@stevebetteridg6@SydneyYIMBY The argument that one approval decision can’t solve a housing crisis across a nation of 27 million people is the dictionary definition of a flimsy argument
@stevebetteridg6@SydneyYIMBY Your argument consists of the following: “I don’t want more housing in haberfield”. Do you say that argument is anything other than flimsy and if so how?
@trustyriffs @SydneyYIMBY Honestly I have no idea but she doesn’t need to - housing affordability is not a hannerfield issue and the home owners of haberfield do not have ownership of the suburb. She lives in Sydney it’s her city too
@JeromeFahrer@hughriminton@FinancialReview Yes Jerome the interpretation of the data is that all allied health workers including jobs like pharmacists, sonographers, optometrists, podiatrists, paramedics and psychologists all work for the ndis… it’s a patently false assumption and a very silly/irresponsible article
@sbxr The data is very incorrect - it assumes that all allied health workers (which include jobs like pharmacists, paramedics, sonographers, optometrists, psychologists) work in the NDIS, which is patently incorrect.
@BeijingDai Wild theory that nato will barge into this war when they haven’t for years and have said they won’t consistently from the beginning and do to so would likely start WW3 but ok