Exposing the Tetanus Hoax 💉
- Only 13 tetanus deaths in the US in the last decade
- You can get the shot after an injury... yet babies get 5 doses
- Your risk of dying from tetanus? 1 in 154 million.
Just another Big Pharma cash grab. Wake up.
The same LED lights we are all forced to use in our homes, they produce Blue light which is harmful not only to humans but to animals and insects.
You might wonder why everything we are forced to adopt is always harmful to us ?
This greeted a North Pennines keeper in private woodland - habitat the estate manages for the Red-listed Spotted Flycatcher.
Bags of rubbish. Discarded kit. No respect for the land or the people who look after it.
We're told keepers are too quick to move campers on. This is what they're left to clear up.
Can't take your litter home? Then you've no business in the countryside.
🎞️ Courtesy of Northern Pennines Moorland Group
Africans hold a machete to the throat of a young White boy in Melbourne & tell him he’s going to die.
The Africans then force the 2 White boys to fight or they will kill them both.
This is multiculturalism.
This is ‘New Modern’ Australia.
WE DON’T HAVE TO LIVE LIKE THIS.
PROTECT ours nations kids 🤍
If it is this bad NOW, imagine a few more years of third world immigration.
🇬🇧 Most British schoolchildren are taught about Magna Carta.
They are taught it was sealed in twelve fifteen at Runnymede.
They are taught it is the foundation of English liberty.
They are taught it is one of the most important documents in human history.
They are not taught what came next.
They are not taught about the eighty years between twelve fifteen and twelve ninety-five when ordinary Englishmen forced three successive kings to write down, for the first time in any kingdom in medieval Europe, what English law was, what English liberty was, and how an English king must govern.
They are not taught about the Charter of the Forest, which restored the right to graze, gather firewood, and live on common land, and which remained in force for seven hundred and fifty-four years.
They are not taught about the Provisions of Oxford in twelve fifty-eight, often called England's first written constitution, which placed the king under a council of fifteen and required Parliament to meet three times a year.
They are not taught about the Provisions of Westminster in twelve fifty-nine, which subjected the barons themselves to the same law they had forced upon the king.
They are not taught about Simon de Montfort, an earl born in France who died for England, who summoned the first Parliament in English history to include ordinary commoners alongside the great lords.
They are not taught about the Statute of Marlborough in twelve sixty-seven, which is the oldest piece of statute law in the United Kingdom still in force today. ⚖️
Seven hundred and fifty-nine years old.
If you've ever taken a debt to court in England, you've used it. 🏠 If you've ever rented a home, you've been protected by it. 👑 If a creditor can't lawfully drag your possessions into the street to settle what you owe, that's because of a law signed seven hundred and fifty-nine years ago.
They are not taught about the Model Parliament of twelve ninety-five, summoned by Edward the First, which became the shape of every English Parliament since.
Eighty years. Three successive kings. The first written constitution in any kingdom in medieval Europe.
It was not given to them. It was not handed down from God or king or Pope.
✍️ It was written. By Englishmen. For England.
🇬🇧 The British write their own history. They always have.
This one needed more than a thread. The full story is in our video, watch it below 👇
Help us remember who we are. Help us remember every British achievement. 👇🙏
👉 https://t.co/rih7iKwnvf 👈
Be part of us. ☝️🇬🇧
Be Proud Of Us. 🙏🇬🇧
I am entirely uninterested in making exemptions for un-British religious practices.
What would Restore Britain do?
Halal slaughter, banned. The kirpan, banned, Kosher slaughter, banned. The burqa, banned. All of it, banned.
This is Britain - we do things our way.
The Free Speech Union has long warned that the official definition of Islamophobia — now repackaged as “anti-Muslim hostility” — would be used to silence legitimate criticism of Islam.
Within weeks, Labour MPs had reported Shadow Justice Secretary Nick Timothy to the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, branded him an “Islamophobe”, and called on the Prime Minister to remove him from his post.
Last week, 27 Labour MPs reported Reform UK to the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), accusing the party of Islamophobia and urging the Commission to investigate.
Led by Afzal Khan, a leading campaigner for an official Islamophobia definition, the MPs cited Nigel Farage’s criticism of the mass Muslim prayer event in Trafalgar Square, alongside comments made by Lee Anderson and Sarah Pochin.
This definition is already being weaponised to silence those who criticise Islam. It amounts to an Islamic blasphemy law by the back door.
Hear from FSU Campaigns Officer @MaxHThompson 👇
Whilst everyone’s distracted….
The old system is going night night
Those focusing on their I AM presence and alignment will know it, feel it and start seeing it.
BLACKOUT NECESSARY
Last month, I took the Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police, @AndyBurnhamGM’s police, to the High Court of Justice and won.
Burnham’s police had been protecting a man who hid his identity behind a VPN, stalked and threatened me relentlessly, shared details of my sister’s home address online and referenced raping her 6 year old daughter. He also posted AI generated content of my involved in Gay sex acts and fabricated stories linking me with child sex offenders.
This man, with direct links to Oldham’s Pakistani politicians, was trying to have me killed. Why? He objected to my campaigning to expose the Pakistani Rape Gangs and politicians links with organised crime in Oldham.
When caught red handed, senior police officers intervened to protect him from prosecution. They are still protecting him to this day and I am being forced to pursue a private prosecution.
Ask Andy Burnham if you want. He won’t say a word. He knows that I’m not making any of this up. Am I Andy Burnham? A judge in the High Court ruled that your police force had acted unlawfully.
Why is this relevant to the would be Prime Minister? As Police & Crime Commissioner, he is in charge of @gmpolice.
27 non-EU migrants have been given jobs for every 1 British young person, on average since 2020.
Allegedly,
the crisis in youth worklessness is being fuelled by mass immigration according to the centre for social justice.
The number of non-EU workers under 25 rose by 355% since 2020.
For British under 25s, that number rise by 0.3%.
These are damming statistics @Keir_Starmer 
You do not back British people
🫡🇬🇧
South Wales Police is enforcing its own bespoke Islamic blasphemy law — and it won’t be the only force to do so.
When the FSU warned that the Government’s official definition would silence legitimate criticism of Islam, some accused us of being hysterical.
Our warning has been vindicated time and again.
South Wales Police is now effectively enforcing a blasphemy code, with officers instructed to record speech that goes beyond what they regard as “legitimate discussion” of Islam.
But what constitutes “legitimate discussion” of Islam in a country that abolished blasphemy laws in 2008? And why should officers at South Wales Police have the power to decide what may and may not be said about Islam and Muslims?
The Government’s official definition of Islamophobia — now repackaged as “anti-Muslim hatred/hostility” — was a gilded invitation for public bodies to go even further with their own definitions and guidance.
The result is legal uncertainty. Individuals cannot know whether their lawful speech or beliefs will be recorded by the police, nor how any resulting record may be retained, used or disclosed.
If an officer decides that someone has crossed the line of what they consider “legitimate” debate about Islam and Muslims, the police will, in all likelihood, record it as an anti-social behaviour incident.
That record could then appear on an enhanced DBS check and cost someone a job.
We will inevitably see women who describe the burka as a tool of oppression logged alongside those who criticise halal food or public prayer events.
Most concerning of all, the policy will deter people from speaking out on sensitive issues — from the grooming gangs scandal to Islamist extremism — including public officials and journalists, for fear of acquiring a black mark against their name.
The Free Speech Union has written to South Wales Police demanding that it withdraw this guidance. If it refuses, it has been warned that judicial review proceedings will follow.
Read FSU Campaigns Officer @MaxHThompson’s opinion piece for @GBNEWS 👇