![amutambara's tweet photo. Robert Mugabe on Herbert Chitepo (and a Rejoinder on the Missed Opportunity of the 2017 Coup)
Book Excerpt from: In Search of the Elusive Zimbabwean Dream, Volume III (Ideas & Solutions)
By Professor Arthur G.O. Mutambara
In private discussions, Mugabe has immense respect for Herbert Chitepo – Zimbabwe’s first Black barrister (qualified in 1954), ZANU’s distinguished Chairman, a dedicated revolutionary and resolute freedom fighter – who was killed in Zambia on 18 March 1975.
He explains that the main reason he went to Ghana in 1957 was to work and raise money so that he could go to London and train as a lawyer like Chitepo.
Robert Mugabe says:
“Herbert Chitepo was my role model.”
Even when he returns from Ghana and joins the nationalists in 1960 (NDP), Mugabe is under the political tutelage of Herbert Chitepo.
I guess his narcissism and inflated ego would not allow him to publicly acknowledge Chitepo as a personal inspiration or potential mentor.
Of course, he wants to ride on the farcical fiction and myth cultivated by his ZANU-PF sycophants, propagandists and bootlickers that he is the alpha and omega of Zimbabwe’s liberation struggle.
Zimbabwe’s only founding father, a freedom fighter with neither peers nor equals.
It is as if Robert Mugabe was carrying two guns and fighting alone to liberate the country.
Shame!
Yet, by the end of the war in 1979, he could not even fire a pistol.
The only African leader Mugabe acknowledges publicly is Kwame Nkrumah.
“He was my inspirer,” he asserts on one occasion at a public event.
I guess Nkrumah is too distant from Zimbabwe’s liberation struggle to dent Mugabe’s unflinching and firm grip on its narrative.
The ZANU-PF functionaries (with Mugabe’s blessing) would want the country to believe that Chitepo wanted to be like Mugabe.
Quite the opposite!
Robert Mugabe was unworthy and unqualified to untie Herbert Chitepo’s shoes.
This, he confesses to me, without equivocation or ambiguity.
I also discover that, quite contrary to ZANU-PF’s inspired conventional wisdom, buttressed by his own public utterances, Mugabe does not share the view that the external ZANU’s Dare ReChimurenga (Revolutionary War Council) and the ZANLA High Command were completely innocent in the death of Herbert Chitepo.
Privately, Robert Mugabe does not believe in that cheap propaganda.
A cruel distortion of history.
While he sees the potential hand of Ian Smith and the likely complicity of the Zambian government – given Kenneth Kaunda’s antipathy towards ZANU and undiluted affinity for ZAPU – he is quite disparaging about the goings-on in ZANU’s Dare leading to Chitepo’s death.
He was quite fond of John Mataure – Dare’s Political Commissar – who Tongogara (Dare Secretary of Defence and ZANLA High Command’s Chief of defence) and other Dare leaders shamelessly acknowledge “was killed at the hands of ZANU” after the crushing of the Nhari Rebellion, and just before the assassination of Herbert Chitepo.
Mugabe says:
“How could they do that?
John Mataure was a good man – a committed freedom fighter.
He is the one I gave the party office keys when I left Tanzania for Rhodesia in 1963.
My information is that they asked William Ndangana to do the actual killing since he was also a Manyika like John.
This was supposed to demonstrate Ndangana's loyalty and absolve him of the Manyika conspiracy they were levelling against John Mataure and Herbert Chitepo.
It was terrible and unconscionable stuff.
The goings-on in Dare and the High Command in 1974 and 1975 were quite deplorable."
I must state that Mugabe’s position that Ndangana did the gruesome and despicable killing of John Mataure is disputed by Rugare Gumbo, ex-Dare ReChimurenga Information and Publicity Secretary (the only surviving Dare member).
In my conversation with him in August 2022, a visibly agitated Rugare Gumbo asserts that:
“No, that is not correct. It was Robson Manyika who did it.
William Ndangana had been one of those arrested by the Nhari rebels.
Mugabe blames Ndangana to shield and protect Robson Manyika – a fellow Zezuru.”
Indeed, 1974 and 1975 are really ugly years in the history of ZANU.
Unbridled ethnic conflict, internal strife and violence, unprecedented power struggles, and gruesome murder among revolutionary colleagues.
The Nhari Rebellion occurs in November 1974, during the liberation struggle, when ZANLA cadres in Chifombo, Zambia, rebel against ZANU’s Dare ReChimurenga (War Council) leadership and the ZANLA High Command.
The uprising is led by ZANLA Field Commanders Thomas Nhari and Dakarai Badza.
The uprising is viciously thwarted, and all the key participants and leaders are brutally executed.
In the trials conducted by ZANU’s Dare ReChimurenga after the Nhari Rebellion, the Political Commissar John Mataure is accused and convicted of collaborating with the rebels.
Various accounts of his execution indicate barbaric torture leading to a gruesome killing.
John Mataure died a terribly painful death.
In the same post-Nhari Rebellion reprisals, Herbert Chitepo, Dare’s Chairman, is pronounced by his colleagues to be a suspect with a curious caveat:
“However, there is not enough evidence at the moment.”
This Dare position on Herbert Chitepo's culpability is well-documented in the literature of that episode.
Nevertheless, when Chitepo is killed on 18 March 1975, ZANU’S Dare ReChimurenga and the ZANLA High Command deny any involvement.
Unsaid in Mugabe’s views and remarks about the circumstances leading to Herbert Chitepo’s death is the intelligent assessment that if you can kill your own party’s Political Commissar (John Mataure) and accept full responsibility for it, what will stop you from killing the party’s Chairman – Herbert Chitepo?
As indicated earlier, Josiah Tongogara (Dare Secretary of Defence and ZANLA High Command’s Chief of Defence) is widely quoted as saying:
“Yes, John Mataure – the Dare Political Commissar was killed at the hands of ZANU.”
How is the murder of the Political Commissar different from that of the Chairman?
Why is it OK to kill your party’s Political Commissar?
Is it a more acceptable crime?
Surely, if organisationally you find it sound, rational and proper to brutally eliminate the Political Commissar of your party, nothing can stop you from taking similar action against the Chairman.
Absolutely nothing!
Moreso, if he is: “Guilty, but no evidence at the moment.”
It is called common sense.
However, what I find most intriguing and revealing is that with all his views about the potential role of ZANU’s Dare ReChimurenga and the ZANLA High Command in the death of Chitepo, ZANU Secretary General Robert Mugabe goes on to, publicly (in 1975 and 1976) and opportunistically, totally absolve (without any shred of evidence) the ZANU Dare leadership and the ZANLA High Command who had been arrested over Chitepo’s death.
He brazenly blames Ian Smith and Kenneth Kaunda for the tragedy.
Of course, this is a Machiavellian masterstroke on Mugabe’s part!
Why?
Because the beleaguered (after having been illegally overthrown by his colleagues while in detention) ZANU President Ndabaningi Sithole – being both principled and naive – condemns the arrested Dare and High Command leaders.
He says:
“ Justice must take its course.
The detained leaders must be tried.”
In that one swift and calculated move alone, Mugabe gets the support of the entire detained Dare leadership and Tongogara’s High Command, while Ndabaningi loses the same folks.
Combining this spectacular feat by Mugabe with the October 1975 Mgagao declaration by ZANLA fighters who endorse him as their spokesperson, he is on his way to taking total and unquestionable control of the external ZANU wing, more specifically and importantly, the ZANLA forces.
Whoever controls the ZANLA forces is the ZANU leader.
Period.
Bona’s son’s ascendancy to the leadership of ZANU is now unstoppable!
Conversely, Ndabaningi Sithole’s fate is sealed!
The Dare and High Command leaders detained in Zambia (over Chitepo’s death) are thoroughly disappointed with Sithole.
They are totally disenchanted with him.
In particular, Tongogara is palpably furious and apoplectic with rage.
