@Soteriology101@Phil_Johnson_ Notable Calvinist: “@Soteriology101 misrepresents #Calvinism”
SOT101: I welcome a discussion with any notable Calvinist scholar who would like to cordially discuss our differences so they can represent themselves.
Notable Calvinist: No, he is an ‘inveterate gospel twister’🤷♂️
Well,@Ieightonflowers cannot imagine that @RichardCPierce or JW will complain about the length or content of this one...well said! https://t.co/mwd3lfvYSB
@Phil_Johnson_@Soteriology101 @thethinkingrev @leightonflowers@csf61 @blakelong94 Yes we can. His reply was as clear the first time as this time. You just don’t know how to handle JMs quote so you overreact and divert onto the fact he didn’t say yes or no first. Silly sophomoric crud if you ask me.
@Soteriology101@Phil_Johnson_ @thethinkingrev @leightonflowers@csf61 @blakelong94 Leighton you are a patient man. We all know your article with the MacArthur quote already provided a perfectly clear and reasonable reply. Phil is just giving you the run around and nothing you say is going to be good enough for a man with his mind made up.
@Phil_Johnson_ I read his first article and his answer seemed clear to me. What is it you didn’t understand? Fine to Disagree with him. But he did answer you very clearly and nicely...are u being intentionally obtuse, Phil? It seems like it from my end.