@v4lentyna_@Neoncaffeine@BreadTheEnd no matter your genetics if you burn more than you consume you will lose weight, and if you consume more than you burn you will gain it, all of these "i barely eat and i exercise yet i don't lose weight/i eat so much and move so little yet im lean" are mostly incorrect tracking
@Tuna_Fent@fleckofsun@MoronMining uhm, no, Aristotle explained objective morality at a time when the Christian God as a concept didn't even exist through teleology
@YamnayaPotStonr@goofyballs67695 because socialization theory is postmodernist rhetorical babble, most behavioral patterns have a biological predisposition to them and interests and OCEAN traits do change from culture to culture but not in the way that supports the socialization theory
<CATGIRL IS... LE CRITICISM
<CATGIRL IS... LE SUBVERSIVE
<CATGIRL IS... LE ADDICTION METAPHOR
You are a fucking retarded faggot if you think it was made for anyone except the reddit trannies who belly laugh at these images
@ncrofiledaughtr you're just doing denialism, motivated scepticism, and an argumentum ad incredulitatem, you didn't even actually say anything, just "I, I, I" and "probably, probably, probably" and assumed stupidity to prove a point
@ncrofiledaughtr no one in this whole discussion once mentioned a pedophilic disorder except you, you're just assuming that researchers are stupid to make a point (without engaging in their literature). in every study they clarify what methodology was present and what definitions they used for it
@ncrofiledaughtr https://t.co/WOlGQDBbqJ I already clarified what clinical pedophilia means in sexology terms, I never once mentioned anything about a pedophilic disorder, stop being intentionally dense and start engaging with an actual argument. now the details are clarified
@ncrofiledaughtr >"clinical pedophilia" is poorly defined
"clinical" in this context means "methodology includes clinical assessment" like phalloplethysmography, IAT, fMRI, ERP, etc. instead of relying on self reports and psychometry and I can't think of a more objective method than this
@ncrofiledaughtr "He might be estimating % of men with pedophilic disorder" no he estimated % of men with pedophilia at around 3-5% and with a pedophilic disorder at around 1~%. engage with the subject instead of doing motivated scepticism, sexologists already account for these variables...
@ncrofiledaughtr okay, thanks for clarifying. it's worth to question information but you're doing too much here, DSM-5 definition is widely criticized and flawed and that's why M. Seto (to whose works I'm referring to) doesn't use it, stop making assumptions without engaging with his literature
@ncrofiledaughtr this is the standard for these researches, how can you select a sample for men with a pedophilic disorder if you didn't do a clinical assessment for it yet. it typically goes like: convicted CSO sample => post-hoc clinical assessment => % meeting pedophilia criteria
@ncrofiledaughtr >And I do believe the sample was probably selected for pedophilic disorder...
are you retarded? the sample consists of males convicted of child sexual offenses with a victim under the age of 14 and after the sample and control group were assembled a clinical assessment was done
@ncrofiledaughtr https://t.co/8Ly1eJaCZ6 additionally to this point, I did research and CSO+P have higher sex.recidivism rates than CSO-P and general SO but lower antisocial traits/general,non-sexual criminal versatility than SO and CSO-P. CSO+P don't have a marginalized group crime pattern👍
@ncrofiledaughtr >It doesn't though, circumstances do.
you sound ridiculous, be specific and name me those circumstances that make pedophiles *specifically* rape children while also commit any other crime at the same rate as the general population
@ncrofiledaughtr >It doesn't though, circumstances do.
you sound ridiculous, be specific and name me those circumstances that make pedophiles *specifically* rape children while also commit any other crime at the same rate as the general population
@ncrofiledaughtr >It's like bringing up crime rates for any marginalised group and acting like it means they're inherently more likely to commit them
itd be fair, frequency of certain alleles differs from an ethnic group to an ethnic group if you're hinting at it, its not what we're talking abt
@ncrofiledaughtr repeating the same thing over and over again won't make it true, either cite me a reliable study that shows that % of pedophiles in the general population and % of pedophiles among men who committed CSO are the same or stop dripping on my nerves
@ncrofiledaughtr >I just don't really trust these figures. I don't believe all of these people were really pedophiles. I don't believe every case I was genuinely abusive.
too bad buddy that's an argumentum ad incredulitatem, again, "I, I, I" instead of providing an actual substantial data
@ncrofiledaughtr I've read this whole thread very carefully and I can't help but notice how much you use "I think, I do believe, I don't believe, I would say" instead of "here's a X study that shows Y, and here's why the methodology is unreliable...", pure epistemological solipsism
@ncrofiledaughtr >a very large portion of the population are pedophiles with no "disorder"
okay, what % of the general population are pedophiles and what methodology did you use while accounting for these numbers