He says:
“I defended you (Sithole) when you were unprocedurally and fraudulently removed from the presidency of ZANU by Central Committee members in detention [in then Rhodesia].
We condemned and refused to recognise that foolish coup d’état engineered by Edgar Tekere and others.
Now, you are betraying me regarding Chitepo’s death.”
One of the detained ZANU Dare leaders, Information and Publicity Secretary Rugare Gumbo, who later falls out with Mugabe at two separate historical points, says to me:
“When we were detained in Zambia after the death of Chitepo, and Robert Mugabe supported us and blamed Smith and Kaunda for the murder, we said:
‘Now that is our leader.’
We immediately denounced Ndabaningi Sithole and embraced Mugabe.
Of course, we lived to regret it.
We had jumped the gun.
It was a monumental error.”
Rejoinder: Mnangagwa of November 2017 versus Mugabe of April 1980
With hindsight, it is not correct to say that in November 2017, the interests of the political elites (the rulers) coincided with those of the ruled (the ordinary folks).
The elites duped the people into supporting a coup d’état that had nothing to do with people.
The people thought – wrongly – that the departure of Robert Mugabe would signal a break with the past and a step into a new dispensation characterised by a democratic, prosperous and inclusive Zimbabwe.
Yes, people freely marched without coercion or enticement.
However, their agenda and that of the coup plotters were at cross purposes.
Put differently, the coup plotters missed an opportunity to embrace the people’s agenda and harness the global convergence of goodwill that characterised the country, continent and the globe, after the coup.
It was a huge missed opportunity.
The goodwill was shamefully squandered.
In fact, at a cynical level, if they had done that, their rulership could have been sustained while the country would be in better shape.
Lack of strategic thinking, crass, narrow, misplaced self-interest and outright absence of Machiavellian instincts were the order of the day.
Emmerson Mnangagwa miserably failed to utilise the coup d’état dividend to entrench himself effectively.
Indeed, after the coup, because of lack of strategic insight and foresight, Emmerson worked against his own self-interest.
Not to talk about the national interest.
Now, he is thoroughly discredited, gallivanting from one discredited election to the next.
And the country is in a mess!
It did not have to be this way.
Why did Emmerson not learn from his master and mentor?
Robert Mugabe, with all his faults, had better instincts after his victory in the 1980 elections.
He tried to harness the goodwill granted to the new nation by reaching out to Joshua Nkomo and Ian Smith.
Of course, this was short-lived, as Gukurahundi would soon follow.
It was downhill from there.
However, let us examine what he did after his ascendancy in 1980.
Tactically, he knew the Rhodesians could undermine him.
They still controlled the state infrastructure and instruments of violence in all respects.
His party had won but was inexperienced in statecraft.
They were vulnerable.
Although he had won outright – 57 out of 80 of the open parliamentary seats – he needed time to establish an administration and consolidate his grip on national power.
In our discussions at State House, Robert Mugabe clearly explained his intricate and nuanced manoeuvring to me:
“I had to proceed very carefully and strategically, indeed.
We invited our colleagues from ZAPU into government.
With Smith, I told him I wanted to include some of his people in my government.
He wanted to give me the names.
I said: ‘No, I will choose on my own from your people.’
Smith reluctantly agreed.
That is how we ended up with the likes of David Smith, Chris Anderson and Dennis Norman.
In fact, I continued with Ian Smith’s Chief Secretary to the Cabinet – Justice George Smith – for nearly five years.
I also kept Ian Smith’s Private Secretary – Constantine ‘Costa’ Pafitis – up to 1982.
Of course, we continued with all the Rhodesian security chiefs heading the Army, Police and CIO, including Peter Walls, Ken Flower and David ‘Dan’ Stannard.
Well, the Selous Scouts – those we immediately disbanded as an outfit.
More significantly, I would meet with Ian Smith on Monday before every Cabinet meeting which was held on Tuesday.
I did this every week.
I only stopped because Smith was now going around saying:
‘That Robert Mugabe knows nothing.
Every Monday, I give him all the ideas that he is implementing.’
Of course, I had to put an end to the Monday meetings with Ian Smith.
There you are.
So, yes, indeed, we tried to move with care in 1980.
Of course, we never trusted the Rhodesians.
I made them think that I trusted them. When we were good and ready, we got rid of them.
You know how we dealt with people like Peter Walls and others.”
So that is how a Machiavellian Mugabe played the game in 1980!
A cunning, strategic and astute poker player.
Robert Mugabe worked with his worst enemies to consolidate his grip on power and entrench himself.
If only Mnangagwa had 10 per cent of that political aptitude and sophistication in 2017, Zimbabwe would be a different place today.
Even his colleagues and supporters acknowledge Emmerson’s unmitigated folly.
ZANU-PF stalwart Tshinga Dube, in his autobiography released in November 2019, argues that Zimbabwe could have fared much better if Emmerson Mnangagwa had reached out to Morgan Tsvangirai, with a view to set up an inclusive transitional arrangement, soon after the coup d’état of November 2017:
“… If the MDC Alliance was brought closer when the new dispensation was ushered, we would today be in a different situation.
We would have emerged out of the woods and exited a life of perennial doom and gloom.
The lost opportunity has cost us immensely. We have without doubt retrogressed.”
Dube posits that Mnangagwa’s “bid to grab everything while leaving out the main opposition MDC that helped him camouflage to the world as a popular uprising, what had all the hallmarks of a coup, has backfired …”
This is a common-sense position that we have articulated elsewhere in this book.
However, it is refreshing to see the same views being regurgitated by ZANU-PF leaders.
This means that Mnangagwa's lack of strategic thinking, political acumen and governance gravitas is common cause even among his party members.
What a pity.
Zimbabwe deserves a better leader.
This is an excerpt from the book: In Search of the Elusive Zimbabwean Dream, Volume III (Ideas & Solutions)
By Professor Arthur G.O. Mutambara
Book Availability:
1) Most book stores (Harare, Bulawayo, Mutare)
2) Harare & Vic Falls Airports
3) Amazon (e-book and hardcopy in TWO PARTS)
4) SA +27832879091 5) UK +44 7934 117610
6) USA +1 469 777 2669/+1 215 699 4103/+1 678 491 6702
7) Book Fantastics website (Harare) 0779210403](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F_qdh1fW8AAzMtQ.jpg)
![amutambara's tweet photo. Robert Mugabe on Herbert Chitepo (and a Rejoinder on the Missed Opportunity of the 2017 Coup)
Book Excerpt from: In Search of the Elusive Zimbabwean Dream, Volume III (Ideas & Solutions)
By Professor Arthur G.O. Mutambara
In private discussions, Mugabe has immense respect for Herbert Chitepo – Zimbabwe’s first Black barrister (qualified in 1954), ZANU’s distinguished Chairman, a dedicated revolutionary and resolute freedom fighter – who was killed in Zambia on 18 March 1975.
He explains that the main reason he went to Ghana in 1957 was to work and raise money so that he could go to London and train as a lawyer like Chitepo.
Robert Mugabe says:
“Herbert Chitepo was my role model.”
Even when he returns from Ghana and joins the nationalists in 1960 (NDP), Mugabe is under the political tutelage of Herbert Chitepo.
I guess his narcissism and inflated ego would not allow him to publicly acknowledge Chitepo as a personal inspiration or potential mentor.
Of course, he wants to ride on the farcical fiction and myth cultivated by his ZANU-PF sycophants, propagandists and bootlickers that he is the alpha and omega of Zimbabwe’s liberation struggle.
Zimbabwe’s only founding father, a freedom fighter with neither peers nor equals.
It is as if Robert Mugabe was carrying two guns and fighting alone to liberate the country.
Shame!
Yet, by the end of the war in 1979, he could not even fire a pistol.
The only African leader Mugabe acknowledges publicly is Kwame Nkrumah.
“He was my inspirer,” he asserts on one occasion at a public event.
I guess Nkrumah is too distant from Zimbabwe’s liberation struggle to dent Mugabe’s unflinching and firm grip on its narrative.
