@UKLabour Andy is just spending money. He needs to be at the centre of rape gangs to keep his involvement on the ground. It’s going pear shaped already.
@Nigel_Farage Our laws need to be amended so that execution is required. Most of all it saves huge amount of money which our country can little afford. So much energy today discussing it which would never have happened.
@aquitainexox It never worked with Brussels moving every few weeks to Strasbourg to keep a few restaurants happy. He needs to close to Manchester as he is deeply involved in the cover up of grooming gangs @MaggieOliverUK
@WasAcop Businesses should be able to take robust action like shooting them. This would then stop as there would be a consequence to actions. Guess that makes me right wing.
@Rachelhalliwel5@NatalieFleetMP Another victim and you voted against an enquiry. Events of recent days have led me to question your ability to be an MP. Why did you not have the courage to vote for something you clearly believe in ?
@LucyTCWife They are all sheep Lucy. No officer has a back bone these days and those that did have had it removed by @CollegeofPolice It needs officers to simply refuse orders from above and tell management to rock on and comply with political requests themselves or simply refuse themselves
@davidjcraig@PolitlcsUK@Fox_Claire Voting against an enquiry into grooming gangs whilst being a victim yourself tells me it’s all about her . She didn’t have the capacity to stand up and support others who suffered like she had. Where’s the character here David ?
@PolitlcsUK She voted against an enquiry into the rape of 10s thousands of her own voters daughters even having been a victim herself of such evil in her youth. @NatalieFleetMP I am surprised that that act alone didnot trigger you.
Angela Rayner didn’t just underpay roughly £40,000 of stamp duty on her Hove flat and breach the ministerial code – she then pocketed a £16,876 “golden goodbye” for resigning over it, funded entirely by the taxpayers she short-changed.
Now Andy Burnham has simply reinstated her as Housing Secretary, same department, same brief, same salary, as if nothing happened – while she keeps the cash for a job she’s now doing again.
Ministers are supposed to get severance if they leave office – Rayner turned it into a revolving-door bonus: resign in “disgrace”, bank 25% of your ministerial salary, then stroll back in with your mate in No10.
If this were any other workplace, it would be called what it is: taking money under false pretences. Why should families who pay every penny of their tax bill fund a redundancy payment for a minister who wasn’t actually made redundant?