Do you know why they want Gyanesh Kumar to 'resign'?
Why not 'remove' him - if he has done wrong.
That is the process driven and constitutional way.
Because it would require numbers in both houses of Parliament that they don't have.
Okay, so why don't they present evidence of 'vote chori' and 'EVM hacking' to the Supreme Court?
The Supreme Court has powers to invalidate election results in certain cases.
Because there is no such evidence.
All the 'evidence' and 'bombastic claims' are only for TV cameras and social media, to get people agitated.
Which is why they are mobilizing crowds as a gun to the head, and saying - resign or there will be anarchy and violence in the national capital.
There is a simple word to understand this - blackmail.
It should not be tolerated.
The country should respond to it in the harshest manner possible.
Do whatever it takes.
People who can't win elections through legitimate means don't get to enter through the backdoor with the use of violence.
Sawan Barwal didn't have a flag to hold after winning ๐ฅ in the men's marathon- first medal for ๐ฎ๐ณ in nearly half a century- at the Asia's Games in Nagoya. No official showed up on race morning since no one believed he had a chance to make history. https://t.co/SQRp5WHb56
Rome handed out free grain to 40,000 citizens in 73 BC. By 46 BC, Julius Caesar found 320,000 people lining up for their monthly ration. That eight-fold expansion happened in under three decades, and it shows you how welfare states actually grow.
No Roman senator stood up and announced a plan to addict a third of the city to government bread. It happened incrementally, through political competition. Each magistrate who wanted votes expanded eligibility. Each expansion normalized the next one. The citizen who once considered the dole shameful eventually expected it, then demanded it, then organized politically to protect it.
This is the core mechanism free market thinkers have identified across every era: once you create a transfer program, you create a constituency for that program. Recipients vote. Administrators build careers. Grain merchants who supply the state develop a stake in keeping the contracts flowing. The political economy locks in.
Caesar, to his credit, actually cut the rolls back to 150,000 through verification audits. It was one of his more economically coherent moves, though the Senate still murdered him. His successors quietly let the numbers climb again.
What did the dole require? Massive grain imports from Sicily, Sardinia, and Egypt, organized through state logistics at state expense, funded by taxation and conquest. When the conquest revenue dried up, the obligation remained. Rome had written a check against future military success, and future military success eventually failed to arrive.
The lesson is not complicated. Distribute a benefit and you distribute dependency. Distribute dependency and you distribute political power to whoever controls the distribution. The grain dole didn't weaken Rome overnight, but it made every subsequent reform politically impossible.
Missed this ORF article by Antara earlier but I have to say she is the best China analysts from India and tracks internal Chinese debates really well. Just as the shift in mobile phone supply chains caused unease in Chinese strategic circles
https://t.co/oMgnGUmghu
I made a website that plays bangers from indian barbershops
before you became fancy and started visiting salons. you once went to a 'saloon'. โน20 haircuts. simple hairstyles with music that could fix your soul.
https://t.co/j3E8VfwiUU