The ZANU-PF functionaries (with Mugabe’s blessing) would want the country to believe that Chitepo wanted to be like Mugabe.
Quite the opposite!
Robert Mugabe was unworthy and unqualified to untie Herbert Chitepo’s shoes.
This, he confesses to me, without equivocation or ambiguity.
I also discover that, quite contrary to ZANU-PF’s inspired conventional wisdom, buttressed by his own public utterances, Mugabe does not share the view that the external ZANU’s Dare ReChimurenga (Revolutionary War Council) and the ZANLA High Command were completely innocent in the death of Herbert Chitepo.
Privately, Robert Mugabe does not believe in that cheap propaganda.
A cruel distortion of history.
While he sees the potential hand of Ian Smith and the likely complicity of the Zambian government – given Kenneth Kaunda’s antipathy towards ZANU and undiluted affinity for ZAPU – he is quite disparaging about the goings-on in ZANU’s Dare leading to Chitepo’s death.
He was quite fond of John Mataure – Dare’s Political Commissar – who Tongogara (Dare Secretary of Defence and ZANLA High Command’s Chief of defence) and other Dare leaders shamelessly acknowledge “was killed at the hands of ZANU” after the crushing of the Nhari Rebellion, and just before the assassination of Herbert Chitepo.
Mugabe says:
“How could they do that?
John Mataure was a good man – a committed freedom fighter.
He is the one I gave the party office keys when I left Tanzania for Rhodesia in 1963.
My information is that they asked William Ndangana to do the actual killing since he was also a Manyika like John.
This was supposed to demonstrate Ndangana's loyalty and absolve him of the Manyika conspiracy they were levelling against John Mataure and Herbert Chitepo.
It was terrible and unconscionable stuff.
The goings-on in Dare and the High Command in 1974 and 1975 were quite deplorable."
I must state that Mugabe’s position that Ndangana did the gruesome and despicable killing of John Mataure is disputed by Rugare Gumbo, ex-Dare ReChimurenga Information and Publicity Secretary (the only surviving Dare member).
In my conversation with him in August 2022, a visibly agitated Rugare Gumbo asserts that:
“No, that is not correct. It was Robson Manyika who did it.
William Ndangana had been one of those arrested by the Nhari rebels.
Mugabe blames Ndangana to shield and protect Robson Manyika – a fellow Zezuru.”
Indeed, 1974 and 1975 are really ugly years in the history of ZANU.
Unbridled ethnic conflict, internal strife and violence, unprecedented power struggles, and gruesome murder among revolutionary colleagues.
The Nhari Rebellion occurs in November 1974, during the liberation struggle, when ZANLA cadres in Chifombo, Zambia, rebel against ZANU’s Dare ReChimurenga (War Council) leadership and the ZANLA High Command.
The uprising is led by ZANLA Field Commanders Thomas Nhari and Dakarai Badza.
The uprising is viciously thwarted, and all the key participants and leaders are brutally executed.
In the trials conducted by ZANU’s Dare ReChimurenga after the Nhari Rebellion, the Political Commissar John Mataure is accused and convicted of collaborating with the rebels.
Various accounts of his execution indicate barbaric torture leading to a gruesome killing.
John Mataure died a terribly painful death.
In the same post-Nhari Rebellion reprisals, Herbert Chitepo, Dare’s Chairman, is pronounced by his colleagues to be a suspect with a curious caveat:
“However, there is not enough evidence at the moment.”
This Dare position on Herbert Chitepo's culpability is well-documented in the literature of that episode.
Nevertheless, when Chitepo is killed on 18 March 1975, ZANU’S Dare ReChimurenga and the ZANLA High Command deny any involvement.
Unsaid in Mugabe’s views and remarks about the circumstances leading to Herbert Chitepo’s death is the intelligent assessment that if you can kill your own party’s Political Commissar (John Mataure) and accept full responsibility for it, what will stop you from killing the party’s Chairman – Herbert Chitepo?
As indicated earlier, Josiah Tongogara (Dare Secretary of Defence and ZANLA High Command’s Chief of Defence) is widely quoted as saying:
“Yes, John Mataure – the Dare Political Commissar was killed at the hands of ZANU.”
How is the murder of the Political Commissar different from that of the Chairman?
Why is it OK to kill your party’s Political Commissar?
Is it a more acceptable crime?
Surely, if organisationally you find it sound, rational and proper to brutally eliminate the Political Commissar of your party, nothing can stop you from taking similar action against the Chairman.
Absolutely nothing!
Moreso, if he is: “Guilty, but no evidence at the moment.”
It is called common sense.
However, what I find most intriguing and revealing is that with all his views about the potential role of ZANU’s Dare ReChimurenga and the ZANLA High Command in the death of Chitepo, ZANU Secretary General Robert Mugabe goes on to, publicly (in 1975 and 1976) and opportunistically, totally absolve (without any shred of evidence) the ZANU Dare leadership and the ZANLA High Command who had been arrested over Chitepo’s death.
He brazenly blames Ian Smith and Kenneth Kaunda for the tragedy.
Of course, this is a Machiavellian masterstroke on Mugabe’s part!
Why?
Because the beleaguered (after having been illegally overthrown by his colleagues while in detention) ZANU President Ndabaningi Sithole – being both principled and naive – condemns the arrested Dare and High Command leaders.
He says:
“ Justice must take its course.
The detained leaders must be tried.”
In that one swift and calculated move alone, Mugabe gets the support of the entire detained Dare leadership and Tongogara’s High Command, while Ndabaningi loses the same folks.
Combining this spectacular feat by Mugabe with the October 1975 Mgagao declaration by ZANLA fighters who endorse him as their spokesperson, he is on his way to taking total and unquestionable control of the external ZANU wing, more specifically and importantly, the ZANLA forces.
Whoever controls the ZANLA forces is the ZANU leader.
Period.
Bona’s son’s ascendancy to the leadership of ZANU is now unstoppable!
Conversely, Ndabaningi Sithole’s fate is sealed!
The Dare and High Command leaders detained in Zambia (over Chitepo’s death) are thoroughly disappointed with Sithole.
They are totally disenchanted with him.
In particular, Tongogara is palpably furious and apoplectic with rage.
He says:
“I defended you (Sithole) when you were unprocedurally and fraudulently removed from the presidency of ZANU by Central Committee members in detention [in then Rhodesia].
We condemned and refused to recognise that foolish coup d’état engineered by Edgar Tekere and others.
Now, you are betraying me regarding Chitepo’s death.”
One of the detained ZANU Dare leaders, Information and Publicity Secretary Rugare Gumbo, who later falls out with Mugabe at two separate historical points, says to me:
“When we were detained in Zambia after the death of Chitepo, and Robert Mugabe supported us and blamed Smith and Kaunda for the murder, we said:
‘Now that is our leader.’
We immediately denounced Ndabaningi Sithole and embraced Mugabe.
Of course, we lived to regret it.
We had jumped the gun.
It was a monumental error.”
Rejoinder: Mnangagwa of November 2017 versus Mugabe of April 1980
With hindsight, it is not correct to say that in November 2017, the interests of the political elites (the rulers) coincided with those of the ruled (the ordinary folks).
The elites duped the people into supporting a coup d’état that had nothing to do with people.
The people thought – wrongly – that the departure of Robert Mugabe would signal a break with the past and a step into a new dispensation characterised by a democratic, prosperous and inclusive Zimbabwe.
Yes, people freely marched without coercion or enticement.
However, their agenda and that of the coup plotters were at cross purposes.
Put differently, the coup plotters missed an opportunity to embrace the people’s agenda and harness the global convergence of goodwill that characterised the country, continent and the globe, after the coup.
It was a huge missed opportunity.
The goodwill was shamefully squandered.
In fact, at a cynical level, if they had done that, their rulership could have been sustained while the country would be in better shape.
Lack of strategic thinking, crass, narrow, misplaced self-interest and outright absence of Machiavellian instincts were the order of the day.
