@JDudlicek@LostMyHats After all there were innocents on board, so according to the NAP, if you are being consistent, the answer would be ‘no’.
What I’m arguing, fundamentally, is your philosophy lacks sophistication, it’s two dimensional, and will therefore fall apart into absurdity.
@JDudlicek@LostMyHats It’s the same argument BLM activists give “well are you against racism” well yes, but that doesn’t say anything because it’s nested in a hierarchy of values.
So, to libertarians like you I always pose the question: given the knowledge, would you have shot down the planes on 9/11
@JDudlicek@LostMyHats Because it’s first, and not only that, the whole religion stands on those verses, they are the cornerstone of the covenants belief. So you can reject them all you want, but that’s a rejection of the covenant, which, outside of leaving you with diddly squat, means your also…
@MatthewHuntII@AP4Liberty This framing is not accurate, the system has flaws, some significant, that need to be addressed. However, when you embrace ‘failure’ as the lens you open up Pandora’s box to a series of possibilities that you will not like.
@BravoTitan9@doncsimpson26@triman4life@DefiyantlyFree But it’s very questionable whether Netanyahu actually believed that rationale! It’s far more likely it was a political answer than a policy one.
The irony however is this, the position you are advocating for of far more in line with the hard right in Israel, like Ben-Gvir.
@Mosislak1@YZenesh@MarioNawfal You’re not in a position to dictate morality commie, you have more blood on your hands then anyone in the literal history of world.
@Mosislak1@YZenesh@MarioNawfal You are literally a commie, crying crocodile tears over a conflict while your ideology is responsible for 150 million + deaths is not the flex you think it is.