fold don't just generate a future. They participate in defining what the fold itself means, which includes how past states function inside your present system.
The past isn't behind you.
It's still arriving.
The signal strength hitting Earth from Voyager 1 is less than one trillionth of a watt.
To put that in perspective, your phone’s WiFi signal is roughly 100 billion times stronger, and it drops a connection walking between rooms.
NASA picks up Voyager’s whisper using arrays of 70-meter antennas, then reconstructs coherent data from it at 160 bits per second. That’s slower than a 1990s modem. Downloading a single photograph at that rate would take weeks.
The spacecraft itself runs on 8.8 kg of decaying plutonium-238 that generated 470 watts at launch in 1977. Today it produces roughly 200 watts, losing about 4 watts per year. NASA has been shutting down instruments one by one since the 1980s to keep the math working. They turned off the cosmic ray sensor just this year.
And here’s the part nobody’s talking about: there is exactly one antenna on Earth that can send commands to Voyager. Deep Space Station 43 in Canberra. It went offline for major upgrades from May 2025 through early 2026. During that window, if Voyager had a critical fault, the team would have had to wait months to respond.
A 48-year-old spacecraft built on 1970s computing, running on a plutonium battery that’s lost 60% of its output, transmitting at a power level that barely qualifies as existing, from a distance where light itself takes 23 hours to arrive. And a German observatory just casually picked up its carrier signal on a live stream.
The engineering margin NASA built into this mission was designed for 4 years to Saturn. Everything after that is borrowed time the engineers keep extending by doing math with 200 watts.
Rio Ferdinand won the Premier League multiple times, captained Manchester United to the Champions League victory in 2008, retired from football, became a top pundit on TV, launched successful YouTube channels and podcasts, got awarded an honorary doctorate for his work on inequality and leadership, moved to Dubai for a new chapter with his family, started building his media empire and business ventures, brushes his teeth every single day like a responsible adult… and Arsenal have still not won the UCL.
Shiva & Brahma give boons to demons because their cosmic roles are to respond to effort and intensity, not to judge moral outcome.
In Hindu philosophy, Brahma represents creation and identity, while Shiva represents energy, will, and dissolution.
When anyone performs extreme tapas, the force of that discipline generates power. Brahma & Shiva respond to that power automatically, the way fire responds to fuel. They reward the strength of focus, not the quality of intention.
Vishnu represents preservation and balance.
His role is to protect cosmic order, not to distribute raw power.
If Vishnu gave destructive boons, the universe would collapse.
Psychologically, Shiva & Brahma mirror parts of the human mind that reward obsession and ambition.
Vishnu mirrors the part that keeps life stable and humane.
So demons approach Shiva & Brahma for power.
Devotees approach Vishnu for harmony.
This is sheer harassment @tvsmotorcompany
The dealer must be held responsible at all cost. No response since last 10 days shows lack of empathy and commitment towards the consumer. Pathetic. Kindly find a solution in this matter.
@tdkarnataka@MORTHIndia
@tvsmotorcompany purchased a Jupiter from Suryapratap TVS Thanisandra. Received a damaged scooter, and refused delivery. Scooter is still at the showroom. Customer care refuses to respond even after 10 days of this incident. Do you want to take this matter to the @jagograhakjago