Emmerson Mnangagwa miserably failed to utilise the coup d’état dividend to entrench himself effectively.
Indeed, after the coup, because of lack of strategic insight and foresight, Emmerson worked against his own self-interest.
Not to talk about the national interest.
Now, he is thoroughly discredited, gallivanting from one discredited election to the next.
And the country is in a mess!
It did not have to be this way.
Why did Emmerson not learn from his master and mentor?
Robert Mugabe, with all his faults, had better instincts after his victory in the 1980 elections.
He tried to harness the goodwill granted to the new nation by reaching out to Joshua Nkomo and Ian Smith.
Of course, this was short-lived, as Gukurahundi would soon follow.
It was downhill from there.
However, let us examine what he did after his ascendancy in 1980.
Tactically, he knew the Rhodesians could undermine him.
They still controlled the state infrastructure and instruments of violence in all respects.
His party had won but was inexperienced in statecraft.
They were vulnerable.
Although he had won outright – 57 out of 80 of the open parliamentary seats – he needed time to establish an administration and consolidate his grip on national power.
In our discussions at State House, Robert Mugabe clearly explained his intricate and nuanced manoeuvring to me:
“I had to proceed very carefully and strategically, indeed.
We invited our colleagues from ZAPU into government.
With Smith, I told him I wanted to include some of his people in my government.
He wanted to give me the names.
I said: ‘No, I will choose on my own from your people.’
Smith reluctantly agreed.
That is how we ended up with the likes of David Smith, Chris Anderson and Dennis Norman.
In fact, I continued with Ian Smith’s Chief Secretary to the Cabinet – Justice George Smith – for nearly five years.
I also kept Ian Smith’s Private Secretary – Constantine ‘Costa’ Pafitis – up to 1982.
Of course, we continued with all the Rhodesian security chiefs heading the Army, Police and CIO, including Peter Walls, Ken Flower and David ‘Dan’ Stannard.
Well, the Selous Scouts – those we immediately disbanded as an outfit.
More significantly, I would meet with Ian Smith on Monday before every Cabinet meeting which was held on Tuesday.
I did this every week.
I only stopped because Smith was now going around saying:
‘That Robert Mugabe knows nothing.
Every Monday, I give him all the ideas that he is implementing.’
Of course, I had to put an end to the Monday meetings with Ian Smith.
There you are.
So, yes, indeed, we tried to move with care in 1980.
Of course, we never trusted the Rhodesians.
I made them think that I trusted them. When we were good and ready, we got rid of them.
You know how we dealt with people like Peter Walls and others.”
So that is how a Machiavellian Mugabe played the game in 1980!
A cunning, strategic and astute poker player.
Robert Mugabe worked with his worst enemies to consolidate his grip on power and entrench himself.
If only Mnangagwa had 10 per cent of that political aptitude and sophistication in 2017, Zimbabwe would be a different place today.
Even his colleagues and supporters acknowledge Emmerson’s unmitigated folly.
ZANU-PF stalwart Tshinga Dube, in his autobiography released in November 2019, argues that Zimbabwe could have fared much better if Emmerson Mnangagwa had reached out to Morgan Tsvangirai, with a view to set up an inclusive transitional arrangement, soon after the coup d’état of November 2017:
“… If the MDC Alliance was brought closer when the new dispensation was ushered, we would today be in a different situation.
We would have emerged out of the woods and exited a life of perennial doom and gloom.
The lost opportunity has cost us immensely. We have without doubt retrogressed.”
Dube posits that Mnangagwa’s “bid to grab everything while leaving out the main opposition MDC that helped him camouflage to the world as a popular uprising, what had all the hallmarks of a coup, has backfired …”
This is a common-sense position that we have articulated elsewhere in this book.
However, it is refreshing to see the same views being regurgitated by ZANU-PF leaders.
This means that Mnangagwa's lack of strategic thinking, political acumen and governance gravitas is common cause even among his party members.
What a pity.
Zimbabwe deserves a better leader.
This is an excerpt from the book: In Search of the Elusive Zimbabwean Dream, Volume III (Ideas & Solutions)
By Professor Arthur G.O. Mutambara
Book Availability:
1) Most book stores (Harare, Bulawayo, Mutare)
2) Harare & Vic Falls Airports
3) Amazon (e-book and hardcopy in TWO PARTS)
4) SA +27832879091 5) UK +44 7934 117610
6) USA +1 469 777 2669/+1 215 699 4103/+1 678 491 6702
7) Book Fantastics website (Harare) 0779210403](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F_qdh1dXsAE4Iw_.jpg)
Olivia
Online
obey makumani
@aubeigh
Mining Engineer
Aspiring Entrepreneur
Joined January 2012
543 Following
113 Followers
163 Posts
Dear son @ShingaiMusasiwa
You are 21 yrs old. 4 yrs younger than when I had you. Here is what will happen over the next 26 years:
1) From the about 150 people you actually call your “homie” by my age you’d have buried about 20 of them. To accidents, sickness and self neglect.
2) You will not be in contact with 99% of those who remain. You will start to out grow or branch away from your circle rapidly.
3) You will regret every cent you wasted on alcohol and vapes. As you will be able to quantify 26yrs of waste. You will hate yourself for spending so much to impress people you don’t even like with shit you don’t even need.
4) The woman you think you love now , and spend the rest of your life with , will be gone and you won’t even talk. You may even have a child or 2. Or 3.
5) You won’t remember any of the fleeting sexual partners you sacrificed your soul, wealth or relationships for. You won’t even remember what they looked like.
6) You will look in the mirror and curse your younger self for every burger , kebab and junk food that got you type 2 diabetic and obese. You will wonder why you didn’t hit the gym and keep as fit as you were.
7) You will realise that money brings as many problems as it “solves”.
8) Everything you think matters today won’t matter at all. The sports team. The rapper. The hobby. TV shows. TikTok channels.
9) You won’t even know where your degree or A’level certificates are, or when you last saw them.
10) The more you are able to afford, the less things you actually want. You start doing things for everyone else and not yourself.
11) You will finally have the answer to the question “is there more to life”… and the answer will be NO.
——
None of these are written in stone and you can change a lot of these things NOW. After 25, habits become extremely hard to break.
Good night boy.
Who to follow
ZERA IS APPLAUDED FOR THIS. BUT WHY NOT JUST BAN THEM FOR ALL THE DAMAGE THEY CAUSE TO PEOPLE’S CARS?
1
Elima Fuels VID Eastlea, Harare
Selling contaminated blend.
Convicted and fined.
2
Knars Petroleum, Marondera
Selling water contaminated blend.
Convicted and fined.
3
Rubel Energy Mufakose, Harare
Selling contaminated diesel.
Convicted and fined.
4
AA Fuels Southerton, Harare
Selling contaminated blend.
Convicted and fined.
5
Elima Waterfalls, Harare
Selling contaminated blend and diesel.
Convicted and fined.
6
Elima Ruwa
Selling contaminated blend and diesel.
Convicted and fined.
Repeat offender.
License cancelled
Site closed.
7
Mt Meru Mbare, Harare
Selling water contaminated diesel.
Convicted and fined.
8
Busuman Motors Bulawayo
Selling contaminated diesel.
Convicted and fined.
9
All Oils Ardbennie, Harare
Selling water contaminated diesel.
Convicted and fined.
10
DA Motors Mutare
Selling contaminated diesel and blended petrol as unblended petrol.
Convicted and fined.
11
Flo Petroleum Masvingo
Selling contaminated blend.
Convicted and fined.
12
Pitstop Hatcliff. Harare
Robert Mugabe on Herbert Chitepo (and a Rejoinder on the Missed Opportunity of the 2017 Coup)
Book Excerpt from: In Search of the Elusive Zimbabwean Dream, Volume III (Ideas & Solutions)
By Professor Arthur G.O. Mutambara
In private discussions, Mugabe has immense respect for Herbert Chitepo – Zimbabwe’s first Black barrister (qualified in 1954), ZANU’s distinguished Chairman, a dedicated revolutionary and resolute freedom fighter – who was killed in Zambia on 18 March 1975.
He explains that the main reason he went to Ghana in 1957 was to work and raise money so that he could go to London and train as a lawyer like Chitepo.
Robert Mugabe says:
“Herbert Chitepo was my role model.”
Even when he returns from Ghana and joins the nationalists in 1960 (NDP), Mugabe is under the political tutelage of Herbert Chitepo.
I guess his narcissism and inflated ego would not allow him to publicly acknowledge Chitepo as a personal inspiration or potential mentor.
Of course, he wants to ride on the farcical fiction and myth cultivated by his ZANU-PF sycophants, propagandists and bootlickers that he is the alpha and omega of Zimbabwe’s liberation struggle.
Zimbabwe’s only founding father, a freedom fighter with neither peers nor equals.
It is as if Robert Mugabe was carrying two guns and fighting alone to liberate the country.
Shame!
Yet, by the end of the war in 1979, he could not even fire a pistol.
The only African leader Mugabe acknowledges publicly is Kwame Nkrumah.
“He was my inspirer,” he asserts on one occasion at a public event.
I guess Nkrumah is too distant from Zimbabwe’s liberation struggle to dent Mugabe’s unflinching and firm grip on its narrative.
The ZANU-PF functionaries (with Mugabe’s blessing) would want the country to believe that Chitepo wanted to be like Mugabe.
Quite the opposite!
Robert Mugabe was unworthy and unqualified to untie Herbert Chitepo’s shoes.
This, he confesses to me, without equivocation or ambiguity.
I also discover that, quite contrary to ZANU-PF’s inspired conventional wisdom, buttressed by his own public utterances, Mugabe does not share the view that the external ZANU’s Dare ReChimurenga (Revolutionary War Council) and the ZANLA High Command were completely innocent in the death of Herbert Chitepo.
Privately, Robert Mugabe does not believe in that cheap propaganda.
A cruel distortion of history.
While he sees the potential hand of Ian Smith and the likely complicity of the Zambian government – given Kenneth Kaunda’s antipathy towards ZANU and undiluted affinity for ZAPU – he is quite disparaging about the goings-on in ZANU’s Dare leading to Chitepo’s death.
He was quite fond of John Mataure – Dare’s Political Commissar – who Tongogara (Dare Secretary of Defence and ZANLA High Command’s Chief of defence) and other Dare leaders shamelessly acknowledge “was killed at the hands of ZANU” after the crushing of the Nhari Rebellion, and just before the assassination of Herbert Chitepo.
Mugabe says:
“How could they do that?
John Mataure was a good man – a committed freedom fighter.
He is the one I gave the party office keys when I left Tanzania for Rhodesia in 1963.
My information is that they asked William Ndangana to do the actual killing since he was also a Manyika like John.
This was supposed to demonstrate Ndangana's loyalty and absolve him of the Manyika conspiracy they were levelling against John Mataure and Herbert Chitepo.
It was terrible and unconscionable stuff.
The goings-on in Dare and the High Command in 1974 and 1975 were quite deplorable."
I must state that Mugabe’s position that Ndangana did the gruesome and despicable killing of John Mataure is disputed by Rugare Gumbo, ex-Dare ReChimurenga Information and Publicity Secretary (the only surviving Dare member).
In my conversation with him in August 2022, a visibly agitated Rugare Gumbo asserts that:
“No, that is not correct. It was Robson Manyika who did it.
William Ndangana had been one of those arrested by the Nhari rebels.
Mugabe blames Ndangana to shield and protect Robson Manyika – a fellow Zezuru.”
Indeed, 1974 and 1975 are really ugly years in the history of ZANU.
Unbridled ethnic conflict, internal strife and violence, unprecedented power struggles, and gruesome murder among revolutionary colleagues.
The Nhari Rebellion occurs in November 1974, during the liberation struggle, when ZANLA cadres in Chifombo, Zambia, rebel against ZANU’s Dare ReChimurenga (War Council) leadership and the ZANLA High Command.
The uprising is led by ZANLA Field Commanders Thomas Nhari and Dakarai Badza.
The uprising is viciously thwarted, and all the key participants and leaders are brutally executed.
In the trials conducted by ZANU’s Dare ReChimurenga after the Nhari Rebellion, the Political Commissar John Mataure is accused and convicted of collaborating with the rebels.
Various accounts of his execution indicate barbaric torture leading to a gruesome killing.
John Mataure died a terribly painful death.
In the same post-Nhari Rebellion reprisals, Herbert Chitepo, Dare’s Chairman, is pronounced by his colleagues to be a suspect with a curious caveat:
“However, there is not enough evidence at the moment.”
This Dare position on Herbert Chitepo's culpability is well-documented in the literature of that episode.
Nevertheless, when Chitepo is killed on 18 March 1975, ZANU’S Dare ReChimurenga and the ZANLA High Command deny any involvement.
Unsaid in Mugabe’s views and remarks about the circumstances leading to Herbert Chitepo’s death is the intelligent assessment that if you can kill your own party’s Political Commissar (John Mataure) and accept full responsibility for it, what will stop you from killing the party’s Chairman – Herbert Chitepo?
As indicated earlier, Josiah Tongogara (Dare Secretary of Defence and ZANLA High Command’s Chief of Defence) is widely quoted as saying:
“Yes, John Mataure – the Dare Political Commissar was killed at the hands of ZANU.”
How is the murder of the Political Commissar different from that of the Chairman?
Why is it OK to kill your party’s Political Commissar?
Is it a more acceptable crime?
Surely, if organisationally you find it sound, rational and proper to brutally eliminate the Political Commissar of your party, nothing can stop you from taking similar action against the Chairman.
Absolutely nothing!
Moreso, if he is: “Guilty, but no evidence at the moment.”
It is called common sense.
However, what I find most intriguing and revealing is that with all his views about the potential role of ZANU’s Dare ReChimurenga and the ZANLA High Command in the death of Chitepo, ZANU Secretary General Robert Mugabe goes on to, publicly (in 1975 and 1976) and opportunistically, totally absolve (without any shred of evidence) the ZANU Dare leadership and the ZANLA High Command who had been arrested over Chitepo’s death.
He brazenly blames Ian Smith and Kenneth Kaunda for the tragedy.
Of course, this is a Machiavellian masterstroke on Mugabe’s part!
Why?
Because the beleaguered (after having been illegally overthrown by his colleagues while in detention) ZANU President Ndabaningi Sithole – being both principled and naive – condemns the arrested Dare and High Command leaders.
He says:
“ Justice must take its course.
The detained leaders must be tried.”
In that one swift and calculated move alone, Mugabe gets the support of the entire detained Dare leadership and Tongogara’s High Command, while Ndabaningi loses the same folks.
Combining this spectacular feat by Mugabe with the October 1975 Mgagao declaration by ZANLA fighters who endorse him as their spokesperson, he is on his way to taking total and unquestionable control of the external ZANU wing, more specifically and importantly, the ZANLA forces.
Whoever controls the ZANLA forces is the ZANU leader.
Period.
Bona’s son’s ascendancy to the leadership of ZANU is now unstoppable!
Conversely, Ndabaningi Sithole’s fate is sealed!
The Dare and High Command leaders detained in Zambia (over Chitepo’s death) are thoroughly disappointed with Sithole.
They are totally disenchanted with him.
In particular, Tongogara is palpably furious and apoplectic with rage.
He says:
“I defended you (Sithole) when you were unprocedurally and fraudulently removed from the presidency of ZANU by Central Committee members in detention [in then Rhodesia].
We condemned and refused to recognise that foolish coup d’état engineered by Edgar Tekere and others.
Now, you are betraying me regarding Chitepo’s death.”
One of the detained ZANU Dare leaders, Information and Publicity Secretary Rugare Gumbo, who later falls out with Mugabe at two separate historical points, says to me:
“When we were detained in Zambia after the death of Chitepo, and Robert Mugabe supported us and blamed Smith and Kaunda for the murder, we said:
‘Now that is our leader.’
We immediately denounced Ndabaningi Sithole and embraced Mugabe.
Of course, we lived to regret it.
We had jumped the gun.
It was a monumental error.”
Rejoinder: Mnangagwa of November 2017 versus Mugabe of April 1980
With hindsight, it is not correct to say that in November 2017, the interests of the political elites (the rulers) coincided with those of the ruled (the ordinary folks).
The elites duped the people into supporting a coup d’état that had nothing to do with people.
The people thought – wrongly – that the departure of Robert Mugabe would signal a break with the past and a step into a new dispensation characterised by a democratic, prosperous and inclusive Zimbabwe.
Yes, people freely marched without coercion or enticement.
However, their agenda and that of the coup plotters were at cross purposes.
Put differently, the coup plotters missed an opportunity to embrace the people’s agenda and harness the global convergence of goodwill that characterised the country, continent and the globe, after the coup.
It was a huge missed opportunity.
The goodwill was shamefully squandered.
In fact, at a cynical level, if they had done that, their rulership could have been sustained while the country would be in better shape.
Lack of strategic thinking, crass, narrow, misplaced self-interest and outright absence of Machiavellian instincts were the order of the day.
Emmerson Mnangagwa miserably failed to utilise the coup d’état dividend to entrench himself effectively.
Indeed, after the coup, because of lack of strategic insight and foresight, Emmerson worked against his own self-interest.
Not to talk about the national interest.
Now, he is thoroughly discredited, gallivanting from one discredited election to the next.
And the country is in a mess!
It did not have to be this way.
Why did Emmerson not learn from his master and mentor?
Robert Mugabe, with all his faults, had better instincts after his victory in the 1980 elections.
He tried to harness the goodwill granted to the new nation by reaching out to Joshua Nkomo and Ian Smith.
Of course, this was short-lived, as Gukurahundi would soon follow.
It was downhill from there.
However, let us examine what he did after his ascendancy in 1980.
Tactically, he knew the Rhodesians could undermine him.
They still controlled the state infrastructure and instruments of violence in all respects.
His party had won but was inexperienced in statecraft.
They were vulnerable.
Although he had won outright – 57 out of 80 of the open parliamentary seats – he needed time to establish an administration and consolidate his grip on national power.
In our discussions at State House, Robert Mugabe clearly explained his intricate and nuanced manoeuvring to me:
“I had to proceed very carefully and strategically, indeed.
We invited our colleagues from ZAPU into government.
With Smith, I told him I wanted to include some of his people in my government.
He wanted to give me the names.
I said: ‘No, I will choose on my own from your people.’
Smith reluctantly agreed.
That is how we ended up with the likes of David Smith, Chris Anderson and Dennis Norman.
In fact, I continued with Ian Smith’s Chief Secretary to the Cabinet – Justice George Smith – for nearly five years.
I also kept Ian Smith’s Private Secretary – Constantine ‘Costa’ Pafitis – up to 1982.
Of course, we continued with all the Rhodesian security chiefs heading the Army, Police and CIO, including Peter Walls, Ken Flower and David ‘Dan’ Stannard.
Well, the Selous Scouts – those we immediately disbanded as an outfit.
More significantly, I would meet with Ian Smith on Monday before every Cabinet meeting which was held on Tuesday.
I did this every week.
I only stopped because Smith was now going around saying:
‘That Robert Mugabe knows nothing.
Every Monday, I give him all the ideas that he is implementing.’
Of course, I had to put an end to the Monday meetings with Ian Smith.
There you are.
So, yes, indeed, we tried to move with care in 1980.
Of course, we never trusted the Rhodesians.
I made them think that I trusted them. When we were good and ready, we got rid of them.
You know how we dealt with people like Peter Walls and others.”
So that is how a Machiavellian Mugabe played the game in 1980!
A cunning, strategic and astute poker player.
Robert Mugabe worked with his worst enemies to consolidate his grip on power and entrench himself.
If only Mnangagwa had 10 per cent of that political aptitude and sophistication in 2017, Zimbabwe would be a different place today.
Even his colleagues and supporters acknowledge Emmerson’s unmitigated folly.
ZANU-PF stalwart Tshinga Dube, in his autobiography released in November 2019, argues that Zimbabwe could have fared much better if Emmerson Mnangagwa had reached out to Morgan Tsvangirai, with a view to set up an inclusive transitional arrangement, soon after the coup d’état of November 2017:
“… If the MDC Alliance was brought closer when the new dispensation was ushered, we would today be in a different situation.
We would have emerged out of the woods and exited a life of perennial doom and gloom.
The lost opportunity has cost us immensely. We have without doubt retrogressed.”
Dube posits that Mnangagwa’s “bid to grab everything while leaving out the main opposition MDC that helped him camouflage to the world as a popular uprising, what had all the hallmarks of a coup, has backfired …”
This is a common-sense position that we have articulated elsewhere in this book.
However, it is refreshing to see the same views being regurgitated by ZANU-PF leaders.
This means that Mnangagwa's lack of strategic thinking, political acumen and governance gravitas is common cause even among his party members.
What a pity.
Zimbabwe deserves a better leader.
This is an excerpt from the book: In Search of the Elusive Zimbabwean Dream, Volume III (Ideas & Solutions)
By Professor Arthur G.O. Mutambara
Book Availability:
1) Most book stores (Harare, Bulawayo, Mutare)
2) Harare & Vic Falls Airports
3) Amazon (e-book and hardcopy in TWO PARTS)
4) SA +27832879091 5) UK +44 7934 117610
6) USA +1 469 777 2669/+1 215 699 4103/+1 678 491 6702
7) Book Fantastics website (Harare) 0779210403
![amutambara's tweet photo. Robert Mugabe on Herbert Chitepo (and a Rejoinder on the Missed Opportunity of the 2017 Coup)
Book Excerpt from: In Search of the Elusive Zimbabwean Dream, Volume III (Ideas & Solutions)
By Professor Arthur G.O. Mutambara
In private discussions, Mugabe has immense respect for Herbert Chitepo – Zimbabwe’s first Black barrister (qualified in 1954), ZANU’s distinguished Chairman, a dedicated revolutionary and resolute freedom fighter – who was killed in Zambia on 18 March 1975.
He explains that the main reason he went to Ghana in 1957 was to work and raise money so that he could go to London and train as a lawyer like Chitepo.
Robert Mugabe says:
“Herbert Chitepo was my role model.”
Even when he returns from Ghana and joins the nationalists in 1960 (NDP), Mugabe is under the political tutelage of Herbert Chitepo.
I guess his narcissism and inflated ego would not allow him to publicly acknowledge Chitepo as a personal inspiration or potential mentor.
Of course, he wants to ride on the farcical fiction and myth cultivated by his ZANU-PF sycophants, propagandists and bootlickers that he is the alpha and omega of Zimbabwe’s liberation struggle.
Zimbabwe’s only founding father, a freedom fighter with neither peers nor equals.
It is as if Robert Mugabe was carrying two guns and fighting alone to liberate the country.
Shame!
Yet, by the end of the war in 1979, he could not even fire a pistol.
The only African leader Mugabe acknowledges publicly is Kwame Nkrumah.
“He was my inspirer,” he asserts on one occasion at a public event.
I guess Nkrumah is too distant from Zimbabwe’s liberation struggle to dent Mugabe’s unflinching and firm grip on its narrative.
The ZANU-PF functionaries (with Mugabe’s blessing) would want the country to believe that Chitepo wanted to be like Mugabe.
Quite the opposite!
Robert Mugabe was unworthy and unqualified to untie Herbert Chitepo’s shoes.
This, he confesses to me, without equivocation or ambiguity.
I also discover that, quite contrary to ZANU-PF’s inspired conventional wisdom, buttressed by his own public utterances, Mugabe does not share the view that the external ZANU’s Dare ReChimurenga (Revolutionary War Council) and the ZANLA High Command were completely innocent in the death of Herbert Chitepo.
Privately, Robert Mugabe does not believe in that cheap propaganda.
A cruel distortion of history.
While he sees the potential hand of Ian Smith and the likely complicity of the Zambian government – given Kenneth Kaunda’s antipathy towards ZANU and undiluted affinity for ZAPU – he is quite disparaging about the goings-on in ZANU’s Dare leading to Chitepo’s death.
He was quite fond of John Mataure – Dare’s Political Commissar – who Tongogara (Dare Secretary of Defence and ZANLA High Command’s Chief of defence) and other Dare leaders shamelessly acknowledge “was killed at the hands of ZANU” after the crushing of the Nhari Rebellion, and just before the assassination of Herbert Chitepo.
Mugabe says:
“How could they do that?
John Mataure was a good man – a committed freedom fighter.
He is the one I gave the party office keys when I left Tanzania for Rhodesia in 1963.
My information is that they asked William Ndangana to do the actual killing since he was also a Manyika like John.
This was supposed to demonstrate Ndangana's loyalty and absolve him of the Manyika conspiracy they were levelling against John Mataure and Herbert Chitepo.
It was terrible and unconscionable stuff.
The goings-on in Dare and the High Command in 1974 and 1975 were quite deplorable."
I must state that Mugabe’s position that Ndangana did the gruesome and despicable killing of John Mataure is disputed by Rugare Gumbo, ex-Dare ReChimurenga Information and Publicity Secretary (the only surviving Dare member).
In my conversation with him in August 2022, a visibly agitated Rugare Gumbo asserts that:
“No, that is not correct. It was Robson Manyika who did it.
William Ndangana had been one of those arrested by the Nhari rebels.
Mugabe blames Ndangana to shield and protect Robson Manyika – a fellow Zezuru.”
Indeed, 1974 and 1975 are really ugly years in the history of ZANU.
Unbridled ethnic conflict, internal strife and violence, unprecedented power struggles, and gruesome murder among revolutionary colleagues.
The Nhari Rebellion occurs in November 1974, during the liberation struggle, when ZANLA cadres in Chifombo, Zambia, rebel against ZANU’s Dare ReChimurenga (War Council) leadership and the ZANLA High Command.
The uprising is led by ZANLA Field Commanders Thomas Nhari and Dakarai Badza.
The uprising is viciously thwarted, and all the key participants and leaders are brutally executed.
In the trials conducted by ZANU’s Dare ReChimurenga after the Nhari Rebellion, the Political Commissar John Mataure is accused and convicted of collaborating with the rebels.
Various accounts of his execution indicate barbaric torture leading to a gruesome killing.
John Mataure died a terribly painful death.
In the same post-Nhari Rebellion reprisals, Herbert Chitepo, Dare’s Chairman, is pronounced by his colleagues to be a suspect with a curious caveat:
“However, there is not enough evidence at the moment.”
This Dare position on Herbert Chitepo's culpability is well-documented in the literature of that episode.
Nevertheless, when Chitepo is killed on 18 March 1975, ZANU’S Dare ReChimurenga and the ZANLA High Command deny any involvement.
Unsaid in Mugabe’s views and remarks about the circumstances leading to Herbert Chitepo’s death is the intelligent assessment that if you can kill your own party’s Political Commissar (John Mataure) and accept full responsibility for it, what will stop you from killing the party’s Chairman – Herbert Chitepo?
As indicated earlier, Josiah Tongogara (Dare Secretary of Defence and ZANLA High Command’s Chief of Defence) is widely quoted as saying:
“Yes, John Mataure – the Dare Political Commissar was killed at the hands of ZANU.”
How is the murder of the Political Commissar different from that of the Chairman?
Why is it OK to kill your party’s Political Commissar?
Is it a more acceptable crime?
Surely, if organisationally you find it sound, rational and proper to brutally eliminate the Political Commissar of your party, nothing can stop you from taking similar action against the Chairman.
Absolutely nothing!
Moreso, if he is: “Guilty, but no evidence at the moment.”
It is called common sense.
However, what I find most intriguing and revealing is that with all his views about the potential role of ZANU’s Dare ReChimurenga and the ZANLA High Command in the death of Chitepo, ZANU Secretary General Robert Mugabe goes on to, publicly (in 1975 and 1976) and opportunistically, totally absolve (without any shred of evidence) the ZANU Dare leadership and the ZANLA High Command who had been arrested over Chitepo’s death.
He brazenly blames Ian Smith and Kenneth Kaunda for the tragedy.
Of course, this is a Machiavellian masterstroke on Mugabe’s part!
Why?
Because the beleaguered (after having been illegally overthrown by his colleagues while in detention) ZANU President Ndabaningi Sithole – being both principled and naive – condemns the arrested Dare and High Command leaders.
He says:
“ Justice must take its course.
The detained leaders must be tried.”
In that one swift and calculated move alone, Mugabe gets the support of the entire detained Dare leadership and Tongogara’s High Command, while Ndabaningi loses the same folks.
Combining this spectacular feat by Mugabe with the October 1975 Mgagao declaration by ZANLA fighters who endorse him as their spokesperson, he is on his way to taking total and unquestionable control of the external ZANU wing, more specifically and importantly, the ZANLA forces.
Whoever controls the ZANLA forces is the ZANU leader.
Period.
Bona’s son’s ascendancy to the leadership of ZANU is now unstoppable!
Conversely, Ndabaningi Sithole’s fate is sealed!
The Dare and High Command leaders detained in Zambia (over Chitepo’s death) are thoroughly disappointed with Sithole.
They are totally disenchanted with him.
In particular, Tongogara is palpably furious and apoplectic with rage.
He says:
“I defended you (Sithole) when you were unprocedurally and fraudulently removed from the presidency of ZANU by Central Committee members in detention [in then Rhodesia].
We condemned and refused to recognise that foolish coup d’état engineered by Edgar Tekere and others.
Now, you are betraying me regarding Chitepo’s death.”
One of the detained ZANU Dare leaders, Information and Publicity Secretary Rugare Gumbo, who later falls out with Mugabe at two separate historical points, says to me:
“When we were detained in Zambia after the death of Chitepo, and Robert Mugabe supported us and blamed Smith and Kaunda for the murder, we said:
‘Now that is our leader.’
We immediately denounced Ndabaningi Sithole and embraced Mugabe.
Of course, we lived to regret it.
We had jumped the gun.
It was a monumental error.”
Rejoinder: Mnangagwa of November 2017 versus Mugabe of April 1980
With hindsight, it is not correct to say that in November 2017, the interests of the political elites (the rulers) coincided with those of the ruled (the ordinary folks).
The elites duped the people into supporting a coup d’état that had nothing to do with people.
The people thought – wrongly – that the departure of Robert Mugabe would signal a break with the past and a step into a new dispensation characterised by a democratic, prosperous and inclusive Zimbabwe.
Yes, people freely marched without coercion or enticement.
However, their agenda and that of the coup plotters were at cross purposes.
Put differently, the coup plotters missed an opportunity to embrace the people’s agenda and harness the global convergence of goodwill that characterised the country, continent and the globe, after the coup.
It was a huge missed opportunity.
The goodwill was shamefully squandered.
In fact, at a cynical level, if they had done that, their rulership could have been sustained while the country would be in better shape.
Lack of strategic thinking, crass, narrow, misplaced self-interest and outright absence of Machiavellian instincts were the order of the day.
Emmerson Mnangagwa miserably failed to utilise the coup d’état dividend to entrench himself effectively.
Indeed, after the coup, because of lack of strategic insight and foresight, Emmerson worked against his own self-interest.
Not to talk about the national interest.
Now, he is thoroughly discredited, gallivanting from one discredited election to the next.
And the country is in a mess!
It did not have to be this way.
Why did Emmerson not learn from his master and mentor?
Robert Mugabe, with all his faults, had better instincts after his victory in the 1980 elections.
He tried to harness the goodwill granted to the new nation by reaching out to Joshua Nkomo and Ian Smith.
Of course, this was short-lived, as Gukurahundi would soon follow.
It was downhill from there.
However, let us examine what he did after his ascendancy in 1980.
Tactically, he knew the Rhodesians could undermine him.
They still controlled the state infrastructure and instruments of violence in all respects.
His party had won but was inexperienced in statecraft.
They were vulnerable.
Although he had won outright – 57 out of 80 of the open parliamentary seats – he needed time to establish an administration and consolidate his grip on national power.
In our discussions at State House, Robert Mugabe clearly explained his intricate and nuanced manoeuvring to me:
“I had to proceed very carefully and strategically, indeed.
We invited our colleagues from ZAPU into government.
With Smith, I told him I wanted to include some of his people in my government.
He wanted to give me the names.
I said: ‘No, I will choose on my own from your people.’
Smith reluctantly agreed.
That is how we ended up with the likes of David Smith, Chris Anderson and Dennis Norman.
In fact, I continued with Ian Smith’s Chief Secretary to the Cabinet – Justice George Smith – for nearly five years.
I also kept Ian Smith’s Private Secretary – Constantine ‘Costa’ Pafitis – up to 1982.
Of course, we continued with all the Rhodesian security chiefs heading the Army, Police and CIO, including Peter Walls, Ken Flower and David ‘Dan’ Stannard.
Well, the Selous Scouts – those we immediately disbanded as an outfit.
More significantly, I would meet with Ian Smith on Monday before every Cabinet meeting which was held on Tuesday.
I did this every week.
I only stopped because Smith was now going around saying:
‘That Robert Mugabe knows nothing.
Every Monday, I give him all the ideas that he is implementing.’
Of course, I had to put an end to the Monday meetings with Ian Smith.
There you are.
So, yes, indeed, we tried to move with care in 1980.
Of course, we never trusted the Rhodesians.
I made them think that I trusted them. When we were good and ready, we got rid of them.
You know how we dealt with people like Peter Walls and others.”
So that is how a Machiavellian Mugabe played the game in 1980!
A cunning, strategic and astute poker player.
Robert Mugabe worked with his worst enemies to consolidate his grip on power and entrench himself.
If only Mnangagwa had 10 per cent of that political aptitude and sophistication in 2017, Zimbabwe would be a different place today.
Even his colleagues and supporters acknowledge Emmerson’s unmitigated folly.
ZANU-PF stalwart Tshinga Dube, in his autobiography released in November 2019, argues that Zimbabwe could have fared much better if Emmerson Mnangagwa had reached out to Morgan Tsvangirai, with a view to set up an inclusive transitional arrangement, soon after the coup d’état of November 2017:
“… If the MDC Alliance was brought closer when the new dispensation was ushered, we would today be in a different situation.
We would have emerged out of the woods and exited a life of perennial doom and gloom.
The lost opportunity has cost us immensely. We have without doubt retrogressed.”
Dube posits that Mnangagwa’s “bid to grab everything while leaving out the main opposition MDC that helped him camouflage to the world as a popular uprising, what had all the hallmarks of a coup, has backfired …”
This is a common-sense position that we have articulated elsewhere in this book.
However, it is refreshing to see the same views being regurgitated by ZANU-PF leaders.
This means that Mnangagwa's lack of strategic thinking, political acumen and governance gravitas is common cause even among his party members.
What a pity.
Zimbabwe deserves a better leader.
This is an excerpt from the book: In Search of the Elusive Zimbabwean Dream, Volume III (Ideas & Solutions)
By Professor Arthur G.O. Mutambara
Book Availability:
1) Most book stores (Harare, Bulawayo, Mutare)
2) Harare & Vic Falls Airports
3) Amazon (e-book and hardcopy in TWO PARTS)
4) SA +27832879091 5) UK +44 7934 117610
6) USA +1 469 777 2669/+1 215 699 4103/+1 678 491 6702
7) Book Fantastics website (Harare) 0779210403](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F_qdh1gXgAA-10h.jpg)
1/24 OK's results are out, and they are not pretty.
OK blames the environment & competition from informal traders.
But maybe there is another a hidden issue that has been a blind spot for OK for over 10 years — Capital Allocation.
A thread🧵 with background & analysis.
@ProfJNMoyo @CCCZimbabwe Why attack @ProfJNMoyo when he's just stating the facts. Political players @CCCZimbabwe need to know that some announcements may cause unnecessary anxiety amongst the general public.
“Tobacco crop record shattered as land reform bears fruit,” @HeraldZimbabwe 15 June 2023
“Zimbabwe’s historic Land Reform Programme has finally confounded its fiercest critics and detractors after proving its success with the country producing a record tobacco crop in 198 years, with 85 percent of it coming from smallholder farmers of whom 60 percent are beneficiaries of the now highly viable programme.
This comes barely a year after Zimbabwe realised a record wheat harvest since the crop started being produced commercially in the country in 1966.
While detractors projected failure of the fast-track Land Reform Programme at its inception in 2000, Zimbabwe has turned the tables on the pessimists, saving up to US$300 million in import costs following a record wheat harvest last year of over 375 000 tonnes.” reports today's Herald
This is a beautiful story.
Our land is our prosperity because land is the economy, and the economy is land!
https://t.co/8whqTl16jU
1. Why 🌎International Companies Like Standard Chartered Exit Markets Like #Zimbabwe🇿🇼
Standard Chartered Zimbabwe was a profitable bank that had been in Zim for over 130 years. A week ago, they exited Zimbabwe. Why?
Thread + V11s👇🏾#StanChart #FBC
ADHOC MONETARY POLICY COMMITTEE
1) The Monetary Policy Committee is holding an ad hoc Monetary Policy Committee meeting today
2)@KMutisi we expect the following issues to be discussed;
a) Interest rate policy
b) Exchange rate policy
c) Other measures to support…..
Before and after
Face lift to 2022 hilux
New wheels , snokel ,feynlab ceramic coating , full detailing
Random facts 🧵
1/ Strive Masiyiwa turned 62 yesterday.
Unknown to many, Strive was one of the earliest indigenization activists in Zimbabwe. He also made millions of dollars from GVT tenders - he qualifies as what we wld today call a tenderpreneur.
1. Dear newly minted A'Level graduates. You are going to college - congrats! Here are my thoughts based on experience & observations. You're probably going to study something that you never planned to because our education system is a pipe. Your points determine where you land...
Learn how to value a stock with the following ratios:
-The Price to book ratio (P/B
-Return on Equity (ROE)
-Debt to Equity ratio (D/E)
-Price to Sales Ratio (P/S)
-Earnings Per Share (EPS)
-Price to Earnings ratio (P/E)
//THREAD
Focus on Lithium Mining in Zimbabwe
@Mining_Zimbabwe
FACTS ONLY
1/
1. Bikita Lithium Mine, has been in existence since 1950, currently the biggest lithium producer in Zimbabwe & is owned by China’s Sinomine Resource Group. Acquired it for US$180 million.
Retweet if you know this book
Last Seen Users on Sotwe
EŞİM SEDA 
Seen from Turkey
أفلام سكس +18 مترجم
Seen from Oman
الزب العراقي
Bakekok123
Seen from Indonesia
Erotic 🤤 Girl 😜
Seen from Turkey
UTA College of Education
Seen from United Arab Emirates
người lớn tuổi
Seen from Vietnam
แอบแซ่บผัว-เมียชาวบ้าน
Seen from Thailand
alterpinay
Seen from Philippines
ThePhantom202 (Boss)
Seen from Korea
Trends for you
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
241.6M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
114.1M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.8M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107.2M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
98.7M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.4M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
91.8M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
89.8M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
83.8M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
75.3M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
73.1M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
70.8M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.8M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
66.1M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
65M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
62.9M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.3M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.8M followers
X
@x
60.7